- Accuracy: Locally sourced data captures the unique variances influencing costs in a specific location, such as local labor rates, material availability and pricing, equipment costs, and regulatory requirements. National averages, even with location factors, often fail to capture these fine details, leading to potential inaccuracies of 30-40% or more in cost estimates.
- Granularity and Detail: Granular data is broken down into detailed line items (e.g., specific costs for each task, material, and labor component), providing comprehensive cost visibility and control. National averages are typically generalized and broad, which limits detailed cost management and tracking.
- Current Market Conditions: Local databases are fully updated more frequently (e.g., an entire new database provided quarterly) to reflect current, dynamic market fluctuations, supply chain disruptions, or labor shortages. National average database can lag behind current conditions, leading to outdated estimates.
- Contractor Alignment: Estimates based on local data align better with how local subcontractors and suppliers prepare their bids (hard bids) reducing potential disputes, change orders, and negotiation friction.
- Risk Mitigation: Using data that reflects real-world local conditions helps project managers make more informed decisions, identify risks (like material price changes), and manage budgets more effectively, ultimately reducing the risk of cost overruns and project delays.
- Transparency and Verifiability: Locally researched data is typically objective and verifiable, allowing for a transparent breakdown of costs. In contrast, location factors can involve a degree of subjectivity and general averaging.
- Inherent Inaccuracy: Location factors are generally intended for early, high-level (Class 4 or 5) estimates and are not reliable for detailed, “appropriation-quality” estimates.
- Oversimplification: A single multiplier for an entire city or region cannot accurately reflect cost variations between different neighborhoods or specific site conditions.
- Market Lag: National indexes often do not respond quickly to rapid local market changes in supply and demand, leading to significant discrepancies between estimated and actual costs.
#1. – “Location factors are used during preliminary project evaluations. They are not intended to be used when preparing appropriation-quality estimates. They often are applied to conceptual estimates for identifying “go/no-go” projects at an early stage.” (Peitlock, B.A., ccc, Developing Location Factors Using a Factoring Method, International Cost Engineering Council, ICEC International Cost Management Journal (ICMJ), 1998.)
#2. Location factors are primarily used in class 4 and 5 estimates and are not intended to be used for higher quality estimates, such as class 3, 2, or 1. The RSMeans city cost index (CCI) and the Department of Defense area cost factor (ACF) index are two primary examples of location factor publications. (Martinez, A., Validation of methods for adjusting construction cost estimates by project location , University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository, 2010)
#3. “Despite its potential weaknesses, estimation by adjustment factors is a very common approach for all types of construction. A very common approach for performing quick-order-of-magnitude estimates is based on using Location Cost Adjustment Factors (LCAFs). The accuracy of cost estimates in the early phases varies within an expected range that spans from -100% to +200% ” “Using the results of this study, various commercial entities (e.g., RS Means) could enhance their online tools by uploading publicly available socio-economic variables and allowing users to perform geostatistical analysis. As a result, a cost engineer could input the location of a project and obtain the most accurate location adjustment factor through a mix of interpolation and geostatistical prediction techniques.” (Migliaccio, G., Empirical Assessment of Spatial Prediction Methods for Location Cost Adjustment Factors, J Constr Eng Manag. 2013)
#4. “Problems within the methodology, unfortunately, will continue to arise as standardized estimation tools (CCI) simply cannot account for the unique characteristics of individual states. Unfortunately, the accuracy of program-wide CCIs occasionally led to swings of ±20 percent after projects had gone through the bidding process. Additionally, no direct application of market or economic conditions existed in this conventional CCI process, which was theorized by FHWA to potentially be a significant influence on resulting project estimate accuracy. ” (University of Colorado Denver College of Engineering and Applied Science Department of Civil Engineering, Validation of Project-level Construction Cost Index Estimation Methodology, 2017)
About Four BT, LLC (4BT
We help to create environments where the best people come to do their best work. We all succeed together.
Join us as we pave the way toward a new future for public and private sector efficient project delivery.
4BT exclusively provides verifiable, objective, current, local market construction cost data organized using expanded CSI Masterformat and supporting technology.
-Estimate project costs comprehensively
-Ensure budgets reflect the actual current local market labor, material, and equipment costs for successful project delivery.
-Create detailed and realistic project timelines
-Identify key milestones, task dependencies, and critical paths.
-Minimize risks associated with delays and budget overruns
-Provide a clear project roadmap and cost control mechanisms.
-Enhance resource allocation and utilization
-Align resources and scheduling with budget constraints.
