Skip to content
Four BT, LLC
  • Facilities Cost Management System
  • About Us
    • Contact Our Agile / Lean Team
  • Products
    • Construction Estimating Software
    • JOC Software
    • Unit Price Book – Actionable Construction Cost Data
      • Available JOC Unit Price Books – UPBs
      • Why use a JOC UPB?
      • What is a JOC UPB?
    • Preventive Maintenance Cost Database
    • Local Construction Cost Data
    • OpenBUILD(TM) Construction Integrated Project Delivery Solution
    • Product Reviews
  • Services
    • JOC Consulting
    • Training/Certification
      • JOC Certification Program
    • JOC Contractors
  • Learning Library
    • Articles/White Papers
      • Construction Cost Estimating
      • Construction Project Management
      • JOC IPD White Papers – LEAN Construction
      • JOC Presentations
      • JOC Case Studies
      • JOC References
      • JOC Federal Procurement
      • RFIs, RFPs – Samples & Templates
      • JOC Videos
      • Tools
    • Lifecycle Facilities Management
      • Lifecycle Facilities Asset Management
    • Construction Cost Estimating Primer & Glossary
    • Construction Project Delivery Overview & Comparison
    • FM DATA
      • Construction Classification Systems
      • Commercial Construction Costs
      • Life Expectancies – Materials, Equipment – Systems
      • FM Standards
    • Job Order Contracting FAQs
    • LEAN Construction
    • JOC Best Management Practices
      • JOC Basics
        • JOC Definition
        • Job Order Contract Guidelines
          • Job Order Contracting Guides
          • JOC Key Performance Indicators – KPIs
        • JOC Best Practices
        • JOC Benefits
        • Key Performance Indicators for Job Order Contracting
        • Independent Audits
        • JOC Links
        • JOC Research
        • Regulatory – JOC
        • JOC and Construction Glossary – Dictionary
      • JOC WebCasts
    • Job Order Contract Cooperative Agreements
      • Allied States Cooperative – ESC19 – Job Order Contracting Services – Texas
        • Roofing Job Order Contract – State of Texas
      • Allied States Cooperative – JOC Construction Services – New Mexico
      • Allied States Cooperative Job Order Contracting Services – Southern California
    • Construction Cost Data – International
  • LEAN Construction Guide
  • Partners/Cooperatives
    • Best Value Construction Services via Cooperatives
    • JOC Contractors
  • Blog
Four BT, LLC
  • Facilities Cost Management System
  • About Us
    • Contact Our Agile / Lean Team
  • Products
    • Construction Estimating Software
    • JOC Software
    • Unit Price Book – Actionable Construction Cost Data
      • Available JOC Unit Price Books – UPBs
      • Why use a JOC UPB?
      • What is a JOC UPB?
    • Preventive Maintenance Cost Database
    • Local Construction Cost Data
    • OpenBUILD(TM) Construction Integrated Project Delivery Solution
    • Product Reviews
  • Services
    • JOC Consulting
    • Training/Certification
      • JOC Certification Program
    • JOC Contractors
  • Learning Library
    • Articles/White Papers
      • Construction Cost Estimating
      • Construction Project Management
      • JOC IPD White Papers – LEAN Construction
      • JOC Presentations
      • JOC Case Studies
      • JOC References
      • JOC Federal Procurement
      • RFIs, RFPs – Samples & Templates
      • JOC Videos
      • Tools
    • Lifecycle Facilities Management
      • Lifecycle Facilities Asset Management
    • Construction Cost Estimating Primer & Glossary
    • Construction Project Delivery Overview & Comparison
    • FM DATA
      • Construction Classification Systems
      • Commercial Construction Costs
      • Life Expectancies – Materials, Equipment – Systems
      • FM Standards
    • Job Order Contracting FAQs
    • LEAN Construction
    • JOC Best Management Practices
      • JOC Basics
        • JOC Definition
        • Job Order Contract Guidelines
          • Job Order Contracting Guides
          • JOC Key Performance Indicators – KPIs
        • JOC Best Practices
        • JOC Benefits
        • Key Performance Indicators for Job Order Contracting
        • Independent Audits
        • JOC Links
        • JOC Research
        • Regulatory – JOC
        • JOC and Construction Glossary – Dictionary
      • JOC WebCasts
    • Job Order Contract Cooperative Agreements
      • Allied States Cooperative – ESC19 – Job Order Contracting Services – Texas
        • Roofing Job Order Contract – State of Texas
      • Allied States Cooperative – JOC Construction Services – New Mexico
      • Allied States Cooperative Job Order Contracting Services – Southern California
    • Construction Cost Data – International
  • LEAN Construction Guide
  • Partners/Cooperatives
    • Best Value Construction Services via Cooperatives
    • JOC Contractors
  • Blog
August 8, 2017August 8, 2017LEAN Job Order Contracting Intro 3

LEAN Job Order Contracting Intro 3

LEAN Job Order Contracting Intro 3 – Hoe to provide focus upon best value, quality, timeliness, and reasonable cost, assuring overall satisfaction.

LEAN Job Order Contracting Intro 3

  • Scope of Work is fully, unambiguously defined, coordinated and validated.
  • Scope validation phase  is longer and more intense than traditional design bid build, or other “so-called” JOC programs
    because more is accomplished.
  • All tasks are fully defined by detailed locally researched unit price line items from the accepted unit price book.
  • Owner provides LEADERSHIP and the team collaborates to resolve any inconsistencies or conflicts.
  • Each team member is responsible for their area of competence, task, and documentation.
  • Technology and tools used are inter-operable and fully transparent to support checking for inconsistencies/conflicts.
  • Industry standard terms, and clear, concise definitions in plain English are REQUIRED, as well as standardized data formats (CSI MasterFormat).
  • Predefined workflows, processes, sign offs, and work packages are consistently used, and continuously improved.
  • Technical Specifications are those in place by the Owner and not customized.
  • Subcontractor and other vendor insights are integrated into design and used for coordination and conflict
    resolution.
  • Focus is upon Best Value – Quality and Timeliness at a reasonable cost.

LEAN Job Order Contracting Intro 3

Learn more about LEAN Job Order Contracting Intro 3 …

Job Order Contracting – JOC Articles JOC Articles

AEC Best Value Construction and Facilities Operational Exellence- Position Paper

Collaboration In Construction-WhitePaper

JobOrderContractingWhitePaper2016801

JOC Construction Services RFP Considerations for Real Property Owners

IntegratedOrderContractingSAME

LEAN Construction, Building Energy Efficiency, & the Cloud

General Facility Management

Asset Total Cost of Ownership-Efficient Life-cycle Management Model

Classification Criticality – Architecture, Engineering, Construction, & Life-cycle Facility Management – A Draft White Paper

BIM for Facility Management

The Evolution of Construction Cost Estimating Technology

Maintenance and Repair of Federal Facilities

Integrated Project Delivery – IPD

Integrated_Project_Delivery_for_Public and Private Owners – AIA, NASFA, COAA, APPA, AGC

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
August 7, 2017August 8, 2017LEAN JOB ORDER CONTRACTING PROCESS INTRO 2

LEAN JOB ORDER CONTRACTING PROCESS INTRO 2

LEAN JOB ORDER CONTRACTING PROCESS INTRO 2 – LEAN Construction is an integral part of JOC and other integrated project delivery methods.LEAN JOB ORDER CONTRACTING PROCESS INTRO 2

1. Involve all key stakeholders including Owner, contractor, subcontractors, and building users in the process.
2. Identify key technologies, such as cloud based cost estimating and project management and begin to capture key parameters.
3. Cost structure – Locally researched unit provide book, UPB
4. Develop performance goals, including metrics for determining team performance.
5. Preliminary schedule for JOC Program and each JOC Project / JOC Task Order.
6. ALL decisions are made on a “best for project” basis.
7. Scope is fixed, price is fixed and cost is established on an detailed line item basis – joint site meeting, joint scope of work review/refinement.
8. Owner signs off on what will be built allowing the team to evolve and optimize any issues.  Collaborative approach and
focus is upon to schedule and outcomes.

 

Learn more…

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
August 7, 2017LEAN Construction Job Order Contracting, Uncategorized

LEAN Construction Job Order Contracting

LEAN Construction Job Order Contracting (INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY) – RELATIONSHIP CONTRACTING


LEAN Construction Job Order Contracting follows the fundamental aspects of integrated project deliver versus simply being a method to bypass delays and/or checks and balances provided by traditional procurement and/or construction delivery methods.

LEAN Construction Job Order Contracting


LEAN Construction Job Order Contracting offers several enhancements …

  1. Competent Owner providing leadership on-site management.

  2. Formation of a LEAN Job Order Contracting (JOC) core group which includes stakeholders

    from the Owner, Contractor, and Subcontractor (as applicable) – procurement, technical, facilities management, building users…)

  3. Joint refinement of Scope of Work

  4. Defined workflow and associated document packages

  5. Contract documents are developed.

  6. Collocation of team members at key phases

  7. Full financial transparency

  8. Locally researched unit price book

  9. Supporting cloud-based technology

  10. Iterative continuous improvement philosophy

  11. Focus upon BEST VALUE OUTCOMES

    1. Take ownership of the project

    2. Continuously improve the services, disciplines, and project delivery

    3. Consider life-cycle cost

    4. Deliver the project using defined workflows and monitor with key performance indicators (KPIs)

    5. All parties contribute to drive innovation & find cost savings and schedule improvements to bring the

    project in at the best value

    6. Employ OpenJOC transparent processes

  12. Shared Risk/Reward


LEAN Construction JOB ORDER CONTACTING is a deeply collaborative process that uses best available processes, information, and technology. Essential Principles are set forth as necessary and REQUIRED assumptions in that contribute to the teaming process. Unless all parties are deeply committed to these principles, LEAN Construction JOB ORDER CONTACTING
will not succeed.


Workflow begins with building an Integrated  and Competent Team and conclude with an integrated closeout for warranty period, operations, and maintenance.


LEAN Construction JOB ORDER CONTACTING

  • requires fundamental changes in participants, timing and intensity.
  • involves dynamic, flexible and iterative processes
  • integrates people, systems, business structures and practices
  • harnesses the talents and insights of all participants collaborative to reduce waste and optimize efficiency

ESSENTIAL PRINCIPLES of LEAN Construction JOB ORDER CONTACTING

ALL participants MUST share and apply common values and goals.

1. Mutual respect: Participants understand the value of collaboration and are committed to working as a team in the best interests of the project. To
harness the collective capabilities of the integrated team, all key participants should be involved as early as possible with multiple competencies, disciplines, technologies, and interests represented.

2. Mutual Benefit: All members will benefit and use innovative business models to support, rather than discourage, collaboration and efficiency.

3. Early Goal Definition: Project goals are developed early and agreed upon by all participants. Insight of each participant is valued in a culture that promotes and drives innovation and outstanding performance.

4. Enhanced Communication: Focus on team performance is based on communication among all participants that is open, straightforward and honest. Responsibilities are clearly defined in a no-blame culture leading to identification and resolution of problems, not determination of liability.

5. Appropriate Technology: Rely upon cloud technologies,  specified at JOC Program initiation, to maximize functionality, generality and interoperability.

6. High Performance: Integrated projects will lead to optimized design solutions, higher performance buildings/physical structures, and sustainable design.

7. Leadership: Although each participant is committed to achieving project goals, leadership should be taken by the OWNER.   Each participant should lead in areas of their traditional competence with support from the entire team; however specific roles are necessarily determined on a task at hand basis, and the OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING LEADERSHIP.  Roles are clearly MUST BE CLEARLY DEFINED.    No party (especially JOC CONSULTANTS) should create artificial barriers that chill open communication and risk taking, and/or are solely to the benefit of the JOC Consultant. The core LEAN CONSTRUCTION JOB ORDER CONTRACTING group exists to streamline decision making and problem resolution process.


 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
August 4, 2017August 4, 2017LEAN Job Order Contracting

LEAN Job Order Contracting

LEAN Job Order Contracting requires adherence to and the continuous improvement of process, and a central focus upon transparency, competency, relationships, and shared best value outcomes.

LEAN Job Order Contracting

How does this differ from Job Order Contracts currently being administered?   In some cases, there is little difference.  However, in some segments, particularly State, County, and Local Government, JOC is being used primarily as a means to “bypass” procurement or simplY speed up project deliver times.   These uses are NOT in concert with LEAN Job Order Contracting.

To determine if you are following a LEAN Job Order Contracting process, see if your JOC Program allows you to check off all the following boxes.  If not, you may wish to consider looking into your program a bit further.

  • Strong owner competency and leadership
  • Clear, quantitative JOC Program goals
  • JOC metrics (key performance indicators) 
  • Project prioritization methodology
  • Regular reassessment and audits
  • Continuous Improvement
  • Win/win program structure for owner and all service providers
  • Full financial transparency
  • Locally researched cost data
  • Compliance 
  • Focus upon Best Value Outcomes

ASSESS & PRIORITIZE NEED – FINANCIAL DUE DILIGENCE & FULL TRANSPARENCY – CLEAR ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES – DEFINED WORKFLOW & ASSOCIATED REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION/SIGN-OFFS – REGULAR INSPECTIONS – ONGOING TRAINING – REQUIRED COLLABORATION

PROJECT SET-UP & APPROVAL – PROJECT EXECUTION – COMPLIANCE


 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
August 4, 2017August 4, 2017Estimating Facility Life-cycle Costs

Estimating Facility Life-cycle Costs

Estimating Facility Life-cycle Costs is a critical aspect of facilities management.

Key elements associated with Estimating Facility Life-cycle Costs include the following:

  • Experience
  • Detailed Project Data
  • Systems costs and systems life-cycles
  • Detailed unit price line item information
  • Current and desired physical condition levels
  • Annual expenditures for operations and maintenance
  • Used of standardized data architectures (CSI Uniformat, CSI Masterformat)
  • Use of common, easily understood industry terms and definitions
  • Building models for multi-year capital planning – including system-level models, linked to unit price data and energy use models, etc.)
    • Expected system/assembly life-times
    • Current percentage of life used
    • Failure mode/failure distribution – percentage and associated curve
    • Priority – system criticality

Managing Life-cycle Costs

With respect to efficiently executing the numerous repetitive renovation and repair costs during the life span of a facility, Job Order Contracting, JOC is a LEAN collaborative construction delivery method that has proven capable of delivering over 90% of project on-time, on-budget, and to the satisfaction of all parties.  Learn more about JOC?

Estimating Facility Life-cycle Costs

What to learn more about Estimating Facility Life-cycle Costs?

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
August 4, 2017February 16, 2018Actionable Construction Cost Data for Job Order Contracting

Actionable Construction Cost Data for Job Order Contracting

Actionable Construction Cost Data for Job Order ContractingKey characteristics of actionable construction cost data for Job Order Contracting…

  • Independent Source
  • Locally Researched
  • CSI Masterformat data architecture
  • Clear concise definitions in plain English
  • Full details – labor, material, equipment, crew
  • Ability to create Non-pre-priced (NPP) line items from unit price book (UPB) line items
  • Best value (not linked to total value of construction project or total value of JOC construction)

Actionable Construction Cost Data for Job Order Contracting

If your looking for Actionable Construction Cost Data for Job Order Contracting, contact us today!

Benefits of Actionable Construction Cost Data for Job Order Contracting

  1. Uniform language among staff and service providers
  2. Shared vision
  3. Informed decisions
  4. Managed risk
  5. Improved efficiency

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
August 2, 2017Uncategorized

IPD LEAN Construction JOB ORDER CONTRACTING

IPD LEAN Construction JOB ORDER CONTRACTING – all are interrelated and all can lead to measurably improved outcomes for all participants.

IPD LEAN Construction JOB ORDER CONTRACTING


IPD – Integrated Project Delivery – Collaborative process that harnesses the talents and insights of all participants to optimize project results, increase value to the owner, reduce waste, and maximize efficiency through all phases of design and construction.

LEAN CONSTRUCTION – A way to design production systems to minimize waste of materials, time, and effort in order to generate the maximum possible amount of value.

JOC – Job Order Contracting – IPD specifically for renovation, repair, and minor new construction projects.


IPD LEAN Construction JOB ORDER CONTRACTING – PRACTICES

Ground Rules for Effective Communications
 No Animosity – Free & Open Communications (Keep it Professional)
 Respectful – Level of Trust / Build-up Relationships
 No Interruptions – One at a time
 No Bad Ideas
 Don’t Force a Situation / Response (Take time to correct issues)
 Focus on Solutions / Goals – Not Blame
 Be Accurate / Truthful
 Remember – We’re One Team (Support each other / We have the same goals)
 Listening vs. Talking
 Listening before Speaking

Improving Communications
 Listen carefully & help others do the same
 Invite others to restate what they heard the other person say
 Reflect back your understanding of content, feelings & meaning
 Dialog is seeking understanding; not agreement
 Use non-verbal communications to set a positive tone
 No “end arounds”

CONFLICT RESOLUTION
Team Goals and Objectives: All project team members working cooperatively in an
atmosphere of mutual trust, respect and understanding, to anticipate and streamline resolution
to problems. Core to this focus is identifying problems early by getting information from all
involved, conducting team problem solving, giving clear and direct communications and
providing timely resolution of issues.

OWNER RESPONSIBILITIES

OWNER’S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (LA) AND KEY STAFF
1. Coordinates necessary contacts with internal and external staff and team members, consultants, and community resources to ensure design and development review of the construction project.
2. Attends regular meetings on planning, maintains a record and observation of processes, and assists the team in ordering, storage, and placement of new materials and equipment as required. Serves as the central liaison between the building users, contractors, and all team members.
3. Represents the Owner and building users in meetings and public forums with affected and interested municipalities, community groups, businesses, individuals, regulatory personnel, and
legislators. Assists in the development of printed materials and other types of
information for presentation to various stakeholders. Makes oral presentations
covering a wide variety of project-related topics. Identifies and provides consultation
to staff, contractors, or volunteers, instructing on departmental regulations,
standards, and operating policies. Participates in all assigned/required training as needed.
4. Represents Owner in meetings with affected and interested stakeholders concerning
construction and operation issues and responds to questions from others
that arise during the course of construction.
5. Creation and assured compliance with roles and responsibility matrix.

Core Practices – IPD LEAN Construction JOB ORDER CONTRACTING

  • Reward desired behaviors
  • Alignment of risk and reward with a party’s ability to control risk
  • Creating a culture of partnership among stakeholders
  • Creating an open information environment
  • Integrating operating, design and construction knowledge through broad based team meeting
  • Reducing redundant efforts, conflicts
  • Improving means and methods
  • Modeling enterprise operations at the start, and behavior after occupancy
  • Mutually promote the success and benefit of the project and abide by the consensus decisions made by the Core Team composed of one leader from entity/area of competence.
  • Use detailed JOC Operations Manual/JOC Execution Guide to promote high performance with mutual benefit in the quality and efficiency of the process and outcome

IPD LEAN Construction JOB ORDER CONTRACTING

Learn more…

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
August 2, 2017April 4, 2019Uncategorized

Job Order Contracting Course – Competency 101

Job Order Contracting Competency 101 – The basic element of LEAN construction for renovation, repair, and minor new construction of the built environment.

Complimentary 20 Minute Webcast – Job Order Contracting Competency 101

Job Order Contracting Competency 101

Job Order Contracting Competency 101 – Outline

  1. What is LEAN Construction
  2. Owner & Contractor Requirements
  3. Requisite Tools
  4. Sample JOC Workflow

Register Here for Job Order Contracting Competency 101- (Time/Date TBD)



Job Order Contracting Competency 101 – your first step toward measurable improvements in productivity, quality, and overall satisfactions among participants.


About Us.

Our JOC Team helps Owners, Contractors, Subcontractors, Architectural&Engineering/Contract Management Companies and Cooperatives develop, deploy, and execute LEAN best practice Job Order Contracts.
  • Education, Training, and Support for LEAN JOC  construction delivery methods.
  • Structured, Reliable, Best Value, Construction Cost Data & Unit Price Books.
  • Technology supporting low cost, consistent deployment and monitoring.

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
August 1, 2017April 13, 2020Uncategorized

Job Order Contracting FAQs

Job Order Contracting FAQs are provided to assist in understanding JOC processes and procedures as well as improve the final outcomes for all participants.

Job Order Contracting FAQs

How JOC Contracts do Owners bid?

Owners may bid a single contract or bid several contracts base upon geographic area and/or type of work required (roofing, paving, electrical, etc.)

Are JOCs awarded via lowers bidder or best value?

Owners may elect to award JOCs to the prescribed number of responsible and eligible bidders bidding the lowest coefficients per solicitation.

We, however, suggest that a best value approach be used.  This considers the bidders previous work history as well as the coefficient.
How is are JOC contracts priced, since it the amount of work is open-ended?

Actual projects are not identified at the time of bid.  Pricing for individual projects are based upon the 4BT OpenJOC Unit Price Book and the applied contractor JOC coefficient.    The coefficient (or multiple coefficients), serve as a modifier or adjustment factor, to the applicable unit price book(s) approved for the JOC.    For instance, a coefficient of 1.20 would represent a 20% markup.   The coefficient generally must include all project general conditions as described in the contract, including but not limited to supervision, overhead and profit.  It represents the total cost for an installed unit.  Projects, considered Job Orders under a a JOC contract are generally scoped and priced as part of the process described in the contract.   Once a Job Order is approved, the price becomes a lump sum price for the project.

How do I, as a contractor, develop a coefficient? What is a typical coefficient?

Contractors may develop the coefficients that they choose to bid by any means they desire based on their own experience.  Some contractors develop coefficients by analyzing the unit prices in the Unit Price Books and comparing them to historic and anticipated actual costs, plus overhead and profit.  They may not analyze all unit price line items (generally 30,000-40,000) but may focus on key commonly used tasks.  If a contractor maintains good job costing information, they can select corresponding line items out of the Unit Price Books and compare actual costs including general conditions, overhead and profit.  Historic project analysis, where you take a historic project where costs are known, and then generate a line item estimate based on the applicable Unit Price Book would provide a differential  The differential (including overhead and profit) could provide a reasonable  basis for the coefficient is an appropriate cross section of tasks is selected.   Projects selected should be similar in size, general condition requirements, and possible distribution of work items.

Is the 4BT OpenJOC Unit Price Book similar to a national average price book and the associate used of location factors? 

No.  The 4BT OpenJOC Unit Price Book has been locally researched for the specified JOC area(s).  We do not recommend the use of commercial and/or national average price books.

What are prevailing wage requirements?

Prevailing wage rate requirements of the contract will be imposed by the Job Order Contract.   Davis-Bacon Wage Rates are required for federal government projects and/or those using federal funds.  They also generally provide a reasonble approximation of local prevailing wage rates.   It is critical that labor is locally researched and that national average data not be used.

How may the Job Order Contracts support Minority and Women-owned businesses?

Studies of JOC in the federal government have shown that JOC increases opportunity for small and disadvantaged businesses.  The type of work performed under a JOC should provide   provide opportunities for emerging businesses, whether they serve as prime contractors or a trade subcontractors.    Note that not all JOCs allow for subcontractors.

What is overview of your company and what differentiates your products and services from your competitors ? We founded 4BT in 2016 upon seeing a clear need to Rethink, Reshape, and Rebuild JOC. Basically, to assure that 1. LEAN planning, procurement, and project delivery processes were deployed in a manner that is mutually beneficial to all participants and stakeholders….2. Full transparency and compliance was provided… 3. That solutions did not burden users with excessive fees and costs.and 4. Cost data was truly reflective of local market conditions.

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
August 1, 2017LEAN Procurement via Collaborative Job Order Contracting

LEAN Procurement via Collaborative Job Order Contracting

LEAN Procurement via Collaborative Job Order Contracting provides significantly improve outcomes for all participants and stakeholders.

There are several core elements associated with LEAN Procurement via Collaborative Job Order Contracting for real property owners, construction contractors, and building users.   All begin with the desired outcomes of the project life-cycle in the forefront.
  • Identifying and prioritizing key requirements (personnel, assets, methods, timelines)
  • Defining and developing processes that support positive outcomes
  • Identifying and adhering to a common data environment including a locally researched, independent, and objective unit price book
  • Implementing workflows and processes consistently and leveraging purpose-built  JOC cloud technology

LEAN Procurement via Collaborative Job Order Contracting  required teaming throughout the life-cycle of the project.   Procurement, engineering, and building uses are part of the project from concept through warranty.

 

The Benefits of LEAN Procurement via Collaborative Job Order Contracting

  • Project sequencing optimization – Process is well defined to assure that information is created and shared at the right time
  • Information-asset alignment & transparency – Classification of project information is standardized (MasterFormat) and aligned with user requirements
  • Waste reduction – Shared information environment and defined LEAN construction processes mitigate miscommunication, change orders, and legal disputes
  • Projects timelines are shortened.
  • Quality & Satisfaction are enhanced
  • Reduced complexity via standardized processes, data formats, and information sharing among varied areas of expertise – Procurement is complex and difficult without the support of varied competencies. Challenging traditional, ingrained, and inefficient processes in favor of collaborative LEAN methods improves productivity through the use of openly-shared common information.

]

Owners must be competent and provide LEADERSHIP  (Click to read 2017 NIBS Article)

The success LEAN Procurement via Collaborative Job Order Contracting and attainment of available benefits requires that real property owners/facilities management be competent and provide leadership.  The capability of the Owner team and the maturity of the associated facilities management systems must be at a prerequisite level.

Owners must view service providers as part of their team and operate within an atmosphere of mutual respect and trust.

Owners can work with JOC consultants to structure JOC Programs, however, JOC consultants should NOT be managing the JOC Program.   JOC programs are collaborative service supply models and require equal participation of all stakeholders in terms of roles, responsibilities, information creation/sharing, monitoring, etc.

The JOC collaborative construction service supply model  relies upon an integrated team with a focus upon attaining positive outcomes, and a shared approach to problem solving and challenges.

Learn more…

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
August 1, 2017August 1, 2017RFP JOC Construction Contractors

RFP JOC Construction Contractors

RFP JOC Construction Contractors

RFP JOC Construction Contractors – Solicitation is for JOC construction services for the maintenance, repair, alteration, renovation, remediation, or minor construction of a facility when (1) the work is of a recurring nature but the delivery times are indefinite and (2) indefinite quantities and orders are awarded substantially on the basis of pre-described and pre-priced tasks.

ALL VENDORS (JOC Construction Contractors) must register at www.alliedstatescooperative.com  and check off “JOC services” in the event of any addendums to the Solicitation.  Bidding information and documents are also available.

Tools:

4BT OpenJOC™ UPB

4BT OpenJOC™ system

üContracts are awarded through open competition in compliance with applicable procurement rules and regulations.

üASC sends a Proposal Request to the Vendor, vendor reads about it in the newspaper, or is contacted by another professional bid finding company on behalf of the vendor. In those instances, the vendor is encouraged to log-in at www.alliedstatescooperative.com under Vendor Registration so that in the event there is an addendum or change, they will be notified via email.

üAll proposals are evaluated, however all vendors submitting proposals will be notified whether or not they are given an award.

üThe Vendor and ASC or the ASC member then agrees on a Delivery Order.

üThe Vendor and ASC or the ASC member agrees on a Purchase Order referencing the ASC contract number. No other contract forms may be used, over or in lieu of the purchase order as it will negate the legally procured and awarded contract. Purchase Orders are reported and sent by individual ASC members to the Vendor and to ASC, where they are logged and filed.

üThe Vendor delivers product(s)/service(s) directly to ASC or the ASC member and then invoices ASC or the ASC member depending on who is directly requesting the goods and/or services.

üThe Vendor receives payment directly from ASC or ASC member.

üThe Vendor reports the administrative fee to ASC and pays the fee to ASC.

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
July 31, 2017July 31, 2017Contractor Proposal Reviews for Job Order Contracts

Contractor Proposal Reviews for Job Order Contracts

Contractor Proposal Reviews for Job Order Contracts are an important element to overall JOC Program success.

These reviews should be done by the Owner and by an independent and objective third party.

An Informal Compliance Review (ICR) is the most widely used form of review.   An ICR is a high level estimate audit that include a line item review that typically meets an agencies contract documents requirement.

JOC industry standards should be used for ICRs or any type of auditing of contractor proposals.  Audits serve to assure transparency and overall program compliance.

An ICR includes a review of the owner’s and contractors SOW  narrative and documents. to gain an understanding of the proposed construction means and methods and its relation to estimate development.  An inconsistent SOW narrative is the primary cause of project issues, including change orders.

An ICR also includes review of the contractor’s proposal for reviewed for the contractor’s coefficient as it is applied to each line item per the estimate document.

Contractor Proposal Reviews for Job Order Contracts

Proper line item usage and associated use of comments are also important.
Proper usage of notes and formula’s on the part of the contractor can dramatically improve communicate and reduce overall project errors.
Conversely, the lack of notes and formulas generally increase the negotiation and value of engineering time, the purchase order issuance time frame, and the time between estimate submittal and construction project start.

Use of trade labor is considered a “Time & Material” estimate and not appropriate as a JOC unit price line item. If a line item cannot be found for a SOW task, a Non-Prepriced (NPP) line item should be considered and used. A NPP typically requires 3 subcontractor and/or material quotes and should given to submission to the owner for evaluation and UPB inclusion.

Division 1 is generally not allowed for JOC.

Also, qualitative or “open ended” proposals and/or line items should be rejected… i.e. the use of terms“as needed”, “as required”, “as directed”, “it is the intent”, should not be allowed.

Learn more about JOC Program Best Management Practices…

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
July 27, 2017Uncategorized

Job Order Contract Roles and Responsibilities

Appropriate Job Order Contract Roles and Responsibilities promote best management practices and optimal outcomes for all stakeholders.

JOC Procurement/Purchasing/Contracting Authority

The Real Property Owner and an assigned Contracting, Procurement, Purchasing Authority should be the SIGNING AUTHORITY for any JOC task order/project, with appropriate authority/co-signature of the Owner’s assign Technical Authority (from Facilities Management, DPW, Engineering, etc.)

The assigned Owner authority (JOC Program Manager)  has the responsibility for ensuring the performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting and ensuring compliance with the terms of the contract.

Contractor

The contractor has the responsibility to provide a detailed line item proposal to the Owner, using the accepted JOC Unit Price Book, per the Owner’s request (based upon an Owner Statement of Work and joint site visit), within a defined period, and properly executed the work if accepted by the Owner.

The Contractor provides a full-time JOC Project Manager to serve as the focal point for all work and be responsible for the coordination of on-site activities. The JOC Project Manager shall represent the Contractor and serve as the Contractor’s prime point of contact and the Owner’s sole point of contact for all contract matters

Owner Technical/Engineering/Facilities Management DPW Team/Authority

This individual generally doesn’t have procurement authority (though may request task order proposals) and signature may be required on required JOC procurement documents.  He/she provides an Owner’s Statement of Work with all associated  specifications and/or drawings, and conducts walk through site visits/inspections.

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
July 27, 2017July 27, 2017Uncategorized

The OpenJOC Process Job Order Contract Best Management Practices

The OpenJOC Process Job Order Contract Best Management Practices for Owners and Contractors that DEMAND Best Value, Quality, and Maximum Productivity.

OpenJOC Process Job Order Contract Best Management Practices

Independent, Best Value Solutions for ANY JOC Program

•LOCALLY RESEARCHED Unit Price Book –4BT OpenJOC™ UPB
•Supporting CLOUD JOC Software –4BT OpenJOC™ system
•JOC Services
Training (Introductory & Advanced)
Estimate Reviews
JOC Program Development
JOC Program Marketing
•A Veteran-Owned Small Business
•Experienced Team
Decades of proven results, working with…JOC, Cost Engineering, Cost Estimating, & Project Management: The RS Means Company LLC, 4Clicks Solutions, US Cost, VFA Inc., The JOC Group, CJE –Center for JOC Excellence, Owners, Contractors

The OpenJOC Process Job Order Contract Best Management Practices

  • Share quick access with your team
  • Create detailed estimates – Point and click, and build estimates in minutes versus hours, hours versus days, days versus months
  • Current pricing – Standardized & LOCALLY RESEARCHED
  • Nationwide Training – Virtual, On-site – Introductory through Advanced
  • Leading CLOUD Technology

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
July 26, 201716 Things Every Contractor Should Know When Bidding a Job Order Contract

16 Things Every Contractor Should Know When Bidding a Job Order Contract

16 Things Every Contractor Should Know When Bidding a Job Order Contract is just an introduction to anyone interested in JOC.  Learn more…

6 Things Every Contractor Should Know When Bidding a Job Order Contract

 

1. Typically, what kind of information is given to the general contractor to put together a price and approximately how often does each occur?  For example, are drawings given to the general contractor 50% of the time?  Is the other 50% of the time just walking the job and talking about scope?

Information varies by Owner.  At a minimum, the Owner should provide a statement of work with sufficient detail to enable the contractor to create a detailed line item construction cost estimate.  Information should include a description of current conditions including access, materials, dimensions, and a drawing/PDF, as well as a description and drawing/PDF of requirements.

2. Approximately what percentage of the time are specifications provided?

Specifications should be provided for all work order requests.  For Owners following “best management practices”  specialized JOC specifications are NOT used.  The Owner simply references their existing Technical Specifications. The reason for this is obvious.  The Owner should expect the same quality and type of work across their portfolio. Be Specifications should be per the Job Order Contract and associated with the UPB.  AIA MasteSpec or BSD Speclink specifications or the owner equivalent are generally used for commercial construction.  All local, state, and national codes apply to work done under an executed contract.

Individual owner specifications may also be provided.  Specifications should be present to indicate minimal standards as the usage, materials, and content needs of the owner.

3. Who is responsible for making the quantity takeoff(QTO)?  Is it the general contractor?  Is it an electrical (other trade) contractor that performs the work?

The awarded JOC contractor is responsible for QTO.   If subcontractors are allowed and used per the JOC, it is still the ultimate responsibility of the awarded JOC contractor.

4. Who is responsible for checking the unit price line items in a contractor  proposal?  

The awarded JOC contractor is responsible for all unit line items as well as any nonprepriced line items.  The Owner SHOULD, per fiscal responsibility, check each and every line item.   If a JOC Cooperative is used and/or a JOC Consultant, they may conduct audits of specific project estimates at their discretion and per the JOC Program requirements.

16 Things Every Contractor Should Know When Bidding a Job Order Contract is just an introduction to anyone interested in JOC.  Learn more…

5. Who is responsible for checking the quantities we enter into the JOC to create a proposal?

The awarded JOC contractor is responsible for all quantities entered in the JOC software.  (Also see Question #4 and Response)

6. Typically, how many general contractors are invited to bid on a JOC project?

The number of awarded JOC contractors invited to bind on any individual project varies.  It typically ranges from one (1) to three (3) awarded JOC contractors.  The Owner and/or Cooperative generally has the right to approve and/or award contracts.  The decision to award one, several, or no contracts rests solely with the Owner and/or JOC Cooperative.  Under NO CIRCUMSTANCES should a JOC Consultant be involved in make an award decision if the JOC Consultant is being compensated via a % of JOC construction volume.   

7. The information we have seen from previous JOC proposals indicate Coefficient factors run from .80 to 1.20 for Standard Working hours and .68 to 1.30 for Non-Standard Working hours.  Is this the range that you typically see?

Yes.   For properly designed and managed JOC programs, coefficients average from 0.80 t0 1.20.    If coeffficients are under 0.80 it can be difficult for awarded JOC contractors to make a reasonable profit and can place undue pressure on the contractor.   Coefficients over 1.20 are typically the result of site access/security issues or other unusual circumstances.

8. Who determines which general contractor will be asked to price a specific project for a member in a JOC Cooperative situation?  Is it the member?  Is it somebody the JOC Cooperative?

It is generally the member party (school district, government body, etc.) that determines which contractor will be asked to price a specific project.  In fact, if could be considered a conflict of interest for a JOC Cooperative to make a determination in this regard on a specific project.    Purchase orders are issued by participating governmental agencies (schools, school districts, government entities, etc.)  indicating “Per JOC Cooperative Contract”, on the appropriate document.

The decision as to the number of contractors and their regions awarded contracts, however, is solely made by the JOC Cooperative and/or Owner.   Note:  Most JOC Cooperatives are managed by private entities.  The only JOC Cooperative run and managed by a Government Entity on a nationwide basis is ESC19/Allied States Cooperative.

9. When are proposals due form a Contractor to an Owner?

All timing requirements are specified in the JOC award documents, when should include a JOC Operations/Execution Manual.

10. Do General Contractor’s typically find a team of subcontractors skilled in using a UPB?

The awarded JOC contractor must have a full understanding of costs for all project requirements.  A fundamental aspect of JOC is that the contractor have requisite knowledge to price all tasks required by a JOC owner.   The Unit Price Book (UPB), and associated coefficient(s) and the associated quantities are the source of proposal / task order construction cost estimates.   If the awarded JOC contractor is skilled/knowledgeable relative to the UPB and the UPB is appropriate for the JOC Program, use of the UPB should be sufficient.   Of course,  subcontractors must be allowed per the JOC,  and the subcontractor must be equally skilled/knowledgeable relative the associated UPB.

11. How do general contractors handle the situation where the pricing from one trade, like drywall, runs about 92% of the prices and the prices from another trade, like electrical, run 105% of the  prices?  It seems very unlikely that any two trades will have the same coefficient factor which they charge us.  So our overall coefficient factor will depend upon the proportion of each trades work in the project.  For example, if Project A is 90% drywall and 10% electrical, the general contractor’s overall cost will be different than Project B which has 10% drywall and 90% electrical.

PROJECT A                        JOC $                                   Cost to GC

Drywall                $90,000      x       92%   =  $82,800

Electrical             $10,000      x       105% =  $10,500

TOTAL                                                               $93,300

PROJECT B

Drywall                $10,000      x       92%   =  $  9,200

Electrical             $90,000      x       105%  = $94,500

TOTAL                                                               $103,700

 

Individual JOC task orders/project must be bid by the eligible JOC contractors(s) using the UPB and allowable coefficient(s) only, regardless of the associated distribution of “trades” associated with the particular task order/project.   JOC is based upon the premise that the UPB is generally applicable to all trades.  Furthermore, the JOC contractor may make a varying profit for various individual projects, however, each a reasonable profit overall.

12. We have encountered several contradictions between a JOC RFQ, the Questions and Answers, and Addenda.   Here are a few.  

– General Conditions – is our coefficient factor supposed to include costs such as project superintendent, jobsite trailer, port-a-cans, etc. or do we add line items from the UPB for these costs?

The coefficient should contain all requisite project administrative and/or set-up costs, including overhead and profit.  General conditions are generally not allowed.  Please note that in the case of a JOC Cooperative administrative fee is generally also required.

– Engineering fees appear to be included in our coefficient factor but the RFQ clearly states that this RFQ is not for engineering or architectural scope

Per most, if not all, legislation/regulations, engineering fees are not allowed in a Job Order Contract.  JOC is designed for routine renovation, repair, and maintenance that doesn’t include any significant engineering component.

– P&P Bond costs appear to be included in our coefficient factor  but Q&A stated that these are a pass through cost.

Performance and payment bonds are governed by any and all applicable state and local laws or policies.   P&P bonds are may be linked to the contract between the member agency and the prime contractor, if a cooperative situation, and for example  stipulated to be 100% of specified contract price.  The actual cost of the bond is a pass through, however, any tax consequences should be consider with respect to impact upon profit.

13. Should we qualify our JOC proposal, or will that likely disqualify us?

JOC experience is considered very highly by Owners and JOC Cooperatives if not virtually a mandatory requiremenOur recommendation is to answer any questions on experience in terms of the fundamental characteristics of JOC – early and ongoing information sharing with clients and subcontractors, collaboration, financial transparency, on-demand service, responsiveness to emergency service requests, customer/problems resolution process,  financial status/condition, safety record, reputation/testimonials/references, past experience with similar owners, employee experience, market outreach capabilities (marketing, education/training) etc.  Furthermore, we have found that most effective way to enter the JOC market is to participant on JOC programs as subcontractor.

14. Regarding “Economies of Scale”, how is this handled in a JOC?

The only economies of scale contained in a UPB are quantity based line items.   Historically, these are not generally found within and commercial “national average” cost databases, however, have are included within JOC UPBs.  Also, the ability to perform multiple jobs for the same owner, in the same location provides significant economies.

15. It is normal to include a “Buy American Act” into our coefficient factor.  

Vendors may be exclusively responsible for compliance of the Buy American requirement for the certain states and for virtually all Federal Agencies. all other applicable states.  Separate coefficients for these “applicable locations” are generally not specifically allowed, nor are nonprepriced line items.

 

16. Do general contractors typically get subcontractors approved during the JOC pricing effort we are currently bidding?

Yes.  In fact it is considered “best practice”, if not mandatory to have subcontractors approved prior to award, and or shortly after award, and certainly prior to any use of subcontractor.


16 Things Every Contractor Should Know When Bidding a Job Order Contract is just an introduction to anyone interested in JOC.  Learn more…

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
July 25, 2017Uncategorized

RFP for JOC Construction Services – ADDENDUM

REGION 19 EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER
PURCHASING DEPARTMENT
ALLIED STATES COOPERATIVE
6611 BOEING DRIVE
EL PASO, TX 79925
NOTICE OF ADDENDUM
Addendum No.1 on Request for Proposal # 17-7261 titled Job Order Contracting and Facilities Construction Services – State of Texas – ESC Region 19-Allied States Cooperative which was previously set to close August 3, 2017 at 2:00 PM MST requires the following changes and/or additional information:
1. The solicitation close date has been changed to August 30, 2017 at 2:00 PM MST.
2. The following language has been incorporated into the RFP.
a. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION WITH GOVERNMENT CODES 2252 & 2270: I, the vendor, am in compliance with all applicable provisions of Government Codes 2252 & 2270. This code requires vendors agree to NOT boycott Israel or do business with companies that boycott Israel. In addition vendor cannot do business with Iran, Sudan or a known terrorist organization. By submitting a response to this solicitation, vendor certifies compliance with this code.
b. Should this contract be utilized by a State of Texas entity, vendor agrees that any project relating to the construction, remodeling, or altering of a building, a structure, or infrastructure, including a road or highway, or who supply a material for such projects, to source iron or steel products used in such projects from the US. Proof must be provided to the state entity should it be requested. In addition, if the product listed above would increase the cost by more than twenty (20) percent, documentation must be provided to approve non-compliant product to be utilized.
3. Page 21, Paragraph 2 adds the following after sentence 3: “and/or as requested by either the Member or by Vendor/Member/4BT partnering. A corresponding Regular Working Hours and Non-Regular Working Hours coefficient shall be provided by the Vendor.”
4. Coefficients below 1.00 may be considered non-responsive.
5. A webinar training for the 4BT OpenJOC™ software will be held on August 8th at 10:00am MST. Registration is for vendors that have completed the Non-Disclosure Agreement only. Contact Becky Hernandez at rshernandez@esc19.net for registration information. Webinar is not mandatory but is highly recommended.
6. See attached list of current submitted questions and answers.
7. Vendors may not lobby any person regarding this contract including attempting to influence contract award or vendor selection. Violators will not be offered a contract.


BIDDING INSTRUCTIONS for JOC Construction Contractors

ALL VENDORS (JOC Construction Contractors) must register at www.alliedstatescooperative.com  and check off “JOC services” in the event of any addendums to the Solicitation.  Bidding information and documents are also available.


Structuring a Job Order Contract

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
July 17, 2017August 18, 2019Job Order Contracting - JOC - Integrated Project Delivery

Job Order Contracting JOC Integrated Project Delivery

Real Property Owners, Facilities Management, and Construction Contractors can all benefit from enhanced project productivity, quality, and satisfaction.    All are attainable with Job Order Contracting JOC Integrated Project Delivery.

While technical improvements in construction processes, new building materials and the use of technology to streamline project management are all important, LEAN collaborative construction delivery methods are the only solution PROVEN to deliver over 90% of project on-time, on-budget, and to the satisfaction of all stakeholders.

Job Order Contracting (for renovation, repair, and minor new construction) and Integrated Project Delivery (for major new construction, are the two most widely known and used forms of collaborative construction delivery.   Both require “a collaborative alliance of people, systems, business structures and practices into a process that harnesses the talents and insights of all participants to optimize project results, increase value to the owner, reduce waste, and maximize efficiency through all phases of design, fabrication, and construction.”

Job Order Contracting JOC Integrated Project Delivery align the interests, objectives and practices of all parties involved in a construction project. Participants work as one team, creating increased productivity and higher quality, saving time, minimizing disputes and litigation, and creating a more rewarding process for the entire team.

Job Order Contracting - JOC - Integrated Project Delivery

Job Order Contracting JOC Integrated Project Delivery REQUIRE  a high level of collaboration among all project stakeholders, from the early stages of planning/design through to project completion/handover, with the objective of achieving the highest level of efficiency through:

  • Combining the knowledge and expertise of all participants to maximise the value each participant provides to the project and to optimize the utilization of technical capabilities and support
  • Open communication to engender a “no-blame” attitude; where problems are identified, there is no move to establish liability, but instead a focus on having them resolved quickly
  • Timely sharing of up-to-date information to ensure all participants work on the same version of project documentation and reports
  • Financial transparency and trust to encourage participants to concentrate on project outcomes rather than on their own individual objectives
  • A common data environment (CDE), including a unit price book
  • Sharing risks and rewards where compensation is directly related to the value that each participant adds to the project, and incentives are tied to achieving overall project goals.
  • Collaborative cloud-based technology that support LEAN practices, enabling consistent, low-cost deployment
  • Owner competency and leadership

 

 

 

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
July 13, 2017July 13, 2017Strategic Considerations for a JOC Program

Strategic Considerations for a JOC Program

Strategic Considerations for a JOC Program include a thorough Evaluation of Objectives, Goals, and Appropriateness.

 

Development and review of Strategic Considerations for a JOC Program improve the value and overall success for all participants and stakeholders.

An owner’s review of the historical type and volume of construction work is the first step.  This will help to establish the level of need.

Strategic Considerations for a JOC Program

It’s generally considered that numerous and repetitive renovation, repair, maintenance, sustainability, and minor new construction (where allowed) with a minimum total annual volume of $2M is an initial threshold for setting up an in-house, owner-managed job order contract.

If an owner doesn’t meet this criteria, participation in a JOC Cooperative may be a viable altnerative to an owner established JOC Program.
Facility management/engineering should conduct a review of work that could be done under the support of the JOC program and develop an estimated annual volume.

Strategic Considerations for a JOC Program improve the value and overall success for all participants and stakeholders…

Work below a specified and appropriate threshold (for example $10,000) should not be included in the analysis as this level may not be cost effective and/or may be best accomplish by in-house staff or alternative methods.

Consider what work is being accomplished, how, by whom, and where. Also consider the urgency of tasks and other elements that would benefit from fast, high quality turn around.    JOC is particularly well suited for reducing an existing backlog of projects/tasks.

Consideration of future requirements is also important.
It’s beneficial to review historical and planned budgets  to assure long term, consistent execution of the JOC program, including any existing related contracts, etc., in order to avoid any potential conflicts or work disruption.
A review of owner staff personnel and management philosophy is critical in order to assure in-house capability to support a JOC Progam from a the technical (facility management/engineering), purchasing, and other  administrative areas.  In-house staff MUST be capable of reviewing line item detailed construction cost estimates provided by the awarded JOC contractors.  In certain JOC programs, in-house staff MUST also be capable of creating in-house and/or independent owner estimates for use in comparison to contractor estimates.

Determining the source for the JOC UPB is also extremely important.  The JOC UPB must be from an independent, objective, and quality source.  It should be locally researched and not a national average cost book (even the use of localization factors and a national average price book and introduce gross errors and JOC performance issues).  The UPB should include detailed line items with easy to understand descriptions in plain English using industry standard terms, with a minimum use of confusing acronyms.   The UPB should provide sufficient content to assure that a minimum of 90% of the work to be accomplished for a particular project is derived from the UPB in terms of value and a  maximum of 10% from non-prepriced (non-UPB) line items.  Factors such as ease of use, should also be considered.  For a example, most JOC Programs only require 30,000 to 60,000 line items.  An excessive number of line items…i.e. hundreds of thousands, can create confusion, cause errors, and negatively impact a JOC Program.

Technology is also important, and cloud computing can greatly aid in assuring collaboration and compliance.

Initial and ongoing training for all JOC Program participants is a requirement, as are regular JOC Audits.

Customized technical specifications are NOT REQUIRED for a JOC Program.   An owner’s existing technical specifications should be referenced and used for the JOC Program.  If technical specifications are not available, they may be purchased and adapted as needed.

Strategic Considerations for a JOC Program
A market of local contractors to assure a pool of qualified and interested companies is another important task. This should include consideration of any specific technical or service requirements associated with the JOC program.
Depending upon the types and locations of work, as well as service levels, there may be a need to have multiple JOC UPB’s and/or multiple coefficients. For example, work in several locations and/or associated varied building types, or security/access issues,  may require the use of various location factors or even separate JOC unit price books. (Separate coefficients may be require for work during normal hours, or after hours, and or for specific types of buildings and/or for secure areas.)
The structure, content, and values associated with indirect costs and profit for non-prepriced (NPP) work should be clearly noted.
A final report summarizing the results and conclusions of the strategy component of the JOC Program is helpful the final decision and approval processes.

 

Learn more…

Four BT, LLC
4BuildingTogether
www.4BT.us

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
July 12, 2017July 12, 2017Structuring a Job Order Contract

Structuring a Job Order Contract

Here are a few considerations for structuring a job order contract and implementation.
A JOC contract includes one or more coefficients, a JOC unit price book, UPB, (which is typically updated annually for pricing and potentially new line items, and for greatest value is locally researched), and has a duration ranging from one year to five years. The JOC contract is generally issued with a 12-month term followed by up to four option years.

Structuring a Job Order Contract
Monitoring of contractor, team, and overall JOC contract performance is necessary. This includes task order pricing, adherence to the UPB, and meeting any small, small disadvantaged, and women-owned business contracting or subcontracting requirements.
Any work awarded to the contractor beyond the minimum per the contact is solely determined by the owner.
Option years, if included, are generally considered separate contracts, and all minimum/maximum values noted and awarded.

Structuring a Job Order Contract for optimal performance and best value required implementation of best management practices, BMPs, and appropriate tools.

When structuring a job order contract, the maximum value should be specific for the total value of the contract, including all option years. The maximum value may not be exceeded. For example, if a JOC states that the maximum is $20M over 5 years with an estimate of $5M per year, $8M could be awarded the first year.
Current Davis-Bacon Wage Determination must be used for all Federal JOC Programs and may be required in other public sectors. (Note… all cost data providers do not research these rates with equal due diligence, Four BT, LLC is follows best practices guidelines in this regard.)
Basic steps involved in Structuring a Job Order Contract and associated implementation include;
1. Strategic evaluation of objectives, goals, and appropriateness
2. Development of acquisition/procurement approach
3. Facility management/engineering planning
4. JOC procurement/award process
5. Work execution and contract administration
6. Monitoring

JOC and JOC UPB Implementations such as those based upon Four BT, LLC cost data and similar sources, as well as best management practices (BMPs) are acceptable in terms of being independent, objectives, and providing best value.

What to learn more about Structuring a Job Order Contract?

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
July 11, 2017July 11, 2017LEAN Operations Maintenance Management

LEAN Operations Maintenance Management

METRICS for LEAN Operations Maintenance Management


LEAN Operations Maintenance Management improves use of existing resources and better supports organizational needs.


METRICS for LEAN Operations Maintenance Management


METRICS for LEAN Operations Maintenance Management provide ongoing performance measurement to support informed, information-based, decision making and help to maximize the use of available resources

From a generic perspective, an effective measurement system includes:

  • Clearly defined, actionable, and measurable goals.
  • Key performance indicators that monitor the overall administration of O & M program, as well as individual projects / task orders, and all associated workflows, deliverables, and outcomes.
  • Established baselines enabling measurement of historical and current progress.
  • A basis of timely, accurate, repeatable, and verifiable information based upon standardized terms, definitions, and data architectures
  • Applicable reporting and feedback systems to support continuous improvement of processes, practices, and outcomes.
  • Leading Indicators (forecast future trends inside and outside the organization) as well as lagging indicators
  • Objective and unbiased information (not subject to manipulation) that is normalized (can be benchmarked against other organizations, departments, locations)
  • Statistically reliable
  • Unobtrusive (not disruptive of work or trust)
  • Appropriate (measures the right things)
  • Quantifiable
  • Verifiable/auditable.

The importance of performance measurement cannot be understated.  It is a fundamental element of any successful O & M program.

Specific O & M performance indicators (sample listing only)

  • Annualized Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) per building per gross area = Rate per square foot
  • Annualized TCO per building/Current replacement value = Percent of Current Replacement Value (CRV)
  • Annualized TCO per building/Net assignable square feet = Cost rate per net assignable square feet per building
  • Annualized TCO per building/Non-assignable square feet = Cost rate per non-assignable square feet per building
  • Annualized TCO per building/Building Interior square feet = Cost rate per interior square foot per building
  • Churn Rate
  • Utilization Rate
  • AI (Adaptation Index) or PI (Programmatic Index) = PR (Program Requirements)/CRV (Current Replacement Value)
  • Uptime or Downtime = Defined in percent, as amount of time asset is suitable for the program(s) served.
  • Facility Operating Gross Square Foot (GSF) Index (SAM Performance Indicator: APPA 2003)
  • Custodial Costs per square foot
  • Grounds Keeping Costs per square foot
  • Energy Usage is expressed as a ratio of British Thermal Units (BTUs) for each Gross Square Foot (GSF) of facility, group of facilities, site or portfolio = British Thermal Units BTUs /  Gross Area GSF
  • Utility Costs per square foot
  • Waste Removal Costs per square foot
  • Facility Operating Current Replacement Value (CRV) Index = Facility Operating CRV Index = Annual Facility Maintenance Operating Expenditures ($)/Current Replacement Value ($) (SAM Performance Indicator: APPA 2003)
  • Facility Operating GSF Index = Annual Facility Maintenance Operating Expenditures ($)/Gross Area (GSF)
  • Planned/Preventive Maintenance Costs per square foot
  • Emergency Maintenance Costs as a percentage of Annual Operations Expenditures.
  • Unscheduled/Unplanned Maintenance Costs as a percentage of Annual Operations Expenditures.
  • Repair costs (man hours and materials) as a percentage of Annual Operations Expenditures
  • FCI (Facility Condition Index) = DM (Deferred Maintenance) + CR (Capital Renewal)/CRV (Current Replacement Value)
  • Recapitalization Rate, Reinvestment Rate
  • Deferred Maintenance Backlog
  • Facilities Deterioration Rate
  • AI (Adaptive Index) or PI (Programmatic Index) = PR (Program Requirements)/CRV (Current Replacement Value)
  • FQI (Facility Quality Index) or Quality Index or Index = FCI (Facility Condition Index)+ AI (Adaptive Index)
  • Capital Renewal Index = Annual Capital Renewal and Renovation/Modernization Expenditure ($)/Current Replacement Value ($)Emerging Issues

LEARN MORE about METRICS for LEAN Operations Maintenance Management …

METRICS for LEAN Operations Maintenance Management

Tools for LEAN Operations Maintenance Management

O & M Checklists

Locally Researched OPEN & DETAILED Unit Line Item Costs

Training

LEAN Process

JOC, Job Order Contracting, is a proven LEAN Construction Delivery Management Method capable of delivering… financial transparency, collaboration, and 90%+ of projects on-time, on-budget, and to everyone’s satisfaction!   Learn more at www.4BT.com

 

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
July 10, 2017July 10, 2017Construction Collaboration Requires Common Terms, Uncategorized

Construction Collaboration Requires Common Terms

Efficiency is driven by collaboration and construction collaboration requires common terms,  as well as standardized, locally researched cost cost data, and LEAN delivery methods.

 

 

activity – task or tasks that contribute to completion of  deliverables (products and/or services)
agreement: a fully executed (signed by appropriate parties) between the demand organization and the provider of services and products that clearly describes requirements in sufficient detail, including conditions, costs, resources required, desired outputs, and associated workflows.
asset management: coordinated activity established by an organization to monitor, control, and  realize value from physical items.
asset: a physical item that has potential or actual value to an organization.  Examples: buildings, roadways, dams, bridges, utilities, mass transit, airports, equipment.
audit: systematic, independent documented, and verifiable process for obtaining evidence and evaluating it objectively to determine the extent to which the a product or service is providing intended results and/or meeting requirements.
benchmark: reference point or metric against which a process, product, or service can be measured.
benchmarking: process of comparing processes, performance, products, quality against practices/products of the a similar nature, under the same circumstances and with similar measures.
best practice; documented process or product developed by the user community, consisting of suppliers and end users working together for the purpose of establishing industry guidelines
built environment: buildings, land/landscaped areas, infrastructure and other construction works.
business case: document which summarizes the scope, benefits, costs and risks, of a proposed solution to a business/organizational.
business continuity: capability of the organization  to continue delivery of products/services at a acceptable predefined levels following disruptive incident
competence / competency – ability to apply knowledge, skills, and tools to achieve intended results in a  targeted area(s).  Examples specific to facility management include:  construction cost estimating, maintenance management, capital planning, space planning, project delivery, etc.
conformity:  documented/confirmed fulfillment of a requirement.
continual improvement: recurring activity to enhance performance, and a key aspect of LEAN.
corrective action: action/service to eliminate the cause of a nonconformity and to mitigate recurrence.
deliverable: measurable and verifiable outcome, result or item to be produced within a specific time frame to complete a project or part of a project
demand organization: an entity which has a need and the authority to incur costs to have requirements met via services and/or products.
documented information; information required to be controlled and maintained by an organization and the medium on which it is contained.
due diligence: compilation, comprehensive appraisal and validation of information of an organization required for assessing accuracy, commercial integrity, financial stability and functional competence, and integrity at the appropriate stage of the agreement sourcing process.
effectiveness: extent to which planned activities are realized and planned results achieved
emergency preparedness: capability to take actions that will effectively mitigate the consequences of an unplanned event than negatively impacts and organization.
end user: person or organization  which uses products and/or services from a supplier
entity: actual or abstract thing that exists, did exist, or might exist, including associations among these things
facility management, facilities management, FM: organizational function which integrates people, place,processes, technologies, competencies, business domains for the purpose of improving outcomes, including quality, service availability, productivity, comforts, safety, satisfaction, and return on investment in support of the organizational mission.
facility process:  an integrated workflow developed a and/or managed by a facility management.
facility service: support provision to the primary activities of an organization delivered by an internal or external providers.
infrastructure system:  facilities, physical equipment, built structures, and associates services and products and processes  needed for the operation of an organization.
in-source: an arrangement to move external service/product provisions to internal resources/products.
internal service provision, in-house service provision: delivery and management of by staff employed by the demand organization
key performance indicator, KPI: measure that provides essential information  a product or service is meeting predefined defined requirements.
life-cycle cost: total costs (in present-value terms) expected to be spent on an asset  during its operational existence, inclusive of demolition/recycling.
management system; set of interrelated or interacting elements of an organization  to establish policies and objectives and processes to achieve those objectives.
measurement: process  to determine a value
method statement: a document in which the service provider translates the demand  set out in the specification  and service level agreement into a delivery plan with resources, allocations and methodologies.
mobilization: phase to establish and implement all resources, tools, materials, information, information  and procedures prior to taking full responsibility for the facilities services and or construction services to be delivered as specified in the agreement.
monitoring: determining the status of a system, process, product, or service/activity.
need/requirement:  a stated or implied expectation, specific (stated, for example in documented/written or abstract, from the demand organization which is essential to enable the achievement of the core purpose and key objectives and goals.
nonconformity: non-fulfillment of a requirement.
objective: result to be achieved
open cost: transparent exchange of relevant information cost information between the facility management/construction/AE service provider and the demand organization
operational level; level at which activities are performed in a routine way in support of the organization’s unctions
organization: person or group of people that has its own functions with responsibilities, authorities and relationships to achieve its objectives and goals (examples: sole-proprietor, corporation, firm, enterprise, authority, partnership, charity or institution, or part or combination thereof, whether incorporated or not, public or private).
performance: a measurable result of an activity/product/service.
policy: intentions and direction of an organization,  as formally expressed by its senior management.
primary activities: actions that constitute the distinctive and indispensable  competencies of an organization in its value chain
process: set of interrelated or interacting activities which transforms inputs into outputs
quality: degree to which a set of inherent characteristics of an object fulfills organizational requirements.
real estate / real property:   land and/or buildings and/or physical structures.
risk: effect of uncertainty
service level agreement, SLA: document which has been agreed between the demand organization  and a service/product provider that defines performance, metrics,  and conditions of associated with the service/product.
service level: complete description of requirements of a service, product, technology process or systems with their defined characteristics and defined metrics that quantitatively define performance.
service provider organization: a provider that delivers one or more facility services hat is internal or external to the demand organization
service: time-perishable, intangible activity performed for an entity.
specification(s): detailed description of the required performance,  and/or technical requirements for services and/or products and processes  set out by the demand organization  to make clear to the service provider the requirements to be fulfilled.
strategic level; level at which an organization  defines its objectives and policies  and plans and assesses how to achieve its goals.
support service: an activity delivered in support of a core business/service of the organization.
sustainability; state of the global system, including environmental, social and economic aspects, in which the needs of the present are met without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs
system – contained set of interrelated processes, products, technologies and/or procedures.
tactical level; level at which an organization plans and manages the specific mechanisms and resources for operational delivery of  products/services.
vision: description of what an organization  wants to be and how it wants to be seen by stakeholders.
work station: location containing furniture and supporting equipment (telephony, IT and power connections), specifically designed or suitable for work-related activities and is suitable for current use.
workplace: physical location where work is performed.
zero-based budget; methodology which uses detailed asset lists and engineering and performance standards to assess resource, and market unit costs to create a total budget without reference to previous expenditure levels.

 

Construction Collaboration Requires Common Terms to drive productivity, satisfaction, quality, and overall better outcomes.

Job Order Contract Compliance

 

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
July 10, 2017July 10, 2017Minor New Construction

LEAN Construction for Facilities Renovation, Repair, Minor New Construction

LEAN Construction for Facilities Renovation, Repair, Minor New Construction

LEAN Construction for Facilities Renovation, Repair, Minor New Construction can delivery 90%+ of construction projects on-time, on-budget, and to the satisfaction of all parties involved.

This is possible if the processes and tools used are independent and objective,  and LEAN best management practices (BMPs) are adopted and maintained.

The two most widely known and used forms of LEAN construction are Integrated Project Delivery, IPD, and Job Order Contracting, JOC.   IPD is used primarily for major new construction due to implementation costs, while JOC is used for faciliites renovation, repair, and minor new construction.

Benefits of JOC:

  • Reduced procurement costs and time
  • Shorter overall project delivery times
  • Faster response times
  • Improve participant satisfaction
  • Long term, mutually beneficial relationships among contractors and real property owners / facilities management
  • Financial transparency
  • Few change orders
  • Risk reduction
  • Virtual elimination of legal disputes
  • Focus upon outcomes
  • Value-based procurement
  • Reduced overhead for both owner and contractor
  • Performance-based reward system

JOC Tools

  • Independent, objective, locally research JOC unit price book (preferable to national average price books and adjustment factors)

LEAN Construction for Facilities Renovation, Repair, Minor New Construction

  • Ongoing training
  • Enabling software
  • JOC program audits
  • Independent owner estimates
  • Owner’s Technical Specifications (NOTE:  Special/custom technical specifications for JOC should NOT be used.  Owner should simply use their existing specifications.  Should an owner not have construction specifications, they are readily available from at least two major and reputable sources – Arcon/Masterspec, BDS/SpecLink).

LEAN Construction for Facilities Renovation, Repair, Minor New Construction may not be for everyone…

Barriers to Success

  • Owners without appropriate leadership or competence
  • Inability of owner or contractor to work collaboratively (Note:  The primary issue with owners is typically competence, while some contracts may be unwilling to be transparent with costs, work methods, etc.
  • Using JOC as a method to bypass traditional procurement versus a best value delivery system
  • Excessive reliance upon JOC consultants (IMPORTANT NOTE: A JOC consultant should NEVER be paid a fee based upon JOC construction volume and also be in a position to approve JOC projects/task orders.)
  • Existence of so-call open book JOC and competitive JOCs.   An open book JOC is NOT a JOC by definition as costs are derived from subcontractors in a typical design-bid-build fashion and are not fully visible, defensible and transparent.  Competitive JOCs are contrary to the philosophy of JOC as they are cost-based not value-based.

JOC is a proven construction delivery method, with a 30+ year successful track record.  Learn more today!

Typical JOC Workflow

 

 

Executing a Job Order Contract

 

 

LEAN Construction for Facilities Renovation, Repair, Minor New Construction

 

LEAN Construction for Facilities Renovation, Repair, Minor New Construction

Learn more about  LEAN Construction for Facilities Renovation, Repair, Minor New Construction …

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
July 8, 2017LEAN Construction Improves Success

LEAN Construction Improves Success


LEAN Construction Improves Success

LEAN construction delivers over 90% of projects on-time, on-budget, and to the satisfaction of all parties.   The most widely used types are Integrated Project Delivery, IPD for major new construction, and Job Order Contracting, JOC, for renovation, repair, and minor new construction.

LEAN Construction Improves Success
Lean construction requires a balance of strategic, tactical and operational considerations. Within each category, smaller, often day-to-day elements support the process.

In both cases, Owners must be capable and demonstrate leadership and outsourcing management is NOT a viable option.

To succeed with lean construction, many organizations must change their daily
policies and practices—a challenging task that requires ongoing attention.

All participants should make a long-term commitment to continuous improvement.

Lean construction is most successful when organizations implement it at a gradual pace and with realistic expectations.

Benefits don’t occur immediately or even during the first year.
Failures will occur. Learn from them. Accept input from all participants. Adapt
processes and requirements to each organization and its capabilities. Build a
repository of best practices, knowledge and actionable information.
Keep communications open, keep learning and keep improving

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
July 7, 2017April 4, 2019Uncategorized

Job Order Contract Compliance

Public sector facilities managers have a fiduciary responsibility is to secure maximum value for funding allocated for building and infrastructure repair, renovation, maintenance, sustainability, and construction.

Job Order Contract Compliance

Order Contracting can provide significant gains in productivity and improve quality, some government agencies.  However, some public sector organizations are using JOC to simply bypass traditional procurement methods, or are ignoring EDGAR requirements.

The result is that benefits anticipated benefits to be gained by JOC have not materialized in these instances.  In fact, excessive administrative costs, poor financial visibility and transparency, and increased potential for fraud have surfaced for improperly designed and managed JOC Programs.

For JOC to be successful,  real property owners must be fully trained in JOC fundamentals, inclusive of LEAN principles,  actively participate in JOC programs, and independently audit JOC projects and programs.

The exclusive use of JOC consultant to “manage” a JOC program, be paid a percentage of JOC construction volume, and be involved in approving JOC projects, is contrary to the core aspects JOC philosophy.

Governments can adopt various strategies to optimize resources and renovation, repair, and minor new construction projects.   A JOC framework can certainly aid in that goal, if the process used is supported by independent, objective, and best value tools and best management practices.

Learn more…

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
June 29, 2017Move Beyond Spreadsheets for Job Order Contracting

Move Beyond Spreadsheets for Job Order Contracting

Move Beyond Spreadsheets for Job Order Contracting…. When it comes to collaborative and efficient Job Order Contracting for real property portfolios, facilities professionals learn that spreadsheets lack key capabilities…

  • Built-in cost locally researched line item cost data complete with line item modifiers, demolition line items, and organized/maintained in CSI Masterformat.
  • Ability to create, store, and reuse custom construction cost detailed line items
  • Objective project prioritization
  • Centralized data storage
  • An ability to scale
  • Real-time collaboration
  • Controlled data access
  • Everyone working on current versions/information

Move Beyond Spreadsheets for Job Order Contracting

Please contact us learn more about the limits of spreadsheets and how you can overcome them to improve your Job Order Contract!

Move Beyond Spreadsheets for Job Order Contracting to improve outcomes.. productivity, transparency, collaboration, quality, and satisfaction.

Free Trial to Qualified Organizations!

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
June 27, 2017June 27, 2017Facilities Management Key Performance Indicators

Facilities Management Key Performance Indicators

List of Facilities Management Key Performance Indicators / Metrics:

(1) Thermal comfort (e.g. temperature, mean radiant temperature, humidity and air speed)

(2) Visual comfort (e.g. illuminance and glare)

(3) Acoustic comfort (e.g. reverberation)

(4) Indoor air quality (e.g. total volatile organic compound, CO2 level, concentration of radon)

(5) Percentage users dissatisfied

(6) Number of users’ complaints per year Financial

(7) Percentage cost of personnel

(8) Percentage cost of subcontractors

(9) Percentage of contractor cost

(10) Actual costs within budgeted costs

(11) Direct maintenance cost

(12) Breakdown severity

(13) Equipment replacement value (ERV)

(14) Maintenance stock turnover

(15) Percentage of maintenance material cost

(16) Percentage of corrective maintenance cost

(17) Percentage of preventive maintenance cost

(18) Percentage of condition based maintenance cost

(19) O&M cost per building area

(20) O&M cost per capacity of installation

(21) Cost of equipment added or replaced

(22) Energy expenditure per building area

(23) Energy expenditure per person

(24) Total safety and security expenditure

(25) Security expenditure per building area

(26) Security expenditure per person

(27) Building income per building area

(28) Total rentable value of the building Task and equipment related

(29) Work request response rate

(30) Scheduling intensity

(31) Manpower utilization rate

(32) Manpower efficiency

(33) Manpower utilization index

(34) Preventive maintenance ratio (PMR)

(35) Percentage of reactive (corrective) work

(36) Percentage of proactive (preventive) work

(37) Percentage of condition based maintenance work

(38) Percentage of improvement work

(39) Number of manhours per capacity of installation

(40) Number completed work orders per staff

(41) Area maintained per maintenance staff

(42) Quality of scheduling

(43) Schedule realization rate

(44) Schedule compliance

(45) Work order turnover

(46) Backlog size

(47) Urgent repair request index (URI)

(48) Corrective maintenance time

(49) Preventive maintenance time

(50) Response time for maintenance

(51) Percentage compliance with required response time

(52) Number of maintenance induced interruptions

(53) Failure/breakdown frequency (number of equipment faults per month or per year)

(54) Mean time between failures (MTBF)

(55) Mean time to repair (MTTR)

(56) Availability

(57) Efficiency of facilities

(58) Gross floor area under safety and security patrol Environmental

(59) Energy use index (EUI)

(60) Energy consumption per person

(61) Greenhouse gas emission per building area

(62) Energy audit

Facilities Management Key Performance Indicators

(Sources: British Standards Institution, 2007; Building Services Research and Information Association, 2011; Campbell, 1995; Chan et al., 2001; Electrical & Mechanical Services Department, 2007; Electrical & Mechanical Services Department and Environmental Protection Department, 2010; Hinks and McNay, 1999; Ho et al., 2000; Hong Kong Quality Assurance Agency, 2012; Lai and Yik, 2006; Lavy et al., 2010; Leung et al., 2005; Lukzkendorf and Lorenz, 2006; Muchiri et al, 2011; Parida and Chattopadhyay, 2007; Tsang et al., 1999; Vesela and Michael, 2001). Physical (impact on customer satisfaction)

Learn more…

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
June 27, 2017Collaborative Facilities Management

Collaborative Facilities Management

Collaborative facilities management can, and must…

  1. foster a better understanding of how the built environment influences human behavior, health and organizational productivity
  2. promote the strategic and operational value of LEAN, collaborative facilities management practices in meeting emerging environmental and economic challenges
  3. forge closer links and collaboration between the financial, technical, sociological and operational aspects of facilities management through an integrated resource management and service delivery approach
  4. disseminate proven business process, tools, and research specific to best practice facilities management to a wider audience, and
  5. support a forum for the exchange of know-how and best practice in education, research and industry that addresses physical and functional aspects of the built environment.

Collaborative Facilities Management

Learn more…

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
June 26, 2017June 27, 2017Facilities Management Operations & Management

Facilities Operations & Maintenance Management

Facilities Operations & Maintenance Management considerations span several areas.

A partial list is shown below:

  • Organizational Strategy, Goals, Required Outcomes
  • Budgeting/Capital Planning
  • LEAN Business Models and Methods
  • Multiple Competencies, Business Processes, and Activities
  • Supporting Technologies and Tools
  • Education, Training, and Support Services
  • Metrics/Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
  • Common Data Environment (CDE)

Facilities Operations & Maintenance Management

Organizational Strategy, Goals, Required Outcomes

The full support of an organization and associated service providers is required in order to deliver provide a level of Facilities Operations & Maintenance Management in concert with their mission and goals.

A comprehensive written facilities management operations and maintenance manual and/or execution guide is a fundamental requirement.  It should be written with LEAN process fundamentals in mind that focus upon BEST VALUE outline measurable desired OUTCOMES.

Facilities Operations & Maintenance Management requires and appropriate and ongoing consideration of PEOPLE, PROCESS, INFORMATION, and TECHNOLOGY is needed during the development of the Operations Manual / Execution Plan.

Facilities Operations & Maintenance Management

 

 

 

Budgeting/Capital Planning

Post construction costs average 80% of total facilities investment thus emphasis upon O &M budgeting and capital planning provides major benefits.

 

 

Most organizations are historically first-cost driven, a bias that negatively affects overall return on investment.   Appropriate decision-support tools and services (technology, data, and consulting/education/support) must be included to enable consideration of life-cycle costs and financial resource prioritization.

Determining the priority of capital reinvestment into facilities based upon a life-cycle perspective has proven to provide the highest likelihood of positive overall results.   Many organizations spend up to 80% of operations and maintenance funds on emergency, unplanned projects and/or projects that provide limited true value to an organization.   With proper planning and management processes in place, this ration can be reversed.  This beneficial “shift” in resource allocation however is impossible without current actionable information, appropriate decision-support tools and appropriate strategies among all participants and stakeholders.

LEAN Business Models and Methods

The productivity, quality, value and satisfaction associated with any facility renovation, repair, maintenance, sustainability, or new construction project are directly linked to the processes employed.   Promoting awareness and education of LEAN construction practices and associated construction delivery methods among Owners, Contractors, Engineers, Architects, and Oversight Groups is key to efficient management of the built environment.

Within the LEAN Construction / Collaborative Construction Delivery process framework, emphasis is upon BEST VALUE OUTCOMES as the can be achieved through the leveraging of expertise of all project participants and stakeholders from initial concept and throughout the entire life-cycle of the built structures.

 

A common and minimum body of knowledge defined as a standard of excellence is key to reversing the current norm of waste, and other negative economic and environmental issues attributed to the Architecture, Engineering, Construction, Operations, Owner (AECOO) sector.

 

LEAN, BEST VALUE CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY METHODS[1] have been available for decades, but only practiced by fractional percentage of Real Property Owners and service providers.   The reason for limited adoption of these methods, capable of enabling more projects to be completed on-time and on-budget, and with higher levels of quality and satisfaction, is simple.  It’s a sector-wide lack of awareness and education.

The most widely used collaborative construction delivery methods are JOB ORDER CONTRACTING, JOC for renovation, repair, and maintenance activities and INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY, IPD for major new construction.

As JOC is a form of IPD, directly applicable to operations and maintenance, a typical workflow for job order contract project is shown below.

LEAN Construction methods share has the following characteristics;

  • Performance-based reward based upon achievement of specified goals.
  • Defined work flows, data formats, and technologies which enable experiences with the principles and techniques of state of work definition, cost estimating, project management, and performance analysis to be reported, discussed, documented, and reused.
  • Fostering and requirements for ongoing training
  • Systems to maintain standards of proficiency and performance
  • Required cooperation among internal and external project participants with common or related purposes, in furtherance of project success
  • Clear and transparent mechanisms for all participants to collectively discuss and comment on subjects of common interest
  • Common and shared standards for terminology, definitions, conduct and application of all procedures and policies
  • Shared risk/reward
  • Mutual respect
  • Continuous improvement

Mulitiple Competencies, Business Processes, and Activities

Facilities O & M management spans multiple competencies (core skills), business process (asset management practices/industries), and activities.   A partial listing is shown below with links to additional information.

Facilities Operations & Maintenance Management

Competencies/activities

  • Strategic planning
  • Cost estimating
  • Procurement/bidding
  • Construction
  • Space planning
  • Operations
  • Planned, unplanned, user requested maintenance
  • Repairs, improvements/upgrades, retrofits, replacements
  • Programming

 

Business Processes

  • Capital planning and management
  • Construction project delivery methodology
  • Space management
  • Operations and maintenance
  • Inventory and maintenance disposition management

Supporting Technologies and Tools

Multiple technologies and tools can be used to lower the cost of establishing and deploying facilities management operations and management best practices consistently.   A partial listing is shown below, with appropriate links to additional information where available.

Technologies

Application Software

  • Building Automation Systems (BAS)
  • Building Information Modeling, Model, and Management Systems (BIM)
  • Capital Planning and Management Systems (CPMS)
  • Computer-aided Facilities Management Systems (CAFM)
  • Computerized Maintenance Management Systems (CMMS)
  • LEAN Cost Estimating, Procurement, & Construction Project Delivery and Management Systems
  • Geographical Information Systems (GIS)
  • Integrated Workplace Management Systems (IWMS)

Tools

  • Construction code databases
  • Construction cost databases
  • Data formats: PDF, Graphics (2D, 3D, PNG, JPG, …)
  • Industry specific glossaries
  • Industry Standards (ISO, NIST)
  • O & M Execution Guide
  • O & M Manuals
  • Standardized data architectures (Cobie, Masterformat, Uniformat, Omniclass)
  • Technical construction specification

Education, Training, and Support Services

Enhancing the understanding and appreciation specifically within the below areas will aid in improving productivity, quality, and satisfaction across the AECOO[2] sector, thereby bringing facilities management operations and maintenance to a higher level of performance:

  • Collaborative methods
  • Leadership without excessive management
  • Linking global oversight with local knowledge and execution
  • Life-cycle / total cost of ownership management techniques

Training and education must be required and ongoing for all stakeholders.

Metrics/Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

Ongoing performance measurement supports informed, information-based, decision making and improve resource allocation targeting facilities operations and maintenance.

From a generic perspective, an effective measurement system includes:

  • Clearly defined, actionable, and measurable goals.
  • Key performance indicators that monitor the overall administration of O & M program, as well as individual projects / task orders, and all associated workflows, deliverables, and outcomes.
  • Established baselines enabling measurement of historical and current progress.
  • A basis of timely, accurate, repeatable, and verifiable information based upon standardized terms, definitions, and data architectures
  • Applicable reporting and feedback systems to support continuous improvement of processes, practices, and outcomes.
  • Leading Indicators (forecast future trends inside and outside the organization) as well as lagging indicators
  • Objective and unbiased information (not subject to manipulation) that is normalized (can be benchmarked against other organizations, departments, locations)
  • Statistically reliable
  • Unobtrusive (not disruptive of work or trust)
  • Appropriate (measures the right things)
  • Quantifiable
  • Verifiable/auditable.

The importance of performance measurement cannot be understated.  It is a fundamental element of LEAN management practices.

Sample O & M performance indicators:

  • Annualized Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) per building per gross area = Rate per square foot
  • Annualized TCO per building/Current replacement value = Percent of Current Replacement Value (CRV)
  • Annualized TCO per building/Net assignable square feet = Cost rate per net assignable square feet per building
  • Annualized TCO per building/Non-assignable square feet = Cost rate per non-assignable square feet per building
  • Annualized TCO per building/Building Interior square feet = Cost rate per interior square foot per building
  • Churn Rate
  • Utilization Rate
  • AI (Adaptation Index) or PI (Programmatic Index) = PR (Program Requirements)/CRV (Current Replacement Value)
  • Uptime or Downtime = Defined in percent, as amount of time asset is suitable for the program(s) served.
  • Facility Operating Gross Square Foot (GSF) Index (SAM Performance Indicator: APPA 2003)
  • Custodial Costs per square foot
  • Grounds Keeping Costs per square foot
  • Energy Usage is expressed as a ratio of British Thermal Units (BTUs) for each Gross Square Foot (GSF) of facility, group of facilities, site or portfolio = British Thermal Units BTUs /  Gross Area GSF
  • Utility Costs per square foot
  • Waste Removal Costs per square foot
  • Facility Operating Current Replacement Value (CRV) Index = Facility Operating CRV Index = Annual Facility Maintenance Operating Expenditures ($)/Current Replacement Value ($) (SAM Performance Indicator: APPA 2003)
  • Facility Operating GSF Index = Annual Facility Maintenance Operating Expenditures ($)/Gross Area (GSF)
  • Planned/Preventive Maintenance Costs per square foot
  • Emergency Maintenance Costs as a percentage of Annual Operations Expenditures.
  • Unscheduled/Unplanned Maintenance Costs as a percentage of Annual Operations Expenditures.
  • Repair costs (man hours and materials) as a percentage of Annual Operations Expenditures
  • FCI (Facility Condition Index) = DM (Deferred Maintenance) + CR (Capital Renewal)/CRV (Current Replacement Value)
  • Recapitalization Rate, Reinvestment Rate
  • Deferred Maintenance Backlog
  • Facilities Deterioration Rate
  • AI (Adaptive Index) or PI (Programmatic Index) = PR (Program Requirements)/CRV (Current Replacement Value)
  • FQI (Facility Quality Index) or Quality Index or Index = FCI (Facility Condition Index)+ AI (Adaptive Index)
  • Capital Renewal Index = Annual Capital Renewal and Renovation/Modernization Expenditure ($)/Current Replacement Value ($)Emerging Issues

[1] The construction project delivery method, or project delivery method is the process established to define, cost, procure, execute, and manage ) O & M and other construction/service tasks.  As there are numerous and disparate operations and maintenance projects facing real property owners and their service providers, is it critical that they be accomplished in a timely and cost effective manner.

 

[2] AECOO-Architecture, Engineering, Construction, Operations, Owner

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
June 21, 2017Open Data Job Order Contracting

Open Data Job Order Contracting

Open Data Job Order Contracting  should be a requirement for any JOC Program.

Open Data Job Order Contracting

WHAT….

Open Data for JOC means…

  1. Independent sourcing…. to assure objectivity
  2. Locally researched…  to assure value
  3. Transparency…  ability to see all components – labor, material, and equipment for each JOC line item task.
  4. Full use…   right for owners/contractors to create custom line items from parent line items and/or to expand upon cost data set size and value with appropriate approvals processes in place and followed.

Note:  A national average cost data book is note considered open data from a JOC perspective.

WHY…

  1. Compliance…  cost data sourcing must be verifiable and assured to have no link to construction contractors or any other party that would benefit improperly.
  2. Value…  cost data must reflect tasks and costs that are commonly incurred in the specific locations that work for the JOC tasks is performed.
  3. Retained knowledge…  Full detailed transparency and the ability to create new information assure that learnings from all JOC participants are retained.
  4. Uniform language among staff and service providers
  5. Shared vision
  6. Informed decisions
  7. Managed risk
  8. Improved efficiency

Learn more about the OpenCost Approach…

open data job order contracting
LEAN Collaborative Construction Practices Construction Cost Estimating

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
June 19, 2017Improving Job Order Contracts, Uncategorized

Improving Job Order Contracts

Improving Job Order Contracts to maximize renovation, repair, and construction productivity is easy if you have the right approach, tools, and training.

Improving Job Order Contracts can help to assure that over 90% of renovation, repair, and minor new construction projects are completed on-time, on-budget, and to everyone’s satisfaction.   This is only possible, however, if the Job Order Contracts are designed, implemented, and managed properly.

Here are the some major issues to take a look at when Improving Job Order Contracts..

1- LEAN Construction Delivery Approach

LEAN Construction Delivery can significantly improve quality, productivity, and overall levels of satisfaction.   That said, some JOC Programs, especially at the County, State, and Local Government levels have bee set up simple as a means to bypass traditional procurement versus truly establish LEAN collaborative construction delivery processes.

Real property owners must be directly providing leadership and participate in day-to-day functions, and not rely upon a JOC Consultant to provide a management role.

Improving Job Order Contracts

2- Cloud Based Collaboration Tools

Cloud technology best enables internal and external teams to be connected, and have access to current and actional information from anywhere, anytime.

LEAN collaborative project delivery models need to work in a shared space  so that decisions, updates and communications are simultaneously and instantly applied, flagged, and tracked.

Improving Job Order Contracts

3 – Carbon Footprint Reduction

According to the International Energy Agency, almost 30% of worldwide energy is attributable to buildings (40% of total in energy in the United States), and will increase 1.5% year through 2040 to almost 50%. The United States is largest user of energy for commercial use.  Building energy use, and associated renovation, repair, and sustainability is therefore the top priority.  Job order contracting can assist all forms of organizations to expedite the numerous projects to meet sustainability goals.

Improving Job Order Contracts

 

3 – Financial Visibility & Transparency

Locally researched detailed unit price cost data is key to improved financial visibility and transparency.   National average unit price commercial construction cost books have their purpose, however, for JOC, you need more.    Check our OpenCost Advantage!

 

Improving Job Order Contracts
Improving Job Order Contracts – Learn More…

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
June 14, 2017Job Order Contracting in the Cloud

Job Order Contracting in the Cloud

Job Order Contacting in the Cloud helps you to deliver more renovation, repair, and minor new construction projects on-time, on-budget, and to everyone’s satisfaction.

Job Order Contracting in the Cloud is simply better, faster, and more secure.


Sure, you can continue to use spreadsheets or national average cost databases and their associated little cost calculators, or you can use powerful, locally research construction cost data developed by teams with years of JOC expertise... AND…. get easy-to-use modern cloud technology!!!

Better. Faster. Stronger. Four BT’s (4BT) cloud-based JOC management software empowers Owners, Contractors, and Subcontractors new, innovative ways.


The demand for faster, more accurate and objective JOB ORDER CONTRACTING systems led to the creation of 4BT-CE cloud-based JOC software.  

Please review the following information, and give us a cal to better understand the true value of these tools  and how they can benefit our organization.

A few facts about the Cloud-based Job Order Contract Management

  • Cloud-Based JOC Software Improves Security – Traditional software can be more vulnerable to cyberattacks and data loss. Advanced cybersecurity measures reduce the risk of cyberattacks, and continuous penetration testing ensures maximum cybersecurity.   Data storage on a remote server with redundancy promotes information integrity and durability.
  •  Cloud-Based JOC  Management Software Reduces Issues During Implementation – Startup costs and time requirements are significantly lower.
  • Cloud-Based JOC Software Promotes Collaboration –  Collaboration is the cornerstone of improved productivity, quality, and timely service delivery. 4BT-CE enables real-time collaboration using current information.   Everyone is literally on the same

Why Wait?  Begin Putting It All Together Today!

The goal of facilities management  is to provide the greatest return on investment for dollars spent in delivering physical infrastructure in support of your organization’s mission.    Providing internal and external managers and service providers the information they need at any given time is CRITICAL to this goal.

4BT tools help make this possible, connecting all JOC participants and stakeholders with current actionable information and tools.

Job Order Contracting in the Cloud

Job Order Contracting in the Cloud

Job Order Contracting in the Cloud

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
June 13, 2017June 13, 2017JOB ORDER CONTRACT PROCUREMENT STRATEGY

Job Order Contract Procurement Strategy

JOB ORDER CONTRACT PROCUREMENT STRATEGY

A JOB ORDER CONTRACT PROCUREMENT STRATEGY spans process of soliciting/marketing, contractor selection, and award of a Job Order Contract involves technical and business strategies.
The facility management authority and procurement/contracting/purchasing (purchasing) meet and discuss items such as timing (JOC start and end dates), available funding, access to local contractors, as well as any and all additional resources needed to achieve quality on-time and on-budget performance.

Other authorities in the organization must participate in its development to ensure that all objectives and interests are met (examples: legal, quality assurance, small business, building users, planners).
The JOB ORDER CONTRACT PROCUREMENT STRATEGY and approach should be tailored to JOC construction services required.
The acquisition starts with the needs and feasibility study and is complete once the decision has been made to implement a JOC contract. An acquisition timeline should be developed.


JOB ORDER CONTRACT PROCUREMENT STRATEGY TIMING / Months

JOB ORDER CONTRACT PROCUREMENT STRATEGY


JOB ORDER CONTRACT PROCUREMENT STRATEGY is an ongoing activity, the plan is continuously updated.
Components of an acquisition plan within the overall JOB ORDER CONTRACT PROCUREMENT STRATEGY;
 Statement of Need. Results of the need analyzed.
 Surrounding Conditions. All significant conditions, such as requirements for compatibility with existing laws, regulations, contracts.
 Capabilities Being Acquired. Capabilities and performance goals being sought – on-demand services, quality, and expertise.
 Performance Period. Initial proposed award date, term, and option years as applicable.
 Plan of Action Sources. Research market for skilled and otherwise qualified contractors and subcontractors.
 Source Selection Procedures. Method(s) for rating and selecting awardee(s).
 Contracting Considerations. Discuss features of the JOC contract and any special clauses and/or requirements.
 Multiple Awards. It the JOC involves multiple contractors/awardees, it must be determined how selection per task order will be made.
 Budgeting and Funding. Assure process is in place for funding the JOC throughout its term and appropriate provisions are in place should the JOC be terminated.
 Management Information System / Technology / Software Requirements. Discuss cost estimating or other software that is to be used as well as formats for reporting.
 Quality Assurance: Discuss quality requirements and evaluation procedures and warranties.
 Owner Furnished Property. A JOC acquisition may require the contractor to use or occupy owner property, including an on-site work facility, and or dedicated workspaces.
 Owner Furnished Information. Owner manuals, drawings, and other data to be provided to prospective offerors and awarded contractors.
 Contractor Computer Equipment. The equipment specifications to support the pricing (JOC UPB) software must be planned for and identified in advance. The contractor must equip itself with compatible computer hardware and software so that information can be shared, as required.
 Environmental Considerations. Discuss the proposed resolution of environmental issues and any environment-related requirements to be included in the solicitation and contract. Discuss whether any environmental considerations are to be separately treated when individual task orders are issued, and whether contractual coverage will be required.
 Security Consideration. If the contractor’s contractual responsibilities require the use of secured areas, discuss how adequate security will be established, maintained, and monitored.  Discuss how security clearances for the prime and any subcontractors will be handled and the responsibilities of both the owner and the prime contractor regarding them.
 Energy Considerations. Discuss energy conservation considerations, including whether specific coverage will be required in the solicitation and in selecting the JOC unit price book.
 Standardization. Discuss any standardization programs to be recognized in the contract.
 Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Discuss how OSHA requirements will be met in the solicitation and contract, including the need for special contract clauses.
 Source Selection Evaluation Plan. Because the selection of a contractor is based on other factors in addition to price, the nature and structure of the source selection process should be discussed to ensure that adequate planning occurs.
 Contract Structure. Discuss the initial period and option(s) structure of the contract. Discuss the responsibilities of the purchasing authority and technical JOC staff members in monitoring contractor performance.
 Bonding Requirements. Discuss any bonding requirements on the part of the contractor.
 Preproposal Conference.
 Job Order / Task Order Placement. Discuss the appointment and training of the purchasing and technical personnel. Discuss the location and schedule of training so that it will be completed before contract activation. A JOC basic training course, followed by advanced and ongoing (annual) training is an important consideration.
 Assignment of Source Selection Authority. As with any solicitation of the magnitude of a JOC contract, the appointment of the source selection authority (SSA) needs to be addressed.
 Assignment of Purchasing Responsibilities. Assure roles and responsibilities associated with contract operations, including issuance of task orders are planned and discussed to ensure smooth and orderly accomplishment.


Job Order Contract Acquisition Milestones
 Needs Analysis
 Strategy
 Acquisition Plan Approval, as required.
 Statement of Work
 Specifications & JOC Unit Price Book / Data Requirements
 Small Business Considerations
 Purchase Request
 Preparation of Acquisition Package
 Obtain Pre-solicitation Approvals (as required)


Review Panel
 Source Selection Evaluation Plan Approval (as required)
 Issue Solicitation
 Preproposal Conference
 Evaluate proposals, audits & field reports, as required
 Prepare Discussion and Clarification Statements
 Prepare Discussion and Competitive Range Decision
 Request & Review Revised Proposals (Discussions Process)
 Request Final Revised Offer
 Prepare Selection Decision
 Contract Award
 Debriefing(s)

Four BT, LLC – Independent, Objective, Best Value LEAN Construction Job Order Contracting Solutions
www.4BT.us

JOB ORDER CONTRACT PROCUREMENT STRATEGY

Learn more…

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
June 13, 2017Delivering Better Facilities Through LEAN Construction and Owner Leadership

Delivering Better Facilities Through LEAN Construction and Owner Leadership

Delivering Better Facilities Through LEAN Construction and Owner Leadership …  The ability to significantly improve how facilities are constructed, managed and operated depends largely on whether owners provide high levels of leadership, knowledge and collaborative support.

Delivering Facilities Through LEAN Construction and Owner Leadership

Delivering Better Facilities through Lean Construction and Owner Leadership NIBS 2017

Delivering Better Facilities Through LEAN Construction and Owner Leadership enables major improvements in productivity, quality, and overall satisfaction.

Owners are in the best position to validate appropriate planning, capability, tools, information and processes. They can require all stakeholders to collaborate, be transparent, build strong relationships and drive higher productivity and value for the facility.

Productivity in the architecture, engineering, construction, owners and operations (AECOO) industry lags behind other industries. Given the impact that facilities have on the financial and operational performance of an organization, increasing productivity can make a big difference to the bottom line. However, to achieve better results, owners must be more involved.

Traditional construction delivery methods (e.g., design-bid-build and lowest-bidder) and newer methods (design-build) are not up to the task. Ultimately, these methods fail to integrate the unique variables of each construction project.

Lean construction is a solution for the facilities industry, as it has been for other industries facing similar struggles. Lean Construction Basics Lean construction delivery provides a process framework to improve outcomes. When properly implemented, more than 90% of lean projects (renovation, repair and new construction) are on time, on budget and satisfactory for all parties.

Learn more….

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
June 12, 2017Job Order Contracting Benefits

Job Order Contracting Benefits

Job Order Contracting Benefits
Job Order Contracting benefits all participants and stakeholders – facilities management, DPW, engineering, real property owners, facility users, procurement, contractors and oversight groups.

JOC concept has several key advantages over the traditional design-bid-build, design-build, and virtually all other construction construction delivery method, exclusive of integrated project delivery, IPD.   That said, JOC is a form of IPD that specifically targets renovation, repair, and minor new construction.  IPD, on the other hand, targets major new construction.

Though the benefit of Job Order Contracting are significant, users of this method typically undergo a change management process in order to be able to fully adopt and deploy all related processes, procedures, and tools.

Job Order Contracting Benefits

  • Response Time – faster response to client/end user requests for construction services
  • Shorter Overall Project Delivery Time
  • Reduction is Administrative Burden and/or Costs
  • Lower Design Costs
  • Higher Constructability
  • Fewer Change Orders
  • Virtual Elimination of Legal Disputes
  • Higher Percentage of Dollars Spent on Actual Construction
  • Reduced Deferred Maintenance
  • More Productive Use of Internal Facilities Management Staff
  • Enhanced Financial Visibility
  • Improved Quality
  • Higher Levels of Satisfaction Among ALL participants
  • Long Term Relationships
  • Benefit of Local Knowledge without Sacrificing Global Oversight
  • Quantitative Metrics
  • Availability of Tools and Enabling Technology

Learn More…

Job Order Contracting Benefits

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
June 12, 2017June 12, 2017LEAN Collaborative Construction Practices Construction Cost Estimating

LEAN Collaborative Construction Practices Construction Cost Estimating

LEAN Collaborative Construction Practices  Construction Cost Estimating

Four BT, LLC

LEAN Collaborative Construction Practices Construction Cost Estimating
LEAN Collaborative Construction Practices Construction Cost Estimating

Efficient and best management practice construction cost estimating and ongoing construction project/program management is impossible without proper early and ongoing planning, inclusive of the collaborative and competent involvement of all construction project participants and stakeholders.  

 

LEAN Collaborative Construction Practices Construction Cost Estimating – Within this structure the Real Property Owner must demonstrate appropriate leadership skills and manage the appropriate selected team of internal and external service providers and stakeholders without excessive control.   Continuous monitoring, process improvement, and resource development should be a central focus.

 

In general terms are an actionable construction cost estimate should reflect approximate costs developed for a complete schedule of detailed construction line item tasks/activities after consideration of all physical and functional requirements and possible cost variations.  

Thus the process of generating an actionable construction cost estimate can be defined as a quantitative assessment process generates a detailed line item construction cost estimate.

There are multiple alternative forms of estimates including conceptual, square foot, building, system, life-cycle, etc.   The primary focus here is upon detailed line item construction cost estimates as they should be considered mandatory before any final construction project is approved and begun.

LEAN Collaborative Construction Practices Construction Cost Estimating

A few general principles greatly assist in the development of actionable construction cost estimates:

·         Early and ongoing participation of all stakeholders (designers, architects, engineers, construction contractors, facilities management, building users, oversight groups, etc.)

·         Full line item descriptions in plain English using industry standard terms.

·         Organization by standard data architecture (Uniformat, MasterFormat, Omniclass etc.)

·         Full details of specific labor, material, and equipment costs and type.

·         Transparency, sharing, and collaboration among all stakeholders

·         Independently and objectively locally researched cost information (Note: Do not rely exclusively upon national average cost data, even data with localization factors.  Do not rely exclusively upon subcontractor costs.

·         Assure all cost information is updated to current location, time, requirements, and conditions.

General review of the Cost Types associated with LEAN Collaborative Construction Practices Construction Cost Estimating

Variable Cost – Any cost that changes with the amount of production or the amount of work. Examples: cost of materials, power, water, labor

Fixed Cost – Cost that does not change as production changes is a fixed cost. Examples: mobilization/set up cost, rental or rental of equipment or machinery.

LEAN Collaborative Construction Practices Construction Cost Estimating

Direct Cost- Costs are directly attributable to the work on the project. Example: team travel, team wages, recognition, and costs of materials used on the project.

Indirect Cost – Overhead items or costs incurred for the benefit of more than one project are indirect costs. Example: Corporate Tax, Fringe Benefit Tax.

Opportunity Cost – Cost associate by choosing a particular method or project over another an opportunity cost.

Sunk Cost – Costs are the ones which were already spent on the project earlier and generally not considered when future decisions are made.

Types of Estimating and Associated Key Terms

 

Analogous Estimating – Using the actual cost of previous or similar projects as the basis for estimating the cost of the current project.

Researched Costs/Cost Rates – Actual per unit labor and material resource rates are that are collated or estimated.  May include subcontractor quotes, current/previous relevant contracts, and commercial cost databases.

Bottom-up Estimating (also detailed line item estimating- Individual schedule activities, and/or task, that are estimated to the smallest reasonable level of detail to provide the greatest level of confidence.  All costs are then aggregated and used for reporting, tracking and control purposes. Individual activity/task cost consciousness is of prime importance.

Parametric Estimating – This technique uses historical cost with current project variables that are determined. This is a highly accurate method as it requires clarity in current project variables.

Cost Estimating Software – Widely Available cost estimation applications can be used for faster estimation of alternatives.  At a minimum capabilities should include the ability to house, store, and recall a construction cost database, provide a collaborative environment, create, report, and export (excel, PDF), detailed line item cost estimates, track source of line time, and have ability to include notes at line item level.

Vendor Bid Analysis / Contractor/Subcontractor Quote Analysis: A method used to benchmark costs. If a project is won in a competitive bid, more details should be considered for cost estimation and control purposes.

Contingency or Reserve Analysis – Allowances used to deal with uncertainty or “knowns-unknowns” and these are added to the cost estimates, thus sometimes overstating construction project costs. Options vary between grouping similar activities and assigning a single contingency reserve for that group to a zero duration activity.

Cost of Quality – Cost of quality can also be used to prepare the schedule activity cost estimate.

Cost Budgeting – Aggregating the estimated costs of individual schedule activities or work package to establish a total cost baseline for measuring project performance. The project scope of work statements are prepared prior to the summary budget. Schedule activity or work package cost estimates are prepared prior to the detailed budget requests and work authorization.  
 
 

Cost Aggregation – Schedule activity cost estimates are aggregated and grouped by work packages, which may be then grouped by higher levels as per levels set by the WBS, then finally by the entire project.

Parametric Estimating – Using construction project characteristics (parameters) in a mathematical model to predict total project costs. Both the cost and accuracy of parametric models vary widely. They are most likely to be reliable when: the historical information used to develop the model is accurate, the parameters used in the model are readily quantifiable, and the model is scalable (it works within the range of likely construction sizes to be finalized).

Funding Limit / Budget Reconciliation – Funds are reconciled and based on the results and new limits are set and WBS components are adjusted. This may impact allocation of resources to the project. If costs are used in the schedule development process, the process is repeated with new constraints and a new baseline is derived.

 

Primary Causes of Cost Variation

 
Cost control and/or the level of confidence associated with a construction cost estimate can be affected by several factors… 1. Level of collaboration and detail with which the scope of work is discussed and shared among all stakeholders, 2. The construction deliver method, 3. The experience level and competency of the team, 4. The amount experience that the team has had working together in the past, 4. Degree and/or number of uncertainties, 5. The method in which the project is managed (assuring that requested changes are detailed and agreed upon, managing the actual changes when and as they occur, ongoing (daily) monitoring project work and cost performance to detect and understand variance from the cost baseline, recording all appropriate changes accurately against the cost baseline versus the project cost estimate, adhering to established processes and workflow s (preventing incorrect, inappropriate, or unapproved changes from being included in the reported cost or resource usage, informing appropriate stakeholders of proposed, approved changes, leveraging the use of key performance indicators (KPIs), shared risk/reward among all participants.
Tools and Techniques of Construction Estimating and Associate Cost Control

Project / Program / Contract Execution Plan and//or Operations Manual – In addition to the Construction Delivery Method, likely the most important item relevant to improving outcomes. A written, detailed, and agreed upon document defining roles, responsibilities, documents, costs data types/formats, specifications. Outcomes, deliverables, processes, workflows, approvals/approval levels, etc., tools associated with the cost management plan.

Collaborative Construction Cost Estimating and Project Tracking System – Cloud based system that enables transparent creation, modification, use, updating, and storage.  Inclusive of construction cost line item database.

Key Performance Indicators, KPIs, Performance Measurement Analysis – Performance measurement methods, metrics, techniques to help to assess the magnitude of any variance that will invariably occur with any construction estimate, or construction project/program.   For example, the earned value technique (EVT) compares the cumulative value of the budgets cost of work scheduled (planned) to the actual cost control, resource management, and production. An important part of cost control is to determine the variance, the magnitude of the variance, and to decide if the variance requires corrective action. The earned value technique uses the cost control contained in the project management plan to assess project progress and the magnitude of any variations that occur. The earned value technique involves developing these key values for each schedule activity, work package, or control account.

Planned value (PV) – PV is the budgeted cost for the work scheduled to be completed on an activity or WBS component up to a given point in time.

Earned value (EV) – EV is the budgeted amount for the work actually completed on the schedule activity or WBS component during a given time period.

Actual cost (AC) – AC is the actual cost incurred in accomplishing work on the schedule activity or WBS component during a given time period. This AC must correspond in definition and coverage to whatever was budgeted for the PV and the EV (e.g. direct hours only, direct cost only, or all costs including indirect costs).

Estimate to complete (ETC) and estimate at completion (EAC) – The PV, EV, and AC values are used in combination to provide performance measures of whether or not work is being accomplished as planned at any given point in time. The most commonly used measures are cost variance (CV) and schedule variance (SV). The amount of variance of the CV and SV values tend to decrease as the project reaches completion due to compensating effect of more work being accomplished. Predetermined acceptable completion can be established in the cost management plan.

Cost Variance (CV) – CV equals earned value (EV) minus actual cost (AC). The cost variance at the end of the project will be the difference between the budget at the completion (BAC) and the actual amount spent. Formula: CV=EV-AC

Schedule Variance (SV) – SV equals earned value (EV) minus planned value (PV). Schedule variance will ultimately equal zero when the project is completed because all of the planned values will ultimately equal zero when the project is completed because all of the planned values will have been earned. Formula: SV=EV-PV   The values CV and SV, can be converted to efficiency indicators (KPIs) to reflect the cost and schedule performance of any project.

Cost performance index (CPI) – A CPI value less than 1.0 indicate accost overrun of the estimates. A CPI value greater than 1 indicates a cost under-run of the estimates. CPI equals the ratio of the EV to the AC. The CPI is the most commonly used cost-efficiency indicator. Formula: CPI=EV/AC

Cumulative CPI (CPI^c) – The cumulative CPI is widely used to forecast project costs at completion. CPIC equals the sum of the periodic earned values (EV^c) divided by the sum of the individual actual costs (AC^c). Formula: SPI=EV/PV   The earned value technique in its various forms is a commonly used method of performance measurement. It integrates project scope, cost (or resource) and schedule measures to help the project team assess project performance.

 

Forecasting –  Making estimates or predictions of conditions in the project’s future based on the information and knowledgeable available at the time of the forecast. As the project progresses, the forecasts are adjusted.  The earned value technique parameters of BAC, actual cost (AC^c) to date, and the cumulative CPI^c efficiency indicator are used to calculate ETC and EA, where the BAC is equal to the total PV at completion for a schedule activity, work package, control account, or other WBS component.  Forecasting technique parameters to assess the cost or the amount of work to complete schedule activities is called the EAC. Forecasting techniques also help to determine the ETC, which is the estimate for completing the remaining work for a schedule activity, work package, or control account. While the earned value technique of determining EAC and ETC is quick and automatic, it is not as valuable or accurate as a manual forecasting technique based upon the performing organization providing the estimate to complete.  ETC is based on the new estimate. ETC equals the revised estimate for the work remaining as determined by the performing organization. This more accurate and comprehensive completion for all the work remaining considers the performance estimate to complete all the work remaining and the performance or production of the resource to date.  Alternatively, to calculate ETC using value data, one of the two formulas is typically used: ETC based on atypical variances. This approach is most often used when current are seen as atypical and the project management team expectations are that similar variance will not occur in the future. ETC equals the BAC minus the cumulative earned value to date (EVC). Formula: ETC= (BAC – EVC)

ETC based on typical variances – This approach is most often used when current are seen as typical of future variances. ETC equals the BAC minus the cumulative EVC (the remaining PV) divided by the cumulative cost performance index (CPIC). EAC using a new estimate. EAC equals the actual costs to date (AC^c) plus a new ETC is provided by the performing organization. Formula: EAC=AC^c + ETC

 
 LEAN Collaborative Construction Practices Construction Cost Estimating

Learn more about…LEAN Collaborative Construction Practices Construction Cost Estimating

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
June 9, 2017Job Order Contracting Lessons Learned Regarding Improving Construction Productivity

Job Order Contracting Lessons Learned Regarding Improving Construction Productivity

Here are a few lessons learned with respect to improving construction productivity, and overall life-cycle management of the built environment.  Job Order Contracting Lessons Learned Regarding Improving Construction Productivity …

Job Order Contracting Lessons Learned Regarding Improving Construction Productivity

  1. First and foremost, the primary issue impacting low productivity and poor life-cycle management of built environment is the need for higher levels of leadership and  ownership on the part of real property Owners.
  2. Secondly, robust LEAN collaborative project delivery methods have proven capable of delivering approximate 90% of renovation, repair, and new construction projects on-time, on-budget, and to the satisfaction of all participants.   Thus, a road map to improving the woefully low productivity associated with the AECOO sector is there for everyone’s use. (Note: examples of LEAN Construction Delivery Methods include Integrated Project Delivery, IPD for major new construction, and Job Order Contracting, JOC for renovation, repair, and minor new construction.)
  3. Data is certainly important, especially actionable detailed transparent and objective sourced information, shared among all participants (FM, contractor, AEs, building users…)  at early stages and throughout end-of-life.   That said, data is meaningless if not interpreted and applied properly.
  4. As to technology, it is NOT THE SOLUTION, it is simply an enabler with respect to rapid, more consistent, and lower cost deployment of robust LEAN processes.
  5. Continuous education, improvement, and collaboration drive better outcomes.

Focus must be upon building strong leadership, competency, and collaboration internal to an organization and doing the same with external service providers.


WHAT NOT TO DO….

JOC is a collaborative construction delivery method.  It is NOT solely a procurement method.  Is also should NOT be used to bypass traditional procurement methods to simply save time or approve project that otherwise would not have been approved.   Unfortunately some sectors such as County, State, and Local Government are notoriously poor facilities management practitioners and many agencies have corrupted the use of JOC.   This fact readily demonstrated if one take the time to review the many publicly available independent and internal audits of JOC Programs in this sector.

Conversely the Federal Government and Higher Education, for the most part, deploy JOC properly and have reaped the available benefits.


RULES TO LIVE BY…

Deploying JOC, and any collaborative LEAN construction delivery method properly, does indeed solve many AECOO industry if used properly.  All, however  REQUIRE the following…

Job Order Contracting Lessons Learned Regarding Improving Construction Productivity

  • Focus upon Outcomes
  • Best Value Procurement
  • Collaboration
  • Common Data / Information Environment (examples- Uniformat, Masterformat, Omniclass), Work Breakdown Structure, Common Line Item Cost Data
  • Financial Transparency – Detailed Line Item Tasks, including Full Descriptions in Common Terms/Plain English and Labor, Materials, and Equipment Breakdowns
  • Shared Risk/Reward
  • Operation/Execution Manuals as part of the Contract
  • Multi-party Agreements
  • Defined Roles, Responsibilities, Deliverable, and Outcomes
  • Continuous Improvement
  • Ongoing Annual Training/Certification
  • Monitoring / Audits
  • Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
  • Supporting Technology
  • Checklists, Audits, Status Reports, Plans, Forms/Documents – Budget, Resource, Communications, Training, Cost Estimating, Project Delivery, Project Management, Progress versus Goals, Procurement/Payments, Implementation/Deployment, Milestones, Change Requests, Project Closeout…
  • Early and Ongoing Communication Among ALL Participants from Concept through Warranty
  • Detailed, Mutually Established Statement of Work / Project Scope
  • Compliance with Contract, Rules, Regulations, Statutes
  • Quality Control/Quality Assurance Plans
  • Negotiation-centered Dispute Resolution
  • Current, Actionable Information
  • Oversight and Leadership without Excessive Management and Control

Learn more…

Peter Cholakis, 4bt.us

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
June 8, 2017June 8, 2017BIM for FM

BIM for FM

BIM for FM

BIM for Facilities Management – 12 Reasons

Peter Cholakis Senior Vice President at Four BT, LLC, Moscardi, Lemsys SRL

 

12 Good Reasons to Adopt BIM for Facilities Management

Despite the fact that the use of the BIM[1] methodology in Facilities Management is becoming ever more important for all organizations for both economic and environmental reasons, BIM software adoption for facilities operation and maintenance (O&M) remains poor.

Distribution and sharing of information by the Facilities Management Team is crucial to achieving cost efficient and high performing facilities, however, 3-D BIM visualization and modeling software is generally very sophisticated, relatively expensive, and very complex.   Current 3-D BIM software targets sophisticated users who focus upon design yet are ill-suited to support or engage in Facilities Management functions.

Complex 3-D visualization type of software is SIMPLY NOT REQUIRED to practice efficient life-cycle management of the built environment.  What is required is an integrated, customer focused service delivery approach based upon LEAN collaborative construction design and delivery methods, a common data environment that transparently shares detailed technical and locally researched actionable and standardized cost information, and the integration of multiple cloud-based technologies to effectively manage each core domain and competencies of facility life-cycle management.

Twelve (12) reasons for facilities managers to adopt change management and relevant technologies in support of BIM strategy and implementation:

1.      LEAN Construction Delivery, the foundation of the efficient management of the built environment, have a proven track record. Examples such as integrated project delivery and job order contracting (JOC) deliver over 90% of renovation, repair, and new construction project on-time, on-budget, and to the satisfaction of all participants and stakeholders.[2]

2.      There are no barriers to integrating various BIM technologies and LEAN processes, except that of the need for Owners to provide leadership, and for all organization to successfully drive change management.

3.      3-D visualization is already rooted in design and construction phases and is therefore inevitable that it is also adopted in the subsequent operation and maintenance phase, and integrated with other competencies and tools (however, again, is not a requirement).

4.      LEAN construction delivery, common data environments, and open cloud-based technologies enable measurable gains in efficiency, cost-effectiveness, collaboration, and transparency.

5.      Collaborative LEAN construction delivery and supporting BIM methods and technologies will become the standardized method for Facilities Management, regardless of the size of an organization.

6.      The focus of BIM upon life-cycle costs versus first drives continuous improvement and provides major environmental benefits, such a lowering carbon footprints.

7.      BIM’s collaborative LEAN construction process are beneficial for all types of projects – public and private sector and all types of properties – hospitals, commercial buildings, residential buildings, etc.

8.      Cost of implementation is insignificant versus cost savings.

9.      The expertise and involvement of Facilities Managers during the initial concept development and design through deconstruction is crucial to ensuring life-cycle performance of the building/physical asset.

10.  Current inventory and location, condition, and detailed service plans and costs of building components and technology assets are uniquely stored, traceable, and readily accessed.

11.  Information and asset inventory can be viewed in a wide variety of ways depending upon user needs: displaying all the premises using pictures, 3D models, 2D CAD, detailed line items in list view, etc.

12.  Operation and Maintenance are now part of an overall integrated service delivery approach.

Solutions such as Building in Cloud, allow, via access through any device (desktop, tablet, or smartphone and a Web browser) access to a full range of facilities management information and associated proven LEAN collaborative workflows/processes.

Have you some cases of successful implementation of BIM in the Facility management processes to highlight and you would like to bring to the attention of those working in the industry?

If yes please comment on this post, or email me, and we will share your experience with others! info@4BT.US

[1] BIM is defined as the efficient life-cycle management of the built environment supported by digital technologies.

[2] For JOC, due to the need for negotiations on individual delivery orders and the lack of a defined scope of work at the beginning of the contract, teamwork and frequent communication are required for a successful contract. . A formal =partnering process is required in JOC to focus the parties in that direction. In addition, many JOC contracts employ a negotiated source selection based upon best value procurement.

Learn more…

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
June 7, 2017Uncategorized

Improve Construction Productivity

Improve Construction Productivity using Integrated Project Delivery, Job Order Contracting (JOC) and other proven LEAN construction methods.

Research has clearly determined as well as decades of successful deployment have determine that integrated service delivery methods, such as JOC and IPD, improve overall project delivery effectiveness.

Improve Construction Productivity

 

Survey information obtained from both real property owners and construction contractors spans construction performance, administrative support, owner-contractor relationships, and overall satisfaction.

Analysis of available survey data and discussion with experience professionals in these areas reveal that owners, contractors, and oversight groups perceived advantages in the use of properly designed and executed Job Order Contracting and Integrated Project Delivery programs.

Learn more…

Below are examples of best practices to be considered when structuring and executing a JOB ORDER CONTRACTING PROGRAM.
  • Promote awareness and education of  LEAN and BEST VALUE construction delivery methods among management and projectall project participants – Owners (procurement/contracting, engineering/management) Contractors, Engineers, Architects, and Oversight Groups.
  • Focus upon BEST VALUE and fully leveraging and enabling the expertise of all  project participants from initial concept and throughout the entire life-cycle of the built structure.
  • Enhance the understanding and appreciation of collaboration, transparency, common terms/definitions/data formats, shared risk/reward, best business practices, metrics, and continuous improvement.
  • A common and minimum body of knowledge must be defined as a performance standard.
  • Reward achievement through an appropriate recognition –  example – additional work for contractor.
  • Provide work flows, data formats, and technologies which enable experiences with the principles and techniques of state of work definition, cost estimating, project management, and performance analysis to be reported, discussed, documented, and reused.
  • Foster and promote ongoing training.
  • Incorporate systems to maintain standards of proficiency and performance – monitoring / metrics.
  • Require cooperation among internal and external project participants with common or related purposes, in furtherance of project success.
  • Provide opportunities for participants to collectively discuss and comment on subjects of common interest.
  • Establishing standards in the terminology, conduct and application of all procedures and policies
  • Leverage technology that embeds LEAN workflows
  • Share risk and reward among participants.

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
June 7, 2017Job Order Contracting Information

Job Order Contracting Information

Job order contracting information is key to improving construction productivity. Public works contracts vary from private sector contracts in that legislation sets the contracting guidelines for contracts and the public interest demands safeguarding process integrity.

Job Order Contracting Information

Thus, the requirement for full and open competition is a hallmark of
public contracts.

To minimize the chance of favoritism or corruption, the sealed bid
contracting method was developed to award a contract on the basis of price alone.   Also referred to as the “Design-Bid-Build” process, this system has long been the most prevalent option for large and small public works contracts.

Over time, however, design-bid-build has proven to be inefficient, antagonistic, and incapable of delivering the majority of construction project on-time, on-budget, and to everyone’s satisfaction.

Learn more….

Related Resources:

ASSET LIFE-CYCLE MODEL – Total Cost of Ownership Management – A framework for facilities life-cycle  management.

Building Information Modelling BIM in the Construction Industry – Technical Report TR-1405

BIM, LEAN Construction, and a Common Data Environment (CDE) – A  strategic tool for sharing information and managing a team within a BIM / LEAN Construction Delivery environment.

BIM, PROJECT DELIVERY METHODS, WASTE, & LACK OF LEADERSHIP – Traditional design-bid- build (DBB) contracting techniques, and even more recent attempts to improve DBB such as design-build (DB), CM@R, etc. should not be considered LEAN efficient construction delivery methods.

COAA – Owners Perspective – BIM for FIM, BIFM – BIM for FM and a “Building Information Management Framework” – BIMF includes a laser sharp focus on integrated functional planning and cost metrics. The framework’s value for stakeholders includes: a) transformational change effected by a capital planning philosophy that emphasizes integration of professional practice; b) delivery models that emphasize lean construction practices; and, c) transparent standardized construction and facility operations data and taxonomies that contain cost by providing access to building information whether stored or linked to a building
model.

How to Select a JOC Unit Price Book – White Paper – Download – Select a JOC UPB – A JOC  Unit Price Book, UPB is very important to the  quality, integrity, productivity,  and transparency of any Job Order  Contract.

JOB ORDER CONTRACTING – Overview & Best Management Practices – Job Order Contracting White Paper 2016801 – Job Order Contracting (JOC) is a competitively bid, firm-fixed price, Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) LEAN construction delivery method.

COLLABORATION IN CONSTRUCTION – IPD, JOC – Collaboration In Construction-White Paper – Owners determine the  approach  for funding, using, sustaining and disposing of buildings and infrastructure. They also select the construction delivery method.

Construction Cost Workbook – 2002 – Conference on the International Comparison Program World Bank

INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY – for Public and Private Owners – Integrated_Project_Delivery_for_Owners_ – A Joint Effort of the National Association of State Facilities Administrators (NASFA);Construction Owners Association of America (COAA);APPA: The Association of Higher Education Facilities Officers;Associated General Contractors of America (AGC); and American Institute of Architects (AIA)

THE HISTORY OF JOB ORDER CONTRACTING – The LEAN Construction Delivery Method – The United States Department of the Army is attributedwith initially developing and deploying Job Order Contracting during the early 1980s.

Job Order Contracting – A Procurement Success Story, 1998 – Moore, W., Stout, C.

LEAN Construction Detailed Overview – LEAN Construction Institute, LCI – An overview of LEAN Construction

Unit Price Books for Job Order Contracting – A quick tutorial about Unit Price Books, UPB (s), for Job Order Contracting, and what you need to know.

Why BIM Will Not Succeed – Higher Level of Owner Competency Required – BIM requires a higher  level of  interdependence and information sharing in order to fully understand needs, requirements, limitations, desired outcomes, and overall best value.

The What, Why and How of Job Order Contracting (JOC) – CEFPI Educational Brief – JOC a unique cost competitive delivery process for minor construction, renovations, repairs, and alterations that is faster and better than the traditional “design-bid-build” method.

2015-IDIQ-Contract-White-Paper-National-Academy-of-Sciences – Systematic, well-designed research provides the most effective approach to the solution of many problems facing highway  administrators and engineers.

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PARTNERING AND SOURCE SELECTION IN JOB ORDER CONTRACTING – Design-bid-build has proven to be inefficient, antagonistic, and incapable of delivering the majority of construction project on-time, on-budget, and to everyone’s satisfaction.

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
June 5, 2017CMMS Facilities Operations Maintenance Best Management Practices

CMMS Facilities Operations Maintenance Best Management Practices

CMMS Facilities Operations Maintenance Best Management Practices span a broad range of services, competencies, processes, and tools required to assure the built environment will perform the functions for which designed, constructed, and currently used:   All activities associated with the routine, day to day use, support and maintenance of a building or physical asset; inclusive of administration, management fees, normal/routine maintenance, custodial services and cleaning, fire protection services, pest control, snow removal, grounds care, landscaping, environmental
operations and record keeping, trash-recycle removal, security services, service contracts, utility charges (electric, gas/oil, water), insurance (fire, liability, operating equipment) and taxes. It does not include capital improvements. This category may include expenditures for service contracts and other third-party costs. Operational activities may involve some routine maintenance and minor repair work that are incidental to
operations but they do not include any significant amount of maintenance or repair work that would be included as a separate budget item.

CMMS Facilities Operations Maintenance Best Management Practices

CMMS Facilities Operations Maintenance Best Management Practices  include the day-to-day activities necessary for the building/built structure (examples:  facilities, roadways, bridges, dams, airports, mass transits,  utilities, landscaping, snow removal, etc.) and its systems, equipment, and occupants/users to perform their intended function.

Facilities operations and maintenance encompass a broad spectrum of services, competencies, processes, and tools required to assure the built environment will perform the functions for which designed and constructed. Operations and maintenance are combined into the common term Built structures cannot operate at peak efficiency without being properly maintained.

The following are generally required to implement CMMS Facilities Operations Maintenance Best Management Practices:

  • Standardized and common glossary of terms, definitions, and data architectures (examples of data architectures include: Uniformat, Masterformat, Omniclass, Cobie, etc.) that support a common data environment (CDE)
  • Open and locally researched unit price line time cost data describing tasks.
  • Introductory and ongoing education and training
  • Collaborative Construction and Service Delivery Methods (example – Job Order Contracting)
  • Technology with embedded processes/workflows/and a common data environment (CDE)

Operations and maintenance (O&M) activities can further be divided several functions/areas:

Emergency Maintenance: Unscheduled work that requires immediate action to restore services, to remove problems that could interrupt
activities, or to protect life and property.

General Maintenance:  Custodial, trash removal, landscaping, snowplowing, janitorial activities.

Planned or Programmed Maintenance: 
Includes those maintenance tasks whose cycle exceeds one year. Examples of planned or programmed
maintenance are painting, flood coating of roofs, overlays and seal coating of roads and parking lots, pigging of
constricted utility lines and similar functions.

Predictive Maintenance: Predictive Maintenance/Testing/Inspection Routine maintenance, testing, or inspection performed to anticipate failure using specific methods and equipment, such as vibration analysis, thermographs, x-ray or acoustic systems to aid in determining future
maintenance needs. For example, tests to locate thinning piping, fractures or excessive vibration that are
indicative of maintenance requirements.

Preventive Maintenance: A planned, controlled program of periodic inspection, adjustment, cleaning, lubrication and/or selective parts
replacement of components, and minor repair, as well as performance testing and analysis intended to
maximize the reliability, performance, and lifecycle of building systems, equipment, etc. Preventive
maintenance consists of many check point activities on items, that if disabled, may interfere with an essential
installation operation, endanger life or property, or involve high cost or long lead time for replacement.

Repair(s):  Work that is performed to return equipment to service after a failure, or to make its operation more efficient.
The restoration of a facility or component thereof to such condition that it may be effectively utilized for its
designated purposes by overhaul, reprocessing, or replacement of constituent parts or materials that have
deteriorated by action of the elements or usage and have not been corrected through maintenance.

Routine Maintenance:  Normal/Routine Maintenance and Minor Repairs
Cyclical, planned work activities funded through the annual budget cycle, done to continue or achieve either
the originally anticipated life of a fixed asset (i.e., buildings and fixed equipment), or an established suitable
level of performance. Normal/routine maintenance is performed on capital assets such as buildings and fixed
equipment to help them reach their originally anticipated life. Deficiency items are low in cost to correct and
are normally accomplished as part of the annual operation and maintenance (O&M) funds. Normal/routine
maintenance excludes activities that expand the capacity of an asset, or otherwise upgrade the asset to serve
needs greater than, or different from those originally intended.

Unscheduled/Unplanned Maintenance: Reactive and non-emergency corrective work activities that occur in the current budget cycle or annual program. Activities may range from unplanned maintenance of a nuisance nature requiring low levels of skill
for correction, to non-emergency tasks involving a moderate to major repair or correction requiring skilled
labor.   Requests for system or equipment repairs that – unlike preventive maintenance work – are unscheduled and unanticipated. Service calls generally are received when a system or component has failed and/or perceived to be working improperly. If the problem has created a hazard or involves an essential service, an emergency response may be necessary. Conversely, if the problem is not critical, a routine response is adequate.
Reactive and/or emergency corrective work activities that occur in the current budget cycle or annual program.
Activities may range from unplanned maintenance of a nuisance nature requiring low levels of skill for
correction, to non-emergency tasks involving a moderate to major repair or correction requiring skilled labor, to
emergency unscheduled work that requires immediate action to restore services, to remove problems that
could interrupt activities, or to protect life and property.

Key Performance Indicators – KPIs  for monitoring CMMS Facilities Operations Maintenance Best Management Practices
􀀹 Facility Operating Gross Square Foot (GSF) Index (SAM Performance Indicator: APPA 2003)
􀀹 Custodial Costs per square foot
􀀹 Grounds Keeping Costs per square foot
􀀹 Energy Costs per square foot
􀀹 Energy Usage
􀀹 Utility Costs per square foot
􀀹 Waste Removal Costs per square foot
􀀹 Facility Operating Current Replacement Value (CRV) Index (SAM Performance Indicator: APPA 2003) 
􀀹 Emergency Maintenance Costs as a percentage of Annual Operations Expenditures.
􀀹 Unscheduled/Unplanned Maintenance Costs as a percentage of Annual Operations Expenditures.

􀀹 Repair costs (man hours and materials) as a percentage of Annual Operations Expenditures

CMMS Facilities Operations Maintenance Best Management Practices

via Four BT, LLC – Independent, Objective, Best Value Lean Construction and Job Order Contracting Soutions

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
May 31, 2017Job Order Contracting Program Manager

Job Order Contracting Program Manager

Roles and responsibilities of a job order contracting program manager are both diverse and key to overall success.

Job Order Contracting Program Manager


Job Order Contracting Program Manager

Let’s take a look at the roles and responsibilities of a job order contracting program manager.  First, and foremost, the JOC Program Manager should be an employee of the real property owner and directly involved in both the strategic and day-to-day operations of the JOC Program.   Job Order Contracting is a multiple party, collaborative win-win agreement between a real property owner and the service provider(s), as such JOC Program management should not be outsourced to a third party, such as JOC consultant.

Based upon the type and location of the organization, the JOC Program Manager must assure that the JOC Program is in full compliance statues/regulations/laws pertaining to the acquisition and use of capital funds for a facility and/or physical infrastructure renovation, repair, maintenance, and/or minor new construction.


Qualifications, Roles and Responsibilities of a Job Order Contracting Program Manager – Sample Listing

  1. Knowledge of the construction management industry and life-cycle management of the built environment including but not limited to, contract and information management, quality control, cost control, and schedule control.
  2. Monitor, review, approves all forms and reports associated with the Job Order Contracting workflow.
  3. Represent the best interests of Real Property Owner is all matters relating to the JOC Program and associated JOC Projects, while doing so in  collaborative and transparent manner with all service providers and associated internal and external personnel/stakeholders.
  4. Participate in on-site inspections, budget/cost estimate development and/or reviews, monitor all stages/phases of the Job Order Contracting process/workflow.
  5. Review and assure that cost data, specifications, documents, tools and procedures are timely and appropriate.
  6. Participate in the review and close-out of all Job Order Contracting task orders / projects, and make recommendations on, and assist in any disputes claims/issues and close-out activities of the project.
  7. Review all JOC task order cost estimates, documents, packages for accuracy and compliance.
  8. Assure internal cost estimates are created when required and compared to JOC contractor estimates.
  9. Assure ongoing training for all JOC participants.
  10. Support JOC owner/JOC contractor negotiations between owner and contractors technical and procurement/purchasing teams.
  11. Monitor and report upon timeliness, quality, cost of all JOC projects.
  12. Make any necessary recommendations for alternative ways of accomplishing the JOC process / scope of work to achieve improved quality, cost reduction and schedule goals based upon establishments and review of key performance indicators (KPIs).
  13. Assure overall JOC Program compliance with respect to developing, preparing, publishing and evaluating request for proposals for JOC projects and all associated phases from initial conceptualization and acceptance/rejections through the warranty period.
  14. Assists owner and contractor JOC Project Managers as required, examples… preparing, organizing, maintaining, submitting, and tracking, summarizing and reporting all project documents and overall JOC Program operation.
  15. Assure full understanding of Job Order Contracting as a collaborative construction delivery method versus alternative delivery methods among all stakeholders-procurement, facilities management/DPW, contractors, building users, and oversight groups.

LEARN MORE>>>

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
May 26, 2017May 26, 2017Location Factors

Stop Using Construction Cost Indexes, Location Indexes, Location Factors

Whether you are involved in Job Order Contracting or engaging in general construction cost estimating its time to Stop Using Construction Cost Indexes,  Location Indexes, Location Factors.   The use of construction cost indexes, location indexes, or location factors is likely costing your organization money and creating major problems for everyone involved;  real property owners, contractors, subs, architects, engineers, and oversight groups.

Using location indexes appears to be a gamble, and the result will vary significantly depending on the index used. There is no obvious consistency between the publications, even those of the same type. This is very concerning as major decisions may be based upon this information.  – A Guide to Construction Cost Sources, Prism Economics and Analysis and the Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto

First, if one compares construction cost factors from various sources there appears to be no rhyme of reason for their development.   The variances can be extreme.   Secondly, applying a location factor to a unit price line time just doesn’t make sense.   The location of a job affects the labor rates, fringes, crew composition, and productivity… all of which can’t simply be multiplied by a factor.   As labor alone accounts for 60% of construction cost alone, the use of location factors can easily introduce gross errors. (Note: Some vendors even state the productivity is not considered in creating the location factor!)

Location indexes generally do not contain any assumptions or adjustments related the local labor productivity. It is important to note that the quantities are constant in every location. This means that some aspects of the construction process are not captured, such as labor skill levels or practices and local building code requirements.

Why are location factors used?

Simple.  Traditionally cost estimators have researched there own costs by calling subs and also by using national average price books.  Locally researched construction cost data either wasn’t available or was too expensive.

That is no longer the case, locally researched cost data is not only available, but it provides a faster, more efficient and reliable method of creating construction costs estimates for all parties.   Locally researched line item construction cost data can be even be relied upon to check estimates received from subcontractors/trades!!!

Stop Using Construction Cost Indexes, Location Indexes, Location Factors

Learn more about locally researched detailed line item construction cost data…

Stop Using Construction Cost Indexes,  Location Indexes, Location Factors

Validation
The reliability of the cost data is always in question. The method used to collect the cost data is very important to ensure the data are representative of the political and economic conditions. Data collection may be done by phone with associated firms (engineers, cost estimators, subcontractors/trades, contractors) providing information, by survey of published labor, material, and equipment costs, and/or by review of completed project files. Where associated firms are providing the information, it is important that they all understand the assumptions that must remain constant for all locations, and to not allow personal or local biases affect the reliability of the process.

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
May 25, 2017May 25, 2017Facilities Management Glossary

Facilities Management Glossary

Facilities Management Glossary

Facilities management glossary provided to improve collaboration and productivity for real property owners, contractors, architects, engineers & oversight groups .

Facilities Management Glossary


agreement: a fully executed (signed by appropriate parties) between the demand organization and the provider of services or products that clearly describes requirements in sufficient detail, including conditions, costs, resources required, desired outputs, and associated workflows.

asset: a physical item, thing or entity  that has potential or actual value to an organization

asset management: coordinated activity  of an organization monitor, control, and  realize value from physical items, things, or entities

built environment: buildings, land/landscaped areas, infrastructure  and other construction works

competence / competency – ability to apply knowledge, skills, and tools to achieve intended results in a  targeted area(s).  Examples specific to facility management include:  construction cost estimating, maintenance management, capital planning, space planning, project delivery, etc.

demand organization: an entity which has a need  and the authority to incur costs to have requirements  met

end user: person or organization  which uses products  or services obtained from a supplier

internal service provision, in-house service provision: delivery and management of by staff employed by the demand organization 

facility management, facilities management, FM: organizational function which integrates people, place, process,  technologies, competencies, with respect to  the  with the purpose of improving outcomes, including quality, productivity, satisfaction, and return on investment in support of the organizational mission.

facility process: process  which is integrated and managed by a facility management group/facility management organization

facility service: support provision to the primary activities  of an organization delivered by an internal or external provider

infrastructure system: of facilities, physical equipment, built structures, and services/products/processes  needed for the operation of an organization

open-book:  transparent exchange of relevant information (especially costs – (OpenCostTM) between the facility management/construction/AE service provider and the demand organization

organization: person or group of people that has its own functions with responsibilities, authorities and relationships to achieve its objectives  (examples: sole-proprietor, corporation, firm, enterprise, authority, partnership, charity or institution, or part or combination thereof, whether incorporated or not, public or private.

mobilization: phase to establish and implement all resources, tools, materials, information, information  and procedures prior to taking full responsibility for the facilities services to be delivered as specified in the agreement.

need/requirement:  a stated or implied expectation, specific (stated, for example in documented information or abstract, from the demand organization  which is essential to enable the achievement of the core purpose and key objectives, generally implied (custom or common practice for the organization and interested parties or obligatory

real estate / real property:  immovable land and/or buildings/physical structures.

service level: complete description of requirements  of a service, product, technology process or system with their defined characteristics

support service: non-primary activity  delivered in support of core business/core service of the organization

service level agreement, SLA: document which has been agreed between the demand organization  and a service / product provider  on defining performance, measurement  and conditions of product/service  delivery.

service provider organization: a provider that delivers one or more facility services that is internal or external to the demand organization .

specification(s): detailed description of the required performance  and/or technical requirements  for services  or products  and processes set out by the demand organization  to make clear to the service provider  the requirements to be fulfilled

workplace: physical location where work is performed

work station: location containing furniture and supporting equipment (telephony, IT and power connections), specifically designed or suitable for work-related activities and is suitable for permanent use


Facilities Management Glossary

 For a more definitive Construction Glossary, please visit…

For more information…

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
May 25, 2017May 25, 2017LEAN Construction Primer

LEAN Construction Primer

LEAN Construction Primer,  an introduction to collaborative construction delivery.

LEAN Construction delivers higher productivity and over 90% of construction projects on-time, on-budget, and to everyone’s satisfaction.

LEAN Construction Primer
LEAN Construction Primer

LEAN Construction Primer

So what is LEAN Construction?   Simple actually, it’s a process the embodies ALL of the following elements….

  1. Early and ongoing participation of all participants & stakeholders
  2. Common terms, definitions, and data architectures (i.e.  MasterFormat is an example of a data architecture)
  3. Financial transparency (i.e.  a shared line item unit price book, shared estimates, etc.)
  4. Shared risk/reward
  5. Continuous improvement
  6. Required ongoing training
  7. Key performance indicators
  8. Mutual respect/trust among all participants and stakeholders

The most notable examples of LEAN construction delivery methodology that have been deployed and proven include Integrated Project Delivery, IPD (for major new construction), and Job Order Contracting, JOC (for renovation, repair, and minor new construction).

LEAN Construction is tailored to each organization and its service providers, in consideration of the following…

Context of the Organization

  • External & Internal Issues
  • Interested Party Requirements
  • Scope of Work

Leadership

  • Real Property Owner Leadership & Commitment (Management is NOT outsourced)
  • Established life-cycle based Facilities Management Policy
  • Communication of FM Policy
  • Clear Definition of all Roles, Responsibilities, & Deliverables
  • Management Without Excessive Control

Planning

  • Risks & Opportunities
  •  Stakeholder Requirements
  • FM Objectives
  • Implementation Plan
  • Planning Horizons

Operations

  • Processes
  • Supporting cloud technology
  • Change Management/Control
  • Control Processes
  • Customer Relationships
  • Integrates Service Delivery
  • Global Oversight Supported by Local Knowledge and Action

Improvement

  • Nonconformity
  • Corrective Actions
  • Proactive Measures
  • Gap Analysis
  • Continually Improve

Support

  • Security
  • Source & Monitor
  • Assured Competencies
  • Awareness
  • Communications
  • Information Requirements

Performance Evaluation

  • Scope of Monitoring
  • Regular Independent Third-party Audits
  • Monitoring Means & Methods
  • Documented Results
  • Evaluate Performance – Key Performance Indicators
  • Top Management Review
  • Communicate/Act on Results

via Four BT, LLC, www.4bt.us … Independent, Objective, and Best Value LEAN Construction Delivery Solutions (JOC, IPD…), Training, Technology, Services, and Cost Data

LEAN Construction Primer

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
May 25, 2017May 25, 2017construction cost estimating software

Construction Cost Estimating Software

Construction Cost Estimating Software including 50,000 line item construction cost database and access via a secure cloud network, only $150.00/month!

The only cloud based construction cost estimating system available that is  independent and objective, includes over 50,000 detailed construction line items created by cost estimators, project managers, and facilities managers with decades of industry experience, AND  also the a wide range of features noted below, and more!

Construction Cost Estimating Software 

Construction Cost Estimating Software

  • Secure – highest security rating available
  • Detailed line item cost data
  • Ability to create custom line items
  • Create favorites
  • Demolition line items
  • Line item modifiers (to account for quantity and other variables)
  • Licensed by Construction Specifiers Institute (CSI)
  • Organized by Masterformat
  • Create Estimates
  • Export to Excel, Adobe PDF
  • Easy to Use!   Virtually no training required, be up and running in minutes
  • So much more …..

10-day Trial to Qualified Organizations…

 

The 4BT Team helps Owners, Contractors, Subcontractors, Architectural&Engineering/Contract Management Companies and Cooperatives  develop best value cost estimating processes in support of their organization.
  • Education, Training, and Support for LEAN JOC  construction delivery methods.
  • Structured, Reliable, Best Value, Construction Cost Data & Unit Price Books.
  • Technology supporting low cost, consistent deployment and monitoring.

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
May 24, 2017May 24, 2017Job Order Contract Outsourcing

Job Order Contract Outsourcing

Job Order Contract outsourcing of core management is inconsistent with its inherent design and function.

outsource (verb) – to make an arrangement where an external organization/service provider/consultant   performs part of  demand organization’s function or process.   Note: The demand organization is an entity requesting services or products from an external service provider. The external organization is outside the scope of the management system of the demand organization.Job Order Contract Outsourcing

By definition Job Order Contracting is a LEAN construction delivery method that focuses upon early and ongoing communications between real property owners and construction contractor.  Competent and directly leadership, provided by the real property owner is important, IF NOT REQUIRED, in order to achieve the benefits of Job Order Contracting.

Learn more…

job order contract outsourcing

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
May 23, 2017May 23, 2017Uncategorized

Job Order Contract Open Standards

Job Order Contract Open Standards increase collaboration and productivity for owners and contractors as well as improve financial visibility.

Job Order Contract Open Standards

OpenJOC provides facilities management a means to consistently execute renovation, repair, and minor new construction on-time, on-budget, and per established requirements.

OpenJOC improves financial visibility

OpenJOC helps to assure compliance 

OpenJOC established a collaborative, win-win relationship between owner and contractor teams

OpenJOC can be monitored globally yet managed locally

OpenJOC embodies change management

OpenJOC provide a wealth of current and actionable facilities information, including detailed unit price line items.

OpenJOC is supported by cloud  technology

OpenJOC can be tailor to organization and local requirements

OpenJOC delivers competitive advantage through improved performance

OpenJOC delivers best value through proven process implementation

OpenJOC minimizes disruption through effective risk management

OpenJOC uses common terms and a common cost data environment (CCDE) 

OpenJOC clearly defines service level requirements and customer expectations

OpenJOC monitors key  performance indicators

Learn more…

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
May 23, 2017LEAN Construction Job Order Contracting Standards

LEAN Construction Job Order Contracting Standards

LEAN Construction Job Order Contracting Standards provide requirements, workflows, specifications, guidelines or characteristics that can be used consistently to ensure that renovation, repair, minor new construction projects and their associate materials, products, processes and services are fit for their purpose, and delivered on-time and on-budget, to everyone’s satisfaction.

LEAN Construction Job Order Contracting Standards

Contact us today to get your 80+page template…. (available to qualifying organizations only).

LEAN Construction Job Order Contracting Standards provide requirements, workflows, specifications, guidelines, and characteristics to improve outcomes for all.

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
May 22, 2017Good JOC Program

Good JOC Program

What is a Good JOC Program ?

A Good JOC Program is …
✓ proactive,
✓ a team effort,
✓ based on mutual trust/respect and shared risk/reward,
✓ money well spent,
✓ an effective method of reducing the life-cycle cost of a building and/or built structure,
✓ in the best interest of taxpayers,
✓ complementary to organization objectives, &
✓ financially transparent.

Good JOC Program

 

Request a copy of an 80+ page Job Order Contract Operations Manual Template

via www.4BT.US – Independent, Objective, Best Value LEAN Job Order Contracting Solutions for Savvy Owners & Contractors.

More About Us…

Our JOC Team helps Owners, Contractors, Subcontractors, Architectural&Engineering/Contract Management Companies and Cooperatives  develop, deploy, and execute LEAN best practice Job Order Contracts.
  • Education, Training, and Support for LEAN JOC  construction delivery methods.
  • Structured, Reliable, Best Value, Construction Cost Data & Unit Price Books.
  • Technology supporting low cost, consistent deployment and monitoring.

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
May 22, 2017May 22, 2017Six Key Features of Job Order Contract, Six Key Job Order Contract Features Assure Success

Six Key Job Order Contract Features Assure Success

Six Key Job Order Contract Features Assure Success for real property owners, contractors, and oversight groups.

Six Key Job Order Contract Features Assure Success

  1. Monitoring:   This includes initial joint site visits, regular site inspections, the use of key performance indicators and JOC specific software, as well as independent JOC Program audits.
  2. Record-Keeping:  A cloud based record-keeping system is essential for assuring collaboration, providing real time access to current and actionable information, and determining trends and patterns
  3. Locally researched construction cost data (versus national average cost data and location factors), based upon open standards and collaborative development/maintenance.
  4. Clearly defined roles, responsibilities, and workflows as defined by a written JOC Operation Manual / JOC Execution Guide.   Six Key Job Order Contract Features Assure Success
  5. Required and ongoing training:  Introductory and Advanced provided via regional, on-site, and virtual methods.
  6. Owner leadership, management, and support.

Request an 80-page JOC Operations Manual Template to receive information that goes well beyond Six Key Job Order Contract Features Assure Success …

 

Job Order Contracting can be a powerful tool in addressing physical infrastructure  maintenance management.   JOC can used across the facilities maintenance management spectrum.

Six Key Job Order Contract Features Assure Success
Leveraging JOC to move from reactive to proactive maintenance management results in fewer costly and highly disruptive emergency events, providing higher quality, greater customer satisfaction, and lowering overall costs.

via www.4BT.US – Independent, Objective, and Best Value LEAN Job Order Contracting Solutions for savvy owners and contractors.

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
May 19, 2017Community-based Construction Cost Estimating

Community-based Construction Cost Estimating

Community-based Construction Cost Estimating …  The OpenCostTM Approach

Take advantage of several critical improvements relative to the collection, validation, use, and maintenance of detailed line item unit price cost data to improve construction outcomes.

Traditional cost data commonly available on the market is based upon national averages.   Localization factors are used to attempt to provide a reasonable approximately of construction costs in particular areas.   While this approach is fine for gross approximation, locally researched cost data provides significantly improved financial visibility.

Community-based Construction Cost Estimating

The OpenCost MethodologyTM  is a collaborative and ongoing cost estimation process.  The estimator (owner/contractor/A&E, etc.) leverages an OpenCostTM locally researched and fully detailed line item cost database as a baseline.    Participant experience and a site visit with all service providers and stakeholders lead to a detailed construction cost estimate.  A collaborative and potentially iterative process then occurs between the owner and contractor(s) on a detailed line item basis.  The standardized terms and data formats contribute to the all parties’ ability to generate the final and mutually approved cost estimates that truly reflects the desired scope of work.

Once the estimate is mutually approved the construction team uses the estimate for the development of the schedule of values, the cost loaded schedule, and management of the construction progress and costs within the limits of the estimate, the associated construction delivery method, contract, and detailed written operations or execution manual.

The OpenCost ApproachTM leverages industry standard terms and definitions expressed in plain English with minimal use of confusing acronyms or abbreviations.  All data is organized by the Construction Specifications Institute MasterFormat.

The OpenCostTM Approach provides the following features, benefits, and core defensible elements:

  • Consistent and localized labor cost by trade
  • Crews reviewed and updated
  • Appropriate materials and line items
  • Line items are reviewed for clarity and reasonableness to ensure basic building materials usage to common area quantities
  • Line items reflect approximate quantities according to a trade break down
  • Use of licensed CSI MasterFormat
  • Ability to create customized line items via changes to material, labor, and equipment, while maintaining core “parent line items”.
  • Line item modifiers associated with parent line items to accommodate for variations in quantities, locations, etc.
  • Continuous updating process with annual major updates.
  • Addresses line items used in 90% or more of common renovation, repair, and minor new construction projects.
  • Independent, objective, transparent, and auditable cost research processes
  • Costs reflect standard commercial construction specifications for the location
  • Developed for ease-of-use for any experienced line item estimator with no additional training required
  • Available via secure cloud access
  • Developed by experienced line item cost engineers, project managers, and life-cycle cost professionals
  • Incorporates input from all users.
  • Significantly greater financial transparency
  • Subjective values associated with each estimator can be compared against locally researched verifiable information, not with ballpark national averages or factored data.
  • Major reductions in errors, omissions, change orders, and legal disputes.

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
May 18, 2017May 18, 2017JOB ORDER CONTRACTING Solutions

JOB ORDER CONTRACTING Solutions

JOB ORDER CONTRACTING Solutions

JOB ORDER CONTRACTING Solutions should be designed for Owners and Contractors to drive the best possible outcomes and assure compliance.   As such, they must be independent, objective, fully transparent and NOT linked to a JOC consultant if the later is being paid a percentage fee and managing the JOC Program.

Job Order Contracting, or a JOC Program is NOT simply a procurement method that public and/or other organizations use to complete renovation, repair, and minor new construction projects.  A JOC Program is a LEAN Collaborative Construction Delivery Method.

JOB ORDER CONTRACTING Solutions

As such, the JOC Program MUST be directly managed by the real property owner to achieve optimal results and NOT managed by third party.  Outsourcing a JOC program to a third party may be an excellent method (if the program is designed and managed properly),  for an Owner to learn JOC and/or for Owners with total annual JOC construction values under $2M, but otherwise, Owners should provide direct leadership and support.

JOB ORDER CONTRACTING Solutions

Independent, best value JOC Programs and associated JOB ORDER CONTRACTING Solutions are capable of delivering more than 90% of projects on-time, on-budget, and to the satisfaction of all participants.

Job order contracts are awarded to a contractor(s) based upon BEST VALUE.   Selection criteria generally include technical qualifications, past experience and or demonstrated ability to perform requisite tasks,  small business/WBE, MBE status, and the associated co-efficient(s) bid by the contractor.

Subcontractors may or may not be allowed based upon the contract document.

JOC Programs, contract documents should address and/or include the following:

  • Maximum and minimum construction values in dollars for year and any associated option years (generally up to a maximum of four (4) option years.
  • Maximum and minimum construction value for individual JOC projects/task orders.
  • Required annual training (introductory and advanced) for ALL participants (including training for the owner BEFORE the JOC Program is designed)
  • A unit price book, UPB, consisting of locally research construction cost data in the form of unit price line items of sufficient quantity to address a minimum of 90% (dollar value) of the total construction cost of each JOC project/task order.   Generally a UPB  of 30,000-60,000 line items is sufficient. (Note: an excessive number of line items can create confusion, cause errors, and delay proper program implementation).   Each line time should be include a description in plain English using common terms as well as labor, material, and equipment cost details as appropriate.   Separate demolition line items as well as line item modifiers should also be provided.   Modifiers apply to the parent line items and address applicable variable such as cost, access, construction methods.  All line items should be organized by CSI MasterFormat and updated annually. (Note: a “national average” price book, even if used with “localization factors” will not provide sufficient information for JOC Programs to assure the best possible outcomes for all parties.)
  • Written JOC Operations Manual / Execution Guide as part of the Job Order Contract.
  • All requisite forms.
  • Specialized JOC technical specifications are generally NOT REQUIRED unless construction means and methods do not follow commercial construction standards for the area/region.  The Owners current technical specifications should be referenced and required via the contract.  Should the Owner not have technical specification, sources such as Masterspec and BSD Speclink are generally more than sufficient and can be modified per owner requirements.
  • Key performance indicators and other metrics to monitor JOC Program success must be part of the contract.
  • JOC specific Cloud Cost Estimating Software that is capable of noting priced (UPB) and non-prepriced line items within each JOC project/task order and reporting same in detail.

 Process involved when using JOB ORDER CONTRACTING Solutions

Requests for projects are made but the customer/building user(s) per the pre-approved forms and generally via the electronic cloud JOC cost estimating/management software.    The owner technical and procurement team reviews and clarifies the request (JOC RFP).   The owner forwards the request to the approved JOC contractor(s) and schedules a site visit and scoping meeting among all participants in which they will discuss the requirements, goals and further define the scope of work.  The owner (technical and procurement team) reviews the detailed line item estimate and if the proposal is above a set threshold compare the estimate to the internal owner estimate / internal government estimate, IGE.   The owner and contractor enter in negotiations and/or discussions as needed and the owner approves the JOC project/task order, or cancels the request.   On average, there should be no more than one or two iterations when reviewing the taks order.  If there are more, there is likely something wrong with the JOC process and/or JOC tools.

If approved, the contractor sets up a JOC kick-off meeting mobilized for the project.   The owners should visit and review progress regularly (daily in most cases).  Once completed the owner does and inspection and signs off on the project and the contractor provide the requisite final JOC package as required, or the owner provides a punch list for the contractor to address any issues.

JOB ORDER CONTRACTING Solutions

Learn more…

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
May 17, 2017May 17, 2017Optimizing Construction Cost Estimating Outcomes

Optimizing Construction Cost Estimating Outcomes

Optimizing Construction Cost Estimating Outcomes requires experience, LEAN management practices, common data outcomes, metrics, and continuous improvement.

Optimizing Construction Cost Estimating Outcomes

The OpenCost Approach incorporates significant improvements into the collection, validation, use, & maintenance of detailed line item unit price Construction cost data.

Request our white paper to learn more about Optimizing Construction Cost Estimating Outcomes.

Below is a the Table of Contents for the 20-page document.

Contents

Introduction. 2

Detailed Construction Cost Data. 3

Traditional Construction Cost Methods. 4

Size of Typical Construction Cost Estimates & Unit Price Cost Books. 5

The OpenCostTM Approach. 6

Summary. 8

Appendix. 11

The Construction Estimating Conundrum.. 11

Line Item Estimating Details. 12

Choice of work Method. 12

Output of crew. 12

Cost of labor 13

Cost of Material 13

Addition for Overhead and Profit 14

Construction Estimator Skill Requirements for Detailed Unit Price Line Item Estimating. 14

Location. 16

Variability of Estimates. 16

Accurate Estimate – An Oxymoron. 17

Historical Data. 20

Optimizing Construction Cost Estimating Outcomes

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
May 16, 2017How Good is Your Job Order Contracting Program

How Good is Your Job Order Contracting Program?

How Good is Your Job Order Contracting Program?

Is it providing the benefits you anticipated…. saving money, providing on-demand quality services?

How Good is Your Job Order Contracting Program?

 


If you are a County, State, or Local Government and have a job program, the majority of independent and internal audits indicate you are NOT running your JOC Program optimally.


Characteristics of a Successful JOC Program:

  • Best value selection of construction contractors
  • Open, clearly documented roles, responsibilities, processes, and deliverables via written contracts AND the written JOC Operations/Execution Manual
  • Owner competence and demonstrated leadership skills
  • Shared risk/reward
  • Mutual trust & respect
  • Continuous improvement
  • Open, independent, and objective cost data
  • Required, continuous, introductory and advanced training
  • LEAN JOC business processes embedded within and supported by cloud-based technology
  • Owner review of all estimates
  • Independent or owner generated estimates for all projects over a pre-determined dollar volume
  • Continuous monitoring of quantitative key performance indicators (KPIs)
  • Regular independent third party compliance reviews & program audits

So, How Good is Your Job Order Contracting Program?

If you are interested in improving your JOC Program, please contact us….

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
May 15, 2017Uncategorized

4BT OpenJOC Job Order Contract Unit Price Book

4BT OpenJOCTM Unit Price Book (UPB)

The 4BT OpenJOC Job Order Contract Unit Price Book contains line item task descriptions and costs for commonly encountered renovation, repair, and minor new construction costs.

The number of and content of the line items within the 4BT OpenJOC Job Order Contract Unit Price Book are established to assure that 90% of the total dollar value of construction cost estimates for individual JOC projects/tasks is derived from UPB prepriced line items (items within the published and accepted UPB).  A 4BT OpenJOC Job Order Contract Unit Price Book of 40,000 to 60,000 unit price line items should be sufficient for most JOC Programs.

Core elements of the 4BT OpenJOC Job Order Contract Unit Price Book and the 4BT OpenCOSTTM Methodology:

  • All costs are researched locally to reflect appropriate market conditions.
  • Task descriptions are in plain English using industry standard terms.
  • Data organization uses CSI MasterFormat.
  • Line item modifiers are used to account for quantities, access, and other variables.
  • Demolition line items are easily located at the beginning of each section.
  • Community-based approach to cost research and updating.

 

Labor, material, and equipment details are provided within the 4BT OpenJOC Job Order Contract Unit Price Book for each line time as appropriate.

As noted in the below figure, line items are easily found by 1-keyword search, 2-MasterFormat Section Tree, or 3-scrolling.

4BT OpenJOC Job Order Contract Unit Price Book

 

JOC Contractor Selection:   Owners select and award JOC contracts via a best value procurement methodology which may include multiple selection criteria’s.     Once a Job Order Contract is advertised in accordance with local requirements, contractors should respond with an appropriate description of their capabilities, experience, past performance, and a JOC coefficient(s) (a coefficient may also be referred to as an “adjustment factor” or a “multiplier”).   There are generally three coefficients, one for standard work hours, one for non-standard work hours, and another for non-prepriced items, however, additional coefficients may be requested for “secure areas”, “remote areas”, etc. . .   An industry average JOC coefficient typically will range from 0.80 to 1.20.   The coefficient(s) is intended to account for the contractors overhead and profit, and any other items that are allowed per the Job Order Contract.   Awarded JOC contractor(s) use the coefficient(s) to determine lump sum costs for JOC task orders/projects.   The total cost of a JOC task order/project, as developed using the approved JOC UPB, is multiplied by the appropriate JOC coefficient to determine the total lump sum cost proposed by the contractor.

Learn more about the 4BT OpenJOC Job Order Contract Unit Price Book…

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
May 10, 2017May 15, 2017Locally Researched Construction Cost Data

Independent Objective Locally Researched Construction Cost Data

Independent Objective Locally Researched Construction Cost Data is critical to improving communication, productivity, and overall satisfaction.

Independent Objective Locally Researched Construction Cost Data

While the most popular source of construction cost data may be “national average” price books and associated localization factors, this approach simply doesn’t provide what owners and contractors need or what oversight groups should require!

In order for the AECOOO sector to take responsibility for the built make progress toward eliminating its legacy of environment, focus must be upon learning, collaboration, and actionable information.

Furthermore there must be contractual incentives for all participants involved to learn collectively and as individuals, and to be successful.

Best value LEAN construction delivery methods are proven to create an environment where over 90% of renovation, repair, and construction projects are delivered on-time, on-budget, and to the satisfaction of all participants and stakeholders.  Specific examples of these proven collaborative methods include Integrated Project Delivery, IPD, and Job Order Contracting, JOC.   The former is used for major new construction, while JOC is appropriate for renovation, repair, and minor new construction.

Both IPD and JOC require a common data environment, CDE, to drive communication, provide financial transparency, and to mitigate the number of errors and omissions and changes orders that are prevalent with traditional construction delivery (design-bid-build, lowest bidder, design-build…).

A CDE included a common set of terms, definitions, and standardized data architectures.  Terms should not be overly complex, stated in plain English, and limit the use of confusing acronyms.   CSI Masterformat, Uniformat, and Omniclass are examples of standard data architectures, which play an extremely important role in aiding communication, improving productivity, and lower the cost of information gathering and maintenance.
Detailed line item cost data, organized by CSI Masterformat, is the foundation of any project and all associated construction cost management activities.  The source of this information typically varies, yet commonly includes a combination of in-house experience, subcontractor information, and purchased third party cost data.

Independent Objective Locally Researched Construction Cost Data

Common Characteristics Associated with Actionable Construction Cost Data 
  1. Locally researched cost data (not a national average cost data and/or localization factors)
  2. Common set of terms and definitions in plain English
  3. Full description of labor, materials, and equipment, including crew composition where appropriate
  4. Organized by CSI Masterformat
  5. Demolition line items
  6. Modifier line items (items that account for variables that may impact the cost of the associate “parent” line item, such as quantity, work height/access, etc.)
  7. Independent and objective sourcing and updating
  8. Ongoing updating process
  9. Created by professional with decades of actual construction field experience, NOT cost researchers.
  10. Sufficient quantity/database size to account for at least 90% of construction projects typically encountered.

Independent, Objective, Locally Researched Construction Cost Data

Independent Objective Locally Researched Construction Cost Data

IIndependent Objective Locally Researched Construction Cost Data

Independent Objective Locally Researched Construction Cost Data

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
May 9, 2017May 11, 2017Uncategorized

Estimating Construction Costs for Job Order Contracts

Estimating Construction Costs for Job Order Contracts properly is critical to the success of any JOC program.

As a real proper owner, facilities management professional, or construction contractor, is important to review internal policies, procedures and controls with respect to your JOC Program and Estimating Construction Costs for Job Order Contracts:

  • Are there areas of risk and/or compliance issues?
  • Are management controls sufficient and effective?
  • Is the JOC Program delivering expected benefits?
  • Is the unit price book being used truly independent, objective, and transparent?
  • As an owner are you truly managing the process or relying heavily upon a JOC consultant?
  • Is your JOC Program free of the risk of fraud and/or improper relationships?

Reduction in the procurement lead-time and construction cost for work orders is a benefit promised by some JOC Consultants and/or service providers.  That said, several independent and/or internal audits have found that the cost savings has not occurred.   This failure, however, is not due the fundamental aspects of JOC, but rather the failure of the Owner and/or the JOC Consultant to implement the JOC Program properly.

Direct owner leadership, involvement, management, and the exploration/implementation of  opportunities are all key to the successful implementation of any JOC program.

A JOC Operations Manual and/or JOC Execution Guide must be present and a part of the the JOC contractual documents.   They serve a detailed written workbook that defines roles, responsibilities, tools, workflows, metrics, and overall expectations.

Proper and ongoing training must be a requirement, as well as owner and indepent oversight, and supporting technology to assure that adequate controls are in place to mitigate risk.

Owners JOC project management processes must be both efficient and
effective with respect to meeting the operational goals and assuring compliance.

There are always opportunities  for improvement within JOC Programs and JOC program management processes, policies and procedures, however, these cannot be fully realized is JOC program management is outsource to a third party/ JOC consultant.

It is the real property owner’s sole responsibility to mitigate risk, increase organizational efficiency, and align current processes with industry best practices.

Estimating Construction Costs for Job Order Contracts

As an owner, what should you expect from a JOC Program?

  • A low change order rate 5%-16% or lower
  • Elimination of legal disputes
  • Faster project delivery
  • Reduced procurement costs
  • Higher construction quality
  • Higher satisfaction rate for all involved participants, facility end-users, and oversight groups.
  • Reduction in management process redundancies
  • High participation by local and/or disadvantaged contractors

 

Key performance indicators related to Estimating Construction Costs for Job Order Contracts:

  • Average work order/project price
  • Number and dollar value of change orders
  • Basis for change orders (owner vs. contractor changes)
  • Standardized lead-time days for all project stages
  • Project on time.
  • Internal person-hours savings
  • Number of owner/contractor negotiations
  • Costs of JOC projects versus alternative delivery methods
  • Training and certification requirements and compliance
  • JOC work order/task order checklist including clear definition of acceptable JOC projects
  • % of priced versus non-prepriced line items and valuesEstimating Construction Costs for Job Order ContractsEstimating Construction Costs for Job Order Contracts

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
May 9, 2017February 16, 2018Challenges facing Owners LEAN Facilities Management

Challenges facing Owners LEAN Facilities Management

Their are many Challenges facing Owners LEAN Facilities Management in terms of moving from theory to practice.

Achievement of LEAN Facilities Management requires greater focus upon change management as well improving overall owner leadership skills and competency.

In general, real property owners lack an understand of facilities life-cycle and LEAN construction best management practices.

Challenges facing Owners LEAN Facilities Management

Facilities life-cycle and LEAN construction best management practices …

  1. Collaboration will ALL project participants and stakeholders
  2. Common data environment (CDE) and standard data architectures (CSI MasterFormat, Uniformat, Omniclass) – Locally researched and shared/common line item unit price database
  3. Continuous improvement (not being satisfied with the status quo)
  4. Shared risk/reward
  5. Financial transparency
  6. Ongoing REQUIRED training and certification
  7. Design, implementation, and monitoring of LEAN collaborative construction delivery methods (Integrated Project Delivery – IPD, for major new construction, and Job Order Contracting – JOC, for renovation, repair, maintenance, sustainability, and minor new construction)
  8. Leveraging technology for lower cost implementation and consistent deployment and monitoring, versus being the driver
  9. Life-cycle versus first-cost decision-making
  10. Understanding the value of long-term win/win relationships

Challenges facing Owners LEAN Facilities Management

Challenges facing Owners LEAN Facilities Management

Challenges facing Owners LEAN Facilities Management

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
May 8, 2017May 8, 2017LEAN Construction in the Public Sector

LEAN Construction in the Public Sector

LEAN Construction in the Public Sector requires Owners to take responsibility for their facilities and other forms of built structures.

This simply cannot occur until Owners become competent in Collaborative LEAN Construction Delivery Methods and associated life-cycle management of the built environment.

Collaboration and win-win contractual incentives for all participants (AE firms, contractors, subs, owners, building users, oversight groups) are prerequisites to measurable improvements in facilities management outcomes.

Best value procurement, financial transparency, and a common data environment (CDE) must be implemented in concert with a rigorous and sustained focus upon CHANGE MANAGEMENT.

Until real property owners are held accountable in their roles as stewards of the built environment there is no reason to expect that the rampant waste associate with the AECOO sector will diminish (architecture, engineering, construction, owner/operator/operations).

Collaborative, proven, best value LEAN construction delivery methods have existed for decades and are capable consistent achievement of 90%+ of projects on-time, on-budget, and to everyone’s satisfaction.   Thus the issue is not the unavailability of solutions, but rather the level of education and awareness across the AECOO sector.

Total quality management and continuous improvement are industry norms across most other business sectors.  It’s beyond due for implementation throughout our AECOO community.

The failures associated with facilities management are largely the responsibility of property owners and oversight groups.  They pay the bills.  It’s really that simple.

LEAN Construction in the Public Sector

Learn more about LEAN Construction in the Public Sector…

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
May 8, 2017April 5, 2025Job Order Contracting versus Design Bid Build

Job Order Contracting versus Design Bid Build

Job Order Contracting versus Design Bid Build can help to measurably improve construction productivity, quality, delivery times, and overall satisfaction for all participants.

Job order contracting saves significant time and improves quality, consistency, and overall satisfaction vs. traditional design-bid-build.

Efficiently managing the numerous renovation, repair, maintenance, sustainability, and minor new construction projects facing real property owners and facilities management teams is critical to the success of every facilities dependent organization.

Job order contracting is a LEAN collaborative construction procurement and delivery method that that delivers major advantages versus conventional design-bid-build.   The focus placed upon early upfront and ongoing communications and full transparency associated  with Job Order Contracting  is central to improving outcomes.

Even though job order contracting has been successfully practiced in the U.S. since the 1980’s, it remains unknown to many and is commonly poorly implemented.

Job Order Contracting requires competency and leadership on the part of the owner, and an appropriate focus upon change management.    Collaboration, mutual respect and trust among selected service providers and the owner,  and full financial transparency are targeted goals.

A locally researched, independently sourced detailed line item Unit Price Book, UPB, provides the basis for shared project knowledge and transparent pricing.   A properly designed UPB lists common and repetitive commercial construction tasks construction tasks using industry standard terms in plain English.   Each line item includes labor, material, and equipment costs as appropriate.  The UPB generally has approximately 40,000 to 60,000 line items, including demolition line items and line item modifiers.   The latter account for varying quantities, work location, and other variables.    Best management practice notes that the UPB be updated annually and locally researched.

JOC is an  an integrated project delivery (IPD) approach designed specifically for smaller renovation, repair and minor new construction projects, however maintains all the same collaborative principles.

Integrated project delivery ” integrates people, systems, business structures and practices into a process that collaboratively harnesses the talents and insights of all participants to reduce waste and optimize efficiency through all phases of design, fabrication and construction…. Integrated Project Delivery is built on collaboration. As a result, it can only be successful if the participants share and apply common values and goals.” – AIA


Benefits of Job Order Contracting versus Design Bid Build

  • Higher productivity
  • Improved quality and overall satisfaction
  • On-demand services
  • Improved financial visibility
  • Virtual elimination of legal disputes
  • Fewer change orders
  • Fully defined roles, expectations, and deliverables.

Job Order Contracting versus Design Bid Build


Common Myths Associated with Job Order Contracting versus Design Bid Build

  • Higher costs
  • Best to outsource (JOC managed by a JOC consultant versus a JOC Owner)
  • JOC is for everyone
  • JOC can be managed in spreadsheets
  • JOC doesn’t require continuous training
  • Procurement, facility end-users, and technical teams (DPW/facilities management) are not directly involved
  • Owners don’t need to review contractor estimates
  • Owners don’t need to prepare their own internal estimates for some projects.
  • JOC programs don’t need to be audited

Learn more…

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
May 5, 2017May 5, 2017Building Information Modelling BIM & the Construction Industry - Technical Report TR-1405A

Building Information Modelling BIM in the Construction Industry – Technical Report TR-1405A

Building Information Modelling BIM in the Construction Industry – Technical Report TR-1405A

Building Information Modelling BIM in the Construction Industry - Technical Report TR-1405A

The National BIM Standard Definition from 2007, NBIMS states that a BIM is a:
“… digital representation of physical and functional characteristics of a facility. As such it serves as a shared knowledge resource for information about a facility forming a reliable basis for decisions during its life cycle from inception onward”.
To optimise the return on investment and associated impacts upon the environment, stakeholders may be involved in a single aspect or multiple aspects of a BIM system (Cholakis 2012) including design, procurement, construction delivery methods, construction management, condition assessment, repair, renovation, adaptation, utilization, capital planning and budgeting, life/safety and security management.
The BIM system is a collaboration by different stakeholders at different phases of the life cycle of a facility to insert, extract, update or modify information in the BIM to support and reflect the roles of that stakeholder (NBIS 2007). Figure 2.1 summarises the BIM system as the integration of the AECO stakeholders through the utilization of people, processes and systems.

That said, the primary drivers and/or requirements of BIM are process-based and require a laser-like focus upon CHANGE MANAGEMENT and LEAN Collaborative Construction Delivery Methods (Integrated Project Delivery – IPD, and Job Order Contracting – JOC).

The role of technology is simple one, to support lower cost deployment, collaboration, and ongoing management.  Technology, however, should not be the primary driver or main focus.  Lastly, 3D visualization should not be confused with BIM.  BIM can be accomplished without 3D visualization.

Building Information Modelling BIM in the Construction Industry – Technical Report TR-1405A

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
May 2, 2017May 2, 2017Outsourcing Job Order Contracts

Outsourcing Job Order Contracts

Outsourcing Job Order Contracts is contrary to the fundamental concepts this LEAN construction delivery method and at best should be considered only as a temporary solution.

Job order contracting is a collaborative construction delivery method capable of consistently executing 90%+ of renovation, repair, and minor new construction project on-time, on-budget, and to the benefit of all stakeholders… if designed, implemented and managed properly.    That said, while there are many, here are three reasons not to outsource job order contracts.

First, however, a quick explanation about what I mean by outsourcing job order contracts is called for.  Hiring a JOC consultant and paying them a fee based upon the total construction volume, to “manage” a JOC program is basically outsourcing from a business and process perspective.  This is inherently contradictory to the core aspects of JOC such as direct early and ongoing participation by real property owners and building uses, as well as owner leadership and furthermore can create conflicts of interests and even set the stage for fraud.

Organizations, large and small, have difficulty managing the numerous repetitive renovation, repair, and minor new construction projects required to sustain a facility portfolio and maintain performance requirements cost effectively.   Most organizations suffer a large number of project failures:   slow response times, poor quality, excessive costs, and/or excessive costs.

Traditional project delivery methods such as design-bid-build, lowest bidders, and even design-build have provided fully adequate solutions.

Outsourcing Job Order Contracts – Three reasons NOT to do it.

  1. Poor or lack of planning: No on knows your organization better than its own staff.  Building users, technical teams (DPW, engineering), and procurement staff should have the required experience, competence, and local knowledge to provide requisite planning.  Relying upon an outside consultant heightens the risk of poor or lack of planning.   The AECOO industry has suffered far too long from failure to implement change management, specifically a failure to remove the adversarial relationship between real property owners/facilities managers and service providers.  Adding a third party to this mix does little to resolve the situation.
  2. Poor Estimating:  It is key that owner’s review all JOC estimates as well as prepare internal estimates for project over a certain size. This element of a JOC process helps to communicate project requirements via a through review of line item detailed cost estimates as well as mitigate errors and omissions.  Relying upon a third party for this process introduces an increased potential for miscommunication.  It is also important the the cost data used be locally researched, independent, and objective.
  3. Unclear or improper roles:   Every JOC Program should have a written JOC Operations Manual/JOC Execution Guide as part of the contract.  The role of the the real property owner/facilities management is to provide leadership, experience, and local knowledge.   Outsourcing this role immediately negates these responsibilities at worst, and at a minimum creates confusion. The addition of another “layer in the game of telephone” is never a good thing, if it is not adding value.   It generates a situation where the owner/facilities manage assumes the JOC consultant doing a particular task, and is fully compliant with the JOC program and associate rules, regulations, statues.   As multiple independent government audits have demonstrated, the latter is not the case. As a result project timelines and benefits are put at risk.

While there may be reasons to hire a JOC consultant initial to “manage” a JOC Program, owners/facility managers should use this interim period to learn to be self sufficient.   There are currently far too many real properly owners wasting millions of dollars on non-valued-added services, not to mention less than efficient JOC programs versus running efficient owner-managed JOC programs.

Outsourcing Job Order Contracts

Hopefully real property owners, and the AECOO industry as a whole will deals with these addressable, time saving, money saving ideas will increase the success rate and efficiency of their numerous renovation, repair, and minor new construction projects.

What to learn more…

via Four BT, LLC – Independent, Objective, and Best Value LEAN Construction & Job Order Contracting Solutions

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
May 2, 2017May 2, 20172017 Construction Labor Cost Data

2017 Construction Labor Cost Data

To date, 2017 Construction Labor Cost Data shows a increase of 2.5%-2.7% (over 12 months period), indicating a strong overall industry and consistent with forecasts of an approximate 3% increase for the year.  Some trades are anticipated to rise as much as 4%.  (BLS)

Real gross Private investment in nonresidential structures  increased 22% , while government gross investment in structures was down 15% (Bureau of Economic Analysis, BEA).

Private office construction spending increased 29% in 2017, but demand has decreased (Census Bureau).

Locally researched 2017 Construction Labor Cost Data, as well as full line items tasks including labor, material, and equipment, is now available.   Stop relying up “national average” cost books, and get the actionable construction cost data your need!

2017 Construction Labor Cost Data 2017 Construction Labor Cost Data

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
May 1, 2017LEAN Construction Cost Data

LEAN Construction Cost Data

LEAN Construction Cost Data drives an open, transparent approach that is best suited for collaborative construction delivery. 

LEAN Construction Cost Data

While it may be generally recognized that detailed line item construction task definition and associated costing methods provide the most beneficial and defensible form of information, there are multiple issues/concerns that must be considered in order to properly leverage and benefit from this highly refined level of construction costing.

 

Here is a short list of noteworthy factors…

  • Expertise in line item construction cost research
  • Applicability of specifications to the local area
  • Appropriate levels of granular and quantity of line items
  • Cost to adequately research data
  • Locally research versus “national average” cost data
  • Use of common terms, descriptions, and data formats (CSI Masterformat)
  • Update frequency
  • Granularity – Information breakdown for labor, materials, and equipment
  • Productivity – Use of the appropriate crews

Unit price line item cost data collection is expensive in terms of resources required to develop and maintain current and defensible information, thus is generally cost prohibitive for any single real property owner, AE firm, or construction contractor to pursue.
Commercial construction cost databases of approximately 60,000 unit price line are generally adequate to cover 90% or more of commercial projects normally encountered.   Some vendors may boast hundreds of thousands of line items, however databases of this size can actually be counterproductive, by creating confusion, delaying initial implementation, contributing to errors, and even lowering productivity.

LEAN Construction Cost Data

 

Interested in learning more?

Request the OpenCost LEAN Construction Cost Data White Paper…

 

Note: The term “construction” is being used generically to describe any type of construction, including renovation, repair, maintenance, sustainability, and/or new construction projects, unless specifically otherwise stated.

LEAN Construction Cost Data

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
April 28, 2017April 28, 2017Job Order Contract Task Order

Job Order Contract Task Order

Phases of a Job Order Contract Task Order

As a the most widely used LEAN construction delivery method, Job Order Contracting can deliver multiple benefits, including the consistent delivery of over 90% of projects on-time, on-budget, and to the satisfaction of all participants and stakeholders.

That said, Owners must be competent and provide leadership, all participants must act in a transparent, collaborative, and mutually beneficial manner, and process must be implemented consistently.

Below is an example of the process involved in a JOC task order/ JOC construction project.


Phases of JOC Task Order
To help illuminate the lean construction method, here are the specific phases of
the JOC task order life cycle:
PHASE
1
Owner establishes a current construction need, determines preliminary
budget and confirms funding availability.
PHASE
2
Owner team (technical/facilities management, JOC program/project
manager, contracting/purchasing or building user) conducts a pre-proposal
meeting and drafts a JOC task order signed by the JOC contract
administrator.
PHASE
3
Owner team and JOC contractor make a joint site visit and confirm
work scope, site conditions and any unusual requirements.
PHASE
4 Owner creates an independent, detailed, line-item cost estimate using approved, locally researched Unit Price Book, UPB, and approved JOC software  (Note: a national average price book, even with the use of location indexes, is not recommended.)
PHASE
5
Contractor creates estimate. (Both owner and contractor use the
contract-required unit price book.)
PHASE
6
Contractor submits a task order proposal/estimate. Owner compares it
to independent owner estimate.
PHASE
7
Owner and contractor negotiate a review of any variances or conflicts
with the JOC program. There are three possible outcomes: 1) Owner
issues a notice to proceed (NTP) to contractor; 2) Owner issues
specific changes or requests additional information; or 3) Owner
cancels task order.
PHASE
8
A project kickoff meeting takes place and the worksite is handed off to
the contractor.
PHASE
9
Owner conducts weekly site visits and reviews progress reports
submitted by the contractor.
PHASE
10
Project closes out with a final package of warranty and maintenance
information as specified in the JOC operations/execution manual.

Job Order Contract Task Order

Job Order Contract Task Order

via Four BT, LLC – Independent, Objective, & Best Value LEAN Job Order Contracting Solutions & Services

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
April 25, 2017April 25, 2017JOB ORDER CONTRACTING OPPORTUNITIES

JOB ORDER CONTRACTING OPPORTUNITIES

JOB ORDER CONTRACTING OPPORTUNITIES  provides by Four BT, LLC , provider of independent, objective, and best values JOC solutions – UPBs, Technology, Services, & SupportJOB ORDER CONTRACTING OPPORTUNITIES

A list of current (top) and past job order contracting opportunities for contracting serving public sector renovation, repair, and minor new construction requirements.

Title:                      Job Order Contract – Fort Bliss, Texas (includes White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico)

Sol. #:                    W91151-17-R-0066

Agency:                Department of the Army

Office:                  Army Contracting Command, MICC

Location:              MICC – Fort Hood

Posted On:         Apr 24, 2017 3:55 pm

Base Type:         Sources Sought

Link:                       https://www.fbo.gov/notices/168ff16017e411f4c4c91dce86de8ed9

 

——————————————————-

 

Title:                      Job Order Contract – Yuma Proving Grounds

Sol. #:                    W91151-17-R-0065

Agency:                Department of the Army

Office:                  Army Contracting Command, MICC

Location:              MICC – Fort Hood

Posted On:         Apr 24, 2017 3:50 pm

Base Type:         Sources Sought

Link:                       https://www.fbo.gov/notices/b0bfdbd3fb1d16e7548424d318050d5f

 

——————————————————-

 

Title:                      Job Order Contract – Dugway Proving Grounds, Utah

Sol. #:                    W91151-17-R-0064

Agency:                Department of the Army

Office:                  Army Contracting Command, MICC

Location:              MICC – Fort Hood

Posted On:         Apr 24, 2017 3:45 pm

Base Type:         Sources Sought

Link:                       https://www.fbo.gov/notices/c0594948c40f0249ea5fb561c29f40f1

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
April 24, 2017April 24, 2017Job Order Contract Staffing

Job Order Contract Staffing

job order contract staffingJob Order Contract Staffing should include skilled owners and construction contractors, and the limited use of JOC consultants.

Job Order Contract Staffing Requirements

 Direct Owner Involvement – A fundamental premise of Job Order Contracting is owner involvement with all service providers,   Communication and collaboration must be early and ongoing.  In order for this to occur, and for ALL parties to receive the maximum benefit of JOC, owners must be competent and capable with respect to LEAN construction delivery methods and tasks such as detailed line item estimating and owner/contractor negotiations.

While some owners rely upon JOC consultant to manage their JOC Program, this practice should be temporary only.   It is certainly more costly and, as the major of independent JOC Audits have demonstrated, inefficient and potentially subject to inappropriate abuse.

 

     Planning for Staffing Requirements – The initial planning for JOC staffing occurs during the JOC feasibility study. The minimum skills required to support the JOC process include managerial, contract administration, construction management, project management, and quality assurance.

The JOC staffing will change to meet the workload to be managed/performed by using JOC.  Quality assurance personnel should work in close relation to those preparing task orders to facilitate communications, scheduling, and coordination.

     Initial Staffing Requirements – Generally, $2 million to $5 million in annual JOC workload will require the primary or partial responsibilities of four or five staff members. It is recommended that one position be primarily responsible for JOC for purchasing, and that a peer from the technical team also lead that function.  Experienced, competent and credible personnel should be involved in the JOC process.  All personnel assigned JOC responsibilities must be trained to properly perform their job functions. JOC training courses are offered for various owner, professional, and educational groups.

     Training Requirements – Training should begin a minimum of 5 or 6 months before the planned JOC award.  Personnel involved with the JOC contract from both the technical and purchasing teams should visit other locations that are currently executing a JOC contract to gain a working perspective.

via 4BT.US – Independent, Objective, & Best Value Job Order Contracting and LEAN Construction Delivery Solutions – Locally researched unit price books, cloud estimating technology, training, and services.

Want to learn more?

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
April 21, 2017April 21, 2017Job Order Contract Source Evaluation Plan

Job Order Contract Source Evaluation Plan

The primary objective of a Job Order Contract Source Evaluation Plan is to select the service provider that provides the BEST VALUE.

It some markets, one be might surprised to learn that a Job Contract Source Evaluation Plan is either not used, or is basically a simple modification of a typical procurement process.  The net result of such an approach however is a relatively high percentage of Job Order Contracting Programs that are under performing and too costly versus best management practice implementations.

Job Order Contract Source Evaluation Plan

Whether evaluating proposals for a JOC Consultant or JOC construction contractors, following a well thought out and accepted selection evaluation plan should provide the highest likelihood sourcing a contractor capable of delivering contract requirements at a reasonable cost.  This process may result in an award being made to a higher rated, higher priced offeror. In this case, it has been determined that the technical superiority and/or overall business approach, potentially including superior past performance outweighs the initial cost variables, however, the total cost of the program is anticipated to be lower.

Detailed requirements as identified in the Request for Proposal (RFP), and/or solicitation should communicate how evaluation of objective performance requirements will be accomplished and how the offeror will be credited for such performance.
Lowest price, technically acceptable, source selection process is generally not appropriate for JOC or other LEAN construction methods. Overall best value is not as likely to result from a selection that depends exclusively upon technical factors and lowest price. Past experience, and a thorough evaluation of other nontechnical factors afford greater visibility into total capabilities of an offeror.

Use of detailed technical and non-technical evaluation criteria that reflect the requirements of the JOC program enable the owner to emphasize technical ability, management abilities, quality, and past performance in reaching the best possible source selection decision.

Examples of evaluation criteria that have been effectively used wihtin a Job Order Contract Source Evaluation Plan:
(1) Project management ability, including key project management staff, technical support staff and the quality control plan.
(2) Subcontracting support capability and subcontract management, including identification of key subcontractors, purchasing system/level of subcontracting.
(3) Past and present performance information which will demonstrate ability to perform the proposed effort;
(4) Project execution, including sample project preparation/submission; and
(5) Price, including completeness, reasonableness.

Need assistance in developing a Job Order Contract Source Evaluation Plan?

Learn more…

4BT Education, Training, and Certification help to provide valuable insight in the following areas:
  1. Collaborative, LEAN business practices associated with Job Order Contracting
  2. Metrics including Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
  3. How to foster continuous improvement
  4. Financial transparency
  5. Common terms, definitions, and standard data architectures
  6. Methods to build long-term mutually beneficial relationships
  7. Gaining a life-cycle / total-cost-of-ownership perspective versus first-cost mentality
  8. Best value procurement strategies
  9. Enabling technology
  10. Focusing upon Outcomes

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
LEAN Construction Cost Data
April 20, 2017April 20, 2017Hard Construction Costs

Hard Construction Costs

Hard Construction Costs are the detailed tasks, materials, equipment, and labor required to complete a renovation, repair, maintenance, sustainability or new construction project.

They are quantifiable and best determined by an experienced construction cost estimator with at least a decade of line item construction cost estimating under his/her belt.

Hard Construction Cost – Issues with Traditional Methods

Contrary to somewhat general opinion the best method for obtaining hard costs is NOT exclusively from subcontractors.    There are many pitfalls in simply using past experience and subcontractors for only for generating a hard cost estimate:

  1. Over time owners/facilities managers generally use the same subcontractors.  This may result in “cost creep” as both parties become “too comfortable” in how they general cost proposals and issue work.
  2. The above can occur even if the owner/facilities manager shifts work around among a group of contracts or regularly solicits the traditional three (3) quote per project.   Local contractors tend to know what owners will pay for projects.
  3. Unless stipulated otherwise by the owner/facilities manager, the contractor(s) /subcontractor(s) generally provide estimates in their own formats and terms.  This makes it extremely difficult to accurately understand and compare estimates.

Detailed Line Item Construction Estimates –  Apples to Apples

Requiring the use of locally researched detailed unit price book, organized using CSI Masterformat, and noting which line items are modified and not modified provided significant valued to ALL project participants.    (Note:  Using a so-called “National Average” price books, even if one applies cost factors is not the same a s locally researched price book, and  is not recommended.  National average price books are far too general. )

Local for a unit price book that is objective, independent, locally researched and has between 50,000 and 75,000 line items which include the below:

  • Building Structure– Cost associated with the structure including all labor and material required to complete the whole building or structure.   If a buildings, specifically the external shell is key breakdown.   Additional categories include mechanical/HVAC, electrical, foundation, interior, etc.
  • Site– All site work and underground, aerial, water systems, drains, fire, paving, grading, sewers, etc.
  • Landscape –  Grass, lawns, trees, mulch, shrubs, fertilizer, and every other material included in the construction of the projects based on the architectural drawings.
  • Contingency– Contingency is a reserved amount of money covering all estimated unforeseen conditions that might affect the construction process. Although it is not an amount that you can measure, it can be estimated, and generally ranges between five and twenty percent.
  • Overhead & Profit – Temporary facilities, utilities, tools and safety and security costs.  What is included in overhead can vary significantly based upon the associate project delivery method and contract.

How to Estimate Hard Construction Costs

Once their is common understand of the scope of work AND a site walk has been conducted, a detailed line item estimate of hard construction costs can be developed that includes all appropriate quantities in term of number of items, labor hours and crew compositions, material quantities and costs, and equipment costs.  General conditions are also considered and many or may not be included in the line item estimate based upon contract requirements.

Detailed estimates should provide a variance range of +/- 5%  if the project has been clearly communicated and understood by all parties, barring any extenuating circumstances.   At this stage, contingency should be in the 0 to 10 percent range.

Hard Construction Costs

Learn more…

 

via Four BT, LLC  – Independent, Objective, and Best Value JOC & LEAN Construction Solutions, including locally  researched line item cost databases.

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
https://4bt.us/job-order-contracting/
April 20, 2017April 20, 2017Construction Project Management

Construction Project Management

Construction Project Management activities, adequately supported by LEAN construction processes (JOC, IPD,PPP), a common data environment(CDE), and technologies such as the Cloud and BIM allow savvy AECOO[1] organizations to more consistently achieve a higher quality and productivity gains.

Construction Project Management

Construction Project Management

The complexity of the new construction, renovation, repair, and maintenance project activities requires the integration of people with varying areas of expertise and skill levels that may or may not be co-located.

The ability to share and edit current common actionable information provides major benefits. Properly designed and implemented Collaborative LEAN Construction Project Management consistently delivers 90%+ of projects on-time, on-budget, and to everyone’s satisfaction.

Cloud Construction Project Management Solutions allow enables teams to collaborate more quickly and efficiently by providing appropriate access to current and actionable information.

LEAN Construction Delivery Methodology, supported by Cloud Construction Project Management, allows all participants and stakeholders to progress beyond the “modeling” and “visualization” capabilities of BIM, to the real-time critical “information” sharing level throughout the life-cycle any form of physical infrastructure.

The Cloud allows everyone to work in teams and share information in a way that was never before possible.   Increased focus upon actionable current information “Big BIM” and higher levels of connectivity and transparency enable greater focus upon outcomes.

A CDE (Commom Data Environment), a mutually understood set of terms, definitions, and data formats, also greatly assists everyone to understand the current and potential future status of physical infrastructure and associated activities.

Facilities management and service providers can make more informed choices and more consistently obtain higher quality and productivity.

Building in Cloud is designed precisely to meet these needs: to share and manage building and project information and drive greater team performance.  

Try Building in Cloud for a month for free… you’ll be amazed at how you can increase the efficiency of your organization.

2017, Cholakis, P. (Four BT) Moscardi, L. (Lemsys)

[1] AECOO – Architecture, Engineering, Construction, Owner, Operator/Operations

via Four BT, LL – Independent, Objective, & Best Value JOC and LEAN Construction Delivery Solutions

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
April 19, 2017April 20, 2017Estimate Construction Costs

Estimate Construction Costs

Learning how to estimate construction costs will minimal variation requires a decade or move of experience and observing several key LEAN construction best management practices including collaboration, transparency, standard terms/data architectures, and continuous improvement.

Estimate Construction Costs

It is generally recognized that detailed line item construction task definition and associated costing methods provide the most beneficial and defensible form of information.

That said, there are multiple related issues/concerns that must be considered in order to properly leverage and benefit from this highly refined level of construction costing.     These include, but may not be limited to the following;

  • Expertise in line item construction cost research
  • Applicability of specifications to the local area
  • Appropriate levels of granular and quantity of line items
  • Cost to adequately research data

Estimate Construction Costs

Unit price line item cost data collection is expensive in terms of resources required to develop and maintain current and defensible information.  It is generally cost prohibitive for any single real property owner, AE firm, or construction contractor to maintain a cost research staff capable of generating an actionable 30,000 to 60,000 commercial construction line item database.

Learn more and request the 20 page white paper…

via Four BT, LLC – Independent, Objective, and Best Value JOC & LEAN Construction Solutions

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
April 18, 2017April 20, 2017Traditional Construction Cost Estimating

Traditional Construction Cost Estimating

Traditional Construction Cost Estimating

Traditional Construction Cost Estimating can benefit from LEAN business practices, a focus upon education and training, and collaborative technology.

Bills of Quantity (BOQ),Bill of Materials (BOM), and/or detailed line item methods provide the lowest level, and/or most granular construction costs.  The opposite end of the spectrum, and least detailed, includes Order of Magnitude and Square Foot Costs.

Traditional Construction Cost Estimating at a detailed level fully considers construction components, tasks, quantities, and costs inclusive of materials, equipment, and labor items.  Tasks are generally organized in a consistent manner by trade, associated with a construction[1] project.  Quantities are expressed as “each”, “square feet”, “square yards”, “cubic yards”, “hours”, and related local standards of measure.

The sources of the information generally include historical cost data, estimator experience, and independent third parties (cost consultants, public “reference” information, and subcontractors).

A unit price includes material, labor and equipment for each component and/or construction task/activity at a granular level.  A total project is therefore represented by multiple line items.  Based upon the source and type of information, there significantly differences in levels of sophistication, detail and quality occur.

It is generally recognized that detailed line item construction task definition and associated costing methods provide the most beneficial and defensible form of information.  That said, there are multiple related issues/concerns that must be considered in order to properly leverage and benefit from this highly refined level of construction costing.     These include, but may not be limited to the following;

  • Expertise in line item construction cost research
  • Applicability of specifications to the local area
  • Appropriate levels of granular and quantity of line items
  • Cost to adequately research data

Unit price line item cost data collection is expensive in terms of resources required to develop and maintain current and defensible information.  It is generally cost prohibitive for any single real property owner, AE firm, or construction contractor to maintain a cost research staff capable of generating an actionable 30,000 to 60,000 commercial construction line item database.

Traditional Construction Cost Estimating

Learn more about the available locally researched unit price cost databases…

[1] The term “construction” is being  used generically to describe any type of construction, including renovation, repair, maintenance, sustainability, and/or new construction projects, unless specifically otherwise stated.

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
April 13, 2017April 20, 2017Uncategorized

Facilities Lifecycle Management

Facilities Lifecycle Management requires increased competency on the part of facilities owners and facilities management.  See asset life-cycle model…

A total cost of ownership perspective is also required as opposed to the more prevalent practice of first-cost dominance.

LEAN collaborative construction delivery and similar best management practices provide a framework for generating positive facilities management outcomes versus economic and environmental waste.

Facilities Lifecycle Management

The Top 10 List when considering BIG BIM and Facilities Lifecycle Management:

1. Collaboration – involvement of all stakeholders – Owners, AE’s, Contractors, Oversight Groups, Community …

2. Transparency – Appropriate access to cost information, and associated comparison to published independent third-party costs, such as RSMeans Construction Cost Data.

3. Consistent Format and Terminology – Use of a standard set of terms and data architectures such as Uniformat, Masterformat,and Omniclass.

4. Metrics and Benchmarks – Time, Accuracy, Conditions, Cost…

5. Proper allowances for local conditions – geographic, weather, productivity of labor, security, …

6. Appropriate level of technology to assure productivity, collaboration, security, audit trail.

7. Robust Process – The application of a robust process and business “best-practices” with a focus upon continuous improvement.

8. Appropriate knowledge of all “levels” of construction cost estimating, cost engineering, and their potential accuracy – Square Foot / Conceptual / Building Level Construction Cost Estimating, Assembly / System Level Construction Cost Estimating, Unit Line Item Construction Cost Estimating.

9. Knowledge of the impact of the Construction Cost Delivery Method upon construction costs and life-cycle costs – Design-Bid-Build, CM@Risk, Design-Build, Job Order Contracting, Integrated Project Delivery

10. Fundamental understanding of Total Cost of Ownership and Facilities Lifecycle Management – Physical and functional conditions, Operations, Sustainability, Renovation, Repair, Efficient Project Delivery Methods (IPD-Integrated Project Delivey, JOC – Job Order Contracting)

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
April 11, 2017JOC Cooperative

JOC Cooperative

A JOC Cooperative is a method of procuring and implementing job order contracting services primarily for public sector agencies that anticipate an annual JOC construction volume of less than $2,000,000.

Using a JOC Cooperative enables eligible entities to meet requirements associated with providing legally mandate competition for contracts of commonly purchased products and services, while saving the the cost of going through the traditional procurement process for each and every renovation, repair, or minor new construction project.

JOC Cooperative

JOC construction contractors benefit as well by having a multi-year contract and saving the time and expense of going through the procurement process for each individual participating governmental entity.

All Cooperatives are NOT the same however.  Here ares some items to look for when evaluating and selecting a JOC Cooperative.

JOC Cooperative

  1. Is the Cooperative a public agencies or a private agency.  Very few JOC cooperatives are actually public agencies, and are private corporations linked to public agencies.  This can be an important factor in terms of the motivations of the JOC Cooperative and in terms of assuring there is no potential for fraud or misuse.
  2. Fees.  Some Cooperatives require excessive fees while not provided services to justify them.
  3. Services.  The JOC Cooperative, at a minimum, should provide the following services: On-site, regional, and virtual training at all levels; JOC estimating services for public agency members, JOC audits.
  4. Unit Price Books:  The unit price book should be locally researched and not based upon a national average and/or reliant upon location factors or localization indices.  Unit Price Books should be independent and objective, and based upon prevailing and/or Davis-Bacon wage rates as statues require.
  5. Cloud based JOC software.   Cloud-based and JOC specific software should be available and required for all awarded contractors and member agencies.   At a minimum software must be integrated with the unit price book, manage coefficients, and note priced and non-prepriced line items within appropriate JOC/task order estimates.

Note:  If, as a public agency, your JOC construction volume reaches $2M/year or more, it is time to consider setting up your own JOC program

Learn more….

via www.4bt.us – Independent, objective, & best value JOC Soutions

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
April 10, 2017LEAN Construction Masterformat

LEAN Construction Masterformat

In general, it is advantageous, if not a best management practice, to require all renovation. repair, maintenance, construction projects, as well as all participants and stakeholders, to use common terms, definitions, and standardized data architectures.

If this were done, there would be far fewer misunderstandings, errors, omissions, change orders, etc.

OMINCLASS, Uniformat, MasterFormat are all all extremely valuable and should be required in North America, and “interchangeable” formats developed on a worldwide basis.

COBie should  be fully  compatible and not divergent.

Standardized “glossaries” &  data architectures combined with LEAN Construction Methodologies &  increased competence and leadership on the part of real property owners (and all service providers), would go a lot further to solving the rampant waste so common throughout the AECOO sector than the “obsession with 3D visualization”.    Tech will not sole much on its own.

Tech is important, but…

As a clear line item description of construction tasks, including labor, equipment, and materials, is critical to a common understand of the scope of work, a unit price book organized by CSI Masterformat should be a component of every job.

LEAN Construction Masterformat

An accurate and shared description of all work task and a clear indication of budgetary requirements is a fundamental element of project success.   It’s amazing how many construction projects lack this basic foundation.

LEAN Construction  www.4BT.US

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
April 7, 2017April 20, 2017JOC Consultants

Why Public Sector Building Owners Should NOT Pay Percentage-based Compensation to JOC Consultants

JOC Consultants

Hiring JOC Consultants to basically outsource Job Order Contract Program management and providing payment to the JOC Consultant as a percentage of total construction volume is JUST PLAIN WRONG.
Here are the reasons why….
  1. Higher potential for conflict of interest and fraud.   The JOC consultant is being paid based upon construction volume, thus the more money spent, the more money the JOC contractor makes.   There is little, if any reason for the JOC consultant to save money/reduce costs.   Secondly, if the JOC consultant has ANY impact upon approving JOC project the conflict of interest is clearly problematic.
  2. Lack of Owner involvement & leadership.  A key benefit of JOC is early and ongoing collaboration and transparency information sharing between the real property owner technical and procurement teams and the awarded JOC construction contractor. The relationship and dynamic is key to a win-win relationship that enables over 90% of JOC project to be delivered on-time, on-budget, and to everyone’s satisfaction.   This fundamental benefit of JOC can easily be lost if a JOC consultant is placed in the middle.
  3. Higher JOC Program Costs.  Another major benefit of JOC is high productivity and more dollars spent on beneficial, best value renovation, repair, and construction projects versus on procurement costs and waste.    With JOC consultant fees ranging from approximately 2.5% to 8.0% of construction volume, some owners literally are paying hundreds of thousands of dollars and millions of dollars in consulting fees.   This just doesn’t make sense.  Any competent owner could easily pay for their own staff and run a more efficient program internally at these levels and attained a significantly higher return on investment (ROI).
So who would hire a JOC consultant per the above and why?
In general County and State government engage in this practice.  They do so for a variety of reasons.
First, County and State governments are generally not as savvy as other sectors with respect to facility management best practices.  In terms of FM expertise, the DOD sector is recognized by many as a leading source of competence and best practices, followed by higher education.
Second, some public agencies are simply using JOC as a method to speed procurement by bypassing traditional procurement practices.   In fact, multiple independent audits have noted both of these concerns, and virtually all involved County and State Government agencies.
Job Order Contracting can provide significant benefits and cost saving, IF designed, implemented, and managed properly.    Outsourcing Job Order Contracting, just like outsourcing facilities management, however, is likely not a viable long term practice.   Facilities are NOT commodities.  Facilities and other forms of physical infrastructure are generally critical to the mission of organizations.   We should all manage them properly.
Learn more…
I'd like the following

www.4BT.US
 JOC Consultants

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
April 7, 2017April 7, 2017Definitive To Guide Job Order Contracting

The Definitive Guide To Job Order Contracting

Request The Definitive Guide to  Order Contracting to learn:

How to create a solid Job Order Contracting Program to meet your goals
What stakeholders to involve across the organization
How to identify, prioritize, and profile JOC Projects/Task Orders
What information you need to support a JOC strategy
What internal and external teams to leverage and how to coordinate them
How to measure the effectiveness of your JOC strategy

Definitive Guide to Job Order Contracting 

Definitive guide to job order contracting

Request: info@4BT.US

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
April 7, 2017Construction Document Information Management

Construction Document Information Management

Construction Document Information Management is central to productivity improvement.

Construction Document Information Management

Construction Document Information Management

2017, Cholakis, P. (Four BT) Moscardi, L. (Lemsys)

Imagine the ability to rapidly organize data and leverage mobile tools to enable access to, and the management of, actionable, standardized, defensible  information… anytime and anywhere.

Streamlining Construction Document Information Management processes is an essential step towards improving productivity, quality, and overall value for all stakeholders.   The process creates a competitive advantage for innovative construction companies.

A Construction Document Management System must allow the visualization of the most common files used in the construction industry such as detailed line item construction cost estimates, required forms, drawings and BIM models.

Time spent looking for the right information accounts for approximately 13% of an employee’s time each and every week.   Up to $10,000, or more, is be wasted annually, per employee, just on looking for the right information.  This does not nclude the cost of not finding the correct information in a timely manner, or using the wrong information.

In the construction industry companies the situation if far worse.  It’s not usual for project managers to spend 30% of their time searching for the information needed to carry out their activities within e-mail, paper documents/paper binders, and digital files that are not shared or centrally located.

In addition, by 2020 digital information will be increased by 30 times. Survival for many AECOO (Architecture-Engineering-Construction-Owner-Operation) will require the adoption of information management tools expressly designed for LEAN collaborative processes and/or workflows.


Appropriate, current, and actionable digital document must be available to participants and stakeholders.

Construction Document Information Management and LEAN Construction Delivery are key focal areas to be addressed by AECOO organizations.  Real transformation is required, thus a successful change management programs must be supports by everyone.   Only those that are successful this effort will achieve increased business productivity and efficiency, while reducing operating costs.

Operating separately, isolated from the value chain, is rapidly becoming unsustainable.

Where to start?

Here are a few essential points to consider when planning a collaborative documents and LEAN construction delivery strategy.

  • Cloud Access
  • Efficient and varied search tools
  • Document versions and revision management
  • User access permissions and privileges management
  • Viewers for common files used
  • Collaboration among team members
  • Management and tracking of requests for changes/issues found in documents
  • Common industry standard terms and definitions – Common Data Environment, CDE
  • Standardized data architecture (CSI MasterFormat, Uniformat, Omniclass) – – Common Data Environment, CDE
  • Integration of LEAN Construction Delivery Methods and Workflows (Integrated Project Delivery, IPD, Job Order Contracting, JOC)
  • Consideration of Life-cycle Management of the Built Environment and Asset Total Cost of Ownership

The 4BT-CE Cloud Estimating & Building in Cloud Solution is an example of a framework expressly designed to meet the needs of the AECOO community to share and manage information of a building as well as ensuring greater efficiency in team activities.   Current, actionable, and commonly formatted information is available to all team members (internal and external) anywhere, anytime and from any device (PC, Tablet or Smartphone).

A free trial is available, and costs are as low as $26.90/month per unlimited number of concurrent users.

 

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
April 3, 2017April 3, 2017Uncategorized

4BT-CE OpenJOC Building in Cloud

4BT-CE OpenJOCTM Building in Cloud

The Best Value Cloud-based Job Order Contracting Solution

Are you paying excessive fees?

Are you using “average national price data” and location factors?

4BT-CE Building in Cloud JOC software, 4BT Unit Price Book,  our 4BT Staff support provide the products and capabilities to deploy and execute a best management practice Job Order Contracting Program.

OpenJOC Building in Cloud

The 4BT CE Building in Cloud platform and services incorporate all of the following features and capabilities and more.
  1. Host multiple JOC UPBs (source and year)
  2. Lock  your JOC UPB per contract
  3. Rapid and easy JOC UPB line item Search and Selection
  4. Automatically apply coefficient to associated Contract/Estimate
  5. Contract, Project, Estimate, Document, Contractor, Task, UPB Management
  6. Cloud deployment
  7. Automatic reporting of Price and Non-prepriced (NPP) line items
  8. Support for multiple coefficients
  9. Ease of Use
  10. Regional, On-site, and Virtual Training
 LEARN MORE>>>

Basic Module includes….

4BT-CE-User Administration User Assignments/Privileges
4BT-CE-Dashboard Calendar, Open/Closed Issues, Assignments
4BT-CE-Login/Authentication Secure Login
4BT-CE-Estimating Cost Estimating
4BT-CE-Reporting Reporting & Export to Excel/PDF
4BT-CE-Estimating/Estimate Management Manage Estimating
4BT-CE-Estimating-Browse Price List Price List – Read Only
4BT-CE-User Profile User Information-Name, Title, Photo, Contact Info, Language, Time Zone, Units of Measure, Date/Time Formats, Currency Time/format, Privacy, Security
4BT-CE-Systems Alert System Notifications
4BT-CE-Message Center Internal Messaging / System Email
4BT-CE-Settings Organization Level – General Information, Subscriptions, Roles and Permissions
4BT-CE-Subscription User Level Subscription Information
Buildings Building Information
Team Team Information
Documents Document Management
Tasks Task Creation and Management
Issues Issue Creation/Management
Spaces Space Information/Management
Options – Below are Optional
BIM BIM model viewing
Custom Reports Client defined Reports
Custom Documents Client requested/defined Documents

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
March 29, 2017March 29, 2017Best Practice Job Order Contracting

Best Practice Job Order Contracting

Best Practice Job Order Contracting

The DOD has long been recognized as the leader in best practice job order contracting.  Other non-DOD Federal Government Agencies and Higher Education follow in a close second in terms of level of general knowledge and skill.  County, State, and Local Governments, include secondary education unfortunately continue to use JOC simply as a means to speed delivery and bypass traditional procurement versus as a LEAN collaborative construction delivery method.  These markets also rely up a troublesome practice of relying up JOC consultants to play key JOC administrative roles, if not basically outsource their JOC programs.  The latter is fundamentally in opposition to JOC’s basic principles and in some cases a breeding ground for potential program misuse and fraud (see various independent and internal audit of JOC Programs).  Thus while County, State, and Local Governments in general have a ways to go in deploying Best Practice Job Order Contracting, the potential benefit are certainly worth the effort.

The following provides a good introduction to best practice Job Order Contracting.  Note that for
“speed reading”, key items have been highlighted in “red”.

AFARS PART 5117

Best Practice Job Order Contracting

Best Practice Job Order Contracting

AFARS – PART 5117

SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS

(Revised September 23, 2015)

 

Best Practice Job Order Contracting

Subpart 5117.90 – Job Order Contracts

5117.9000 Scope of subpart.

(a) Job Order Contracting (JOC) is an alternative contracting method to fulfill requirements for sustainment, restoration, and modernization (SRM) projects at installation level (post, camp or station), with an estimated value exceeding $2000, but not exceeding the amount of SRM authority delegated to the installation by the ACOM and/or HQDA. In general, proposed projects valued at $2,000 or less are considered inappropriate for ordering under JOC because of the administrative costs associated with processing JOC orders and the simplified purchase methods available for these actions. [AFARS Revision #15, dated February 17, 2005]

(b) Additional information on executing JOC is found in the JOC Guide published by the JOC Steering Committee. The guide may be obtained from Assistant Chief Of Staff (Installation Management), Attn: DAIM-FDF-M, 7701 Telegraph Road, Bldg. 2594, Alexandria, VA 22315-3800.

Best Practice Job Order Contracting

5117.9001 Definitions.

As used in this subpart –

“Coefficient” means a numerical factor that represents costs (generally indirect costs) not considered to be included in “Unit Price Book” unit prices (e.g., general and administrative and other overhead costs, insurance costs, bonding and alternative payment protection costs, protective clothing, equipment rental, sales tax and compliance with tax laws, and also contractor’s profit). Contingencies such as changes in wage rates and the effect of inflation in option years are also covered in the coefficient when Economic Price Adjustment is not used. Coefficients proposed by offerors are multiplied times the unit prices in the Unit Price Book to price a job or project on individual orders. The coefficient(s) proposed by the offeror and accepted by the Government are incorporated in the JOC. [AFARS Revision #15, dated February 17, 2005]

“Job order contract” means an indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contract which is awarded on the basis of full and open competition and effective competition and is used to execute sustainment, restoration and modernization projects at installation (post, camp, or station) level. The JOC includes a comprehensive collection of detailed repair, maintenance and minor construction task descriptions or specifications, units of measure and pre-established unit prices for each of these discrete tasks. Each project or job ordered under a JOC is normally comprised of a number of pre-described and pre-priced tasks. [AFARS Revision #15, dated February 17, 2005]

“Non-prepriced task or item” means a necessary, but incidental, part of a job or project ordered or to be ordered under a JOC that is not susceptible to unit pricing using the pre-priced tasks in the Unit Price Book or database incorporated in the JOC. The coefficient developed for a prepriced task or item must not be applied to a non-pre-priced task or item.

“Unit Price Book” means the compilation of sustainment, restoration, and modernization tasks, associated units of measure and unit prices that are used in job order solicitations and JOC. JOC unit prices include direct material, labor and equipment costs, but not indirect costs or profitswhich are addressed in the coefficient(s). Depending upon the source of the data base used, the Unit Price Base (UPB) may contain from 25,000-90,000 line items. [AFARS Revision #15, dated February 17, 2005]

Best Practice Job Order Contracting

5117.9002 Applicability.

(a) JOC may be used to execute sustainment, restoration, and modernization projects at an installation. [AFARS Revision #15, dated February 17, 2005]

(b) JOC must only be used for the projects covered at 5117.9000. Installation facilities engineering support services, such as utility plant operation, custodial, grounds maintenance, refuse collection and disposal, and similar work cannot be acquired using JOC. Architect-engineer services as defined in FAR 36.102 cannot be acquired under JOC. However, informal (shop) drawings, incidental to the job, reflecting the plan of action and the completed project, are anticipated under JOC.

Best Practice Job Order Contracting

5117.9003 Use of job order contracts.

5117.9003-1 Characteristics.

In general, a JOC involves the following unique characteristics:

(a) Use of a “Unit Price Book” to pre-price the direct material, labor, and equipment costs associated with tasks listed in the book coupled with one or more “coefficient(s)” to cover contractor profit and indirect costs.

(b) A solicitation and contract which contain a large volume of pre-priced, elementary, facilities engineering type, detailed tasks that are normally available on an automated database;

(c) Competitive source selection based on an integrated assessment of capability and past performance, technical and management proposals, sample task proposal, and the coefficient(s) proposed for the base year and option years, as appropriate (best value). (Selection of Architects and Engineers statute procedures must not be used for evaluation or award of JOC.)

(d) An indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (task order) contract which provides for the use of negotiated, definitive, bilateral orders (i.e., the JOC contractor formally accepts the order, as mutually agreed, by signing the DD Form 1155; see 5117.9004-3(h)); and

(e) Each signed task order becomes, in effect, a fixed price, lump sum contract and is managed accordingly.

Best Practice Job Order Contracting

5117.9003-3 Planning and coordination.

(a) JOC should be considered when an installation’s projected sustainment, restoration, and modernization workload is anticipated to be of such a yearly volume that benefits to be derived from JOC use are greater than the costs of the Government resources and contractor overhead associated with establishing and using a JOC. These costs include the total Government resources required to award, use, monitor and administer the JOC and JOC orders as well as management oversight and functional support of the total JOC process. The calculated workload for a potential JOC should exclude –

(1) Work normally reserved for 8(a) or set aside for small disadvantaged businesses;

(2) Repetitive tasks that are not complex (such as interior and exterior painting, sanding and finishing/sealing of floors, roofing, etc.) and are traditionally covered by requirements contracts;

(3) Work covered by contracts awarded under the Commercial Activities Program; and

(4) Work that can be effectively and economically accomplished by in-house resources. [AFARS Revision #15, dated February 17, 2005]

(b) A market survey must establish that more than one capable firm is willing to compete for a JOC at the installation.

Best Practice Job Order Contracting

5117.9004 Procedures.

5117.9004-1 Presolicitation.

(a) The DPW must document the decision and plan to use a JOC in support of an installation or activity. The garrison commander, who cannot re-delegate this authority, must approve the decision and plan. The decision to use JOC must also be documented and approved when the JOC is re-solicited. [AFARS Revision #15, dated February 17, 2005]

(b) To solicit for a JOC, the Government must develop task specifications and a Unit Price Book tailored to the needs of the installation to be supported. Any special range pricing (to get quantity discounts) of units associated with the requirements of known JOC projects to be ordered must be specified.

Best Practice Job Order Contracting

5117.9004-2 Solicitation.

(a) The contracting officer, in coordination with the installation DPW, must assure that the specifications and Unit Price Book have undergone technical review and validation and are tailored to meet the projected requirements of the installation and local economic conditions. This is a critical step in implementing JOC and is required to minimize the need for non-pre-priced items during the processing of task orders. The projects proposed to be ordered under JOC must be identified in internal documentation, and a representative description must be included in the solicitation.

(b) To encourage competition and lower coefficients, the JOC solicitation must include realistic and reasonable annual minimum and maximum dollar amounts for projected requirements. Generally, the higher the minimum is, the lower the coefficient proposed will be. The annual maximum is connected with the bonding requirement (see the definition at 5117.9001).

(c) The guaranteed minimum for the basic contract and each option period is required. A new minimum guarantee must be obligated upon exercise of an option. The minimum guarantee need not be the same amount that was used to secure the work of the basic contract. However, it must be more than a token amount so that adequate consideration exists.

(d) Because of the complexity of small and small disadvantaged business utilization issues in relation to JOC, a DD Form 2579 is required for proposed JOC solicitations. The Small Business Specialist must send a copy of the DD Form 2579 to the Director, Office of Small Business Programs.

(e) The Government’s unilateral right to withdraw a proposed job or order before or after receipt of contractor’s proposal must be included in the solicitation.

(f) The solicitation must explain the make-up of the Government unit prices and specify what types of costs, as a minimum, must be covered by the coefficient. (See 5117.9001 for definition.) Offerors must specify in their proposal what additional types of costs are included in their coefficients. These additional costs may be incorporated in the contract, if appropriate, and may preclude later disagreements over non-pre-priced tasks. “Pricing” of option periods, to include consideration of any wage adjustments when Economic Price Adjustment is not used (see 5117.9004-2(i)), must be covered by contractor’s coefficient(s) proposed for those periods. Separate coefficients may be used for normal working hours and other than normal working hours.

(g) JOC solicitations and contracts must clearly notify offerors of initial and continuing bonding requirements. The term “bonding” used in this paragraph includes any relevant alternative payment protection as discussed in FAR 28.102-1. Bonding must be sufficient to cover the stated estimated annual maximum contract value. No JOC contract shall cite the total estimated maximum value of the contract (including option periods) as the estimated annual maximum value, although there may be language in the contract allowing ordering beyond that “maximum” but less than the estimated value of the total contract with option periods. The estimated annual maximum value will be a reasonable figure based on historical experience and known workload for the coming year. This approach should avoid the prior difficulties associated with adjusting bonding coverage every time a new task order is awarded. Because contractors can now plan their liability for premiums, and because they get unliquidated/unneeded premiums reimbursed by the bonding agent, payment incrementally through the use of the coefficient becomes both logical and reasonable. Contractors must be clearly notified, in the solicitation and contract, of their responsibility for ensuring sufficient bond coverage during the course of the contract. All costs associated with bonding (specifically including bond premiums) shall be included in the coefficient. If the estimated annual maximum value is exceeded, FAR 28.102-2(a) and (b) apply. Since the bond premium is repaid through the coefficient and the coefficient is paid as an indirect cost under progress payment or other normal payment provisions there will be no separate repayment(s) for bond premiums.

(h) JOC solicitations and contracts must contain provisions for making annual adjustments to the option year(s) prices. This must be done by updating the base year coefficient using criteria and predetermined formulas in an economic price adjustment (EPA) clause. Adjustments to the base year coefficient will be based on the Engineering News Record (ENR) Building Cost Index (BCI) as published by McGraw Hill. The ENR index is a weighted aggregate of changes to construction costs. For computation of the EPA, the BCI for the city closest to the supporting installation will be used. EPA will not be used for JOCs awarded outside the United States; nor shall it be used under National Guard Bureau, and other, JOC contracts employing an annually updated catalog. JOC solicitation and contracts must use annual adjustments or annually updated catalog, but not both. The clause set forth in 5152.237-9000 must be used in JOC contracts in accordance with this paragraph. Use of EPA under regional or multi-site JOCs with multiple coefficients is at the discretion of the contracting officer on a case-by-case basis but should be declared in the affected solicitations. Any deviation from the required use of EPA (and this EPA clause) for pricing option years, or the use of the specified index (BCI), must require prior approval from DAIM-FDF and SAAL-PP.

(i) Job order solicitations must be accorded the same type of planning and management review as commercial activities procurement actions.

[AFARS Revision #21, dated May 22, 2007]

Best Practice Job Order Contracting

5117.9004-3 Ordering.

(a) Summary of ordering process. After the requirement is validated in accordance with command or installation procedures and an estimate is prepared to determine suitability of the project for the JOC, the SOW is presented to the contractor with a request for a proposal. The contractor then prepares a proposal that identifies the tasks and quantities necessary to accomplish the job. This proposal is subsequently evaluated, and agreement is reached on quantities, time, performance period, etc., through discussions and negotiations. After agreement, a fixed-price bilateral order is prepared. (Some integral non-pre-priced work may be included in the order. (See (e)(2).)

(b) Statement of work.

(1) The SOW for the proposed order must contain sufficient detail to enable the Government to develop an independent government estimate (IGE), for orders $100,000 or more, and to assure that the contractor can properly prepare a responsive and cost effective proposal with a minimum of non-pre-priced tasks.

(2) The SOW must be updated prior to issuing the order to reflect the details of the negotiated agreement and to include significant quantities, methods of construction, quality levels, and number of days to complete the work. This updated SOW may also include a statement that the work must be performed in accordance with the method and quality of construction specified in the contractor’s proposal. Other pertinent aspects of the contractor’s proposal may also be specifically cited as deemed appropriate; however, the entire contractor’s proposal will not ordinarily be made a part of the SOW. The updated SOW must contain sufficient detail to allow the Government to effectively monitor the contractor’s performance.

(c) Independent Government estimate (IGE).

(1) In accordance with FAR Part 36.203, a detailed IGE for orders $100,000 or more, should be obtained prior to evaluation of the contractor’s proposal. This IGE is in addition to the earlier gross estimate, which helped determine whether the proposed work was appropriate for JOC. The IGE shall be prepared using the same method required of the contractor (e.g., the Unit Price Book). A detailed analysis of all task orders is required for orders less than $100,000 in order to aid in the determination of a fair and reasonable price.

(2) Total or lump sum IGEs are not acceptable for proposed JOC task orders. The IGE must be sufficiently detailed to be useful in evaluating, not only the reasonableness of the contractor’s proposed price, but also any costs associated with non-pre-priced tasks.

(3) The contracting officer or, if applicable, the ordering officer, must insure that significant differences among the SOW, the IGE, and the contractor’s proposal are reconciled and documented prior to placing the order.

(4) To the extent practicable, identify non-pre-priced tasks in advance and treat them as discrete items in the IGE to help determine if the price of the non-pre-priced work is reasonable and to help calculate the relative value of the non-pre-priced work.

Best Practice Job Order Contracting

(d) Negotiations.

(1) Negotiations on orders $100,000 or more may not begin without an Independent Government Estimate (IGE).

(2) Negotiations will further reconcile differences among the IGE, SOW, and the contractor’s proposal.

(3) At the conclusion of negotiations, the contracting officer or ordering officer must prepare a memorandum of negotiation and place it in the contract file.

Best Practice Job Order Contracting

(e) Limitations.

(1) The value of non-pre-priced work under an order must not exceed 10 percent of the value of the pre-priced work.

(i) The value of the pre-priced work must be computed by multiplying the coefficient(s) times the appropriate unit price(s) in the Unit Price Book.

(ii) When the contract allows, indirect costs and profit for non-pre-priced work may be attributed by application of a solicited and pre-agreed rate to be applied to the bare labor, equipment, and material costs of the non-pre-priced work.

(iii) Description of non-pre-priced work must not be manipulated or forced to fit under a pre-priced line item, either to avoid including non-pre-priced line items in the order or to reduce the value of non-pre-priced line items in an attempt to circumvent the limitation in (e)(2).

(2) Except as provided in paragraph (3) below, the value of non-prepriced work under an order shall not exceed 10 percent of the value of the prepriced work.

(3) Normally, if the value of the non-prepriced work exceeds 10 percent, then the non-prepriced work should be reduced, eliminated or performed in house or the job must be acquired using other contracting methods. However, contracting officers may exceed the 10 percent if the non-prepriced portion of the order involves urgent or emergency situations or if the contracting officer determines it is a good business decision. The contracting officer shall negotiate the modification and make a determination that the price is fair and reasonable.

(f) Funding. Funds for the guaranteed minimum amount must be obligated on the awarded JOC. Contract performance and cumulative orders under the guaranteed minimum amount are not limited to the fiscal year in which the contract becomes effective. Funds beyond the guaranteed minimum required to complete a proposed project must be obligated by each task order. Orders beyond the guaranteed minimum must also comply with the bona fide need principles in AR 37-1, statutory and other restrictions on year-end spending.

Best Practice Job Order Contracting

(g) Forms, numbering and reports.

(1) Use DD Form 1155 to issue task orders. Include the following statement in Block 19 of the DD Form 1155:

“Contractor must sign this task order in Block 16 and return a copy. The signature in Block 16 reflects contractor’s acceptance of the task order.”

(2) Use Standard Form 30 to execute modifications to a task order. When signed by an Ordering Officer, the SF 30 must be modified by deleting the words “Contracting Officer, United States of America” and typing in “Ordering Officer, Authorized Representative of the Contracting Officer”.

(3) The contracting officer responsible for the actions of specific ordering officers must retain control over assignment of all Supplementary Procurement Instrument Identification Numbers (SPIINS) related to JOC task orders. (See DFARS subpart 204.70.)

(4) The contracting officer must also be responsible for ensuring timely preparation and submission of procurement reporting forms and related reports and data (e.g., DD Forms 350 and 1057).

(5) Automated versions of forms may be used for JOC if authorized.

(h) Distribution. A copy of all JOC orders must be sent to the contracting office appointing ordering officers, the Finance and Accounting Office, the office or individual assigned responsibility for inspection and technical administration of the contract, and any appointed COR. The contracting officer must maintain the permanent record of each transaction.

Best Practice Job Order Contracting

5117.9005 Contract administration.

Contractor performance evaluations must be prepared for all orders of $100,000 or more and submitted to the CCASS in accordance with 5136.201.

Best Practice Job Order Contracting

5117.9006 JOC ordering officers.

(a) Appointment. The appointment of a special “JOC ordering officer” is authorized, but is only required when the contracting officer will not be executing the task orders. Appointments of ordering officers under each JOC must be minimized. JOC ordering officers must be nominated by the Director of Public Works (or equivalent facilities engineering manager) and appointed by letter similar to that in 5153.303-2 (see 5101.602-2-92), tailored for JOC, signed by the contracting officer, and approved at a level above the contracting officer, or the chief of the contracting office.

Best Practice Job Order Contracting

(b) Training. All JOC ordering officers must receive specific training and orientation from the responsible contracting office. This training must cover policy and procedures for operation of JOC, including this AFARS coverage, and shall specifically address the ordering officer’s authority, limitations and responsibilities, to include ethics, conflict of interest, and potential pecuniary liabilities.

Best Practice Job Order Contracting

(c) Authorization and limitations.

(1) JOC ordering officers may sign task orders under JOC on behalf of the Government when authorized by their appointment letter and the terms of the contract, provided that the total value of the order is $100,000 or less and the value of any non-pre-priced item(s) does not exceed $2,500.

(2) JOC ordering officers may be authorized to sign task orders of greater value, but not to exceed the thresholds as specified in 10 U.S.C. 2805(c)(1), on behalf of the Government, if determined necessary to realize the benefits of JOC, provided that –

(i) adequate management controls are in place (e.g., contracting officer oversight);

(ii) adequate training is provided;

(iii) the contracting officer approves; and

(iv) the value of any non-pre-priced item(s) does not exceed $2,500. [AFARS Revision #15, dated February 17, 2005]

(3) May execute modifications to existing task orders provided that —

(i) the contracting officer specifically delegates this authority in the JOC ordering officer appointment letter (generally will include modifications under the Changes clause, Changed Site Conditions, etc.);

(ii) the amount of the modification does not exceed the ordering officer’s authority;

(iii) pricing is accomplished by using the unit price book; and

(iv) the total value of non-prepriced items under the order as modified does not exceed the ordering officer’s authority.

(4) If applicable, numbers for modifications shall be obtained from the contracting officer. Copies of all modifications shall be immediately provided to the contracting officer for reporting. Modifications effecting changes to termination actions, or work suspensions, shall be executed by the contracting officer because of legal consideration issues and the potential fiscal issues involved.

Best Practice Job Order Contracting

(d) Responsibilities. JOC ordering officers —

(1) Are responsible for ensuring that all proposed JOC project descriptions and task orders express the Government’s actual requirements, validated in accordance with command and installation procedures, in a professional and understandable manner;

(2) Must ensure that an IGE, for orders $100,000 or more, is prepared prior to evaluating the contractor’s proposal;

(3) Must ensure that adequate and proper funds are available for the project prior to issuing an order;

(4) Must notify the contracting officer of any additional bonding requirements associated with new orders or changes in the value of existing orders;

(5) As the principal point of contact for technical and engineering issues, must respond to requests for technical clarification from the JOC contractor, documenting both the request and the response, and conduct the joint pre-proposal site survey, assuring that the contractor is provided access to all required facilities, plans, and other documents required for full knowledge of the scope and conditions of the required job;

(6) May evaluate contractor proposals; compare them with the IGE; negotiate scope of work, quantities, and performance period for pre-priced and non-pre-priced tasks; and may negotiate price on non-pre-priced tasks valued at $2,500 or less for orders within the JOC ordering officer’s signature authority;

(7) For orders estimated to exceed the JOC ordering officer’s signature authority, the JOC ordering officer must generally be responsible for evaluation of contractor proposals for proposed orders and may be authorized to solicit such proposals and clarify and negotiate units and quantities of pre-priced tasks; and must assist the contracting officer, as requested, in negotiations and resolution of variances between the IGE and the contractor’s proposal;

(8) Must be responsible for maintaining complete contract file documentation for each order and modification executed, including a record of all related correspondence and actions taken prior to award of the order and in the order administration phase;

(9) Must be responsible, with the Director of Public Works, for assisting the contracting officer in technical monitoring of the contractor’s performance of orders issued under JOC to include —

(i) Monitoring compliance with the SOW and schedule;

(ii) Contractor or supplier compliance with the clause at FAR 52.225-5, Trade Agreements (Apr 2000);

(iii) Wage Rate Requirements (Construction) statute compliance;

(iv) Assessment and validation of percentage of completion for progress payment purposes;

(v) Recommendations to the contracting officer for changes to existing orders, beyond the ordering officer’s authority;

(vi) Documenting and quickly reporting to the contracting officer systemic or recurring problems in contractor performance;

(vii) Prioritization of orders when required (in coordination with the DPW and appropriate installation officials), provided no increase in cost is involved; and

(viii) Preparation of any JOC status reports required by command, installation, or DOC regulations or directives or as requested by OACSIM or HQDA;

(ix) The above includes preparation of, or input for, performance evaluation reports (see 5136.201);

(10) Must send the complete record file to the contracting officer upon completion, and keep for DPW files, additional copies of documents required for continuing DPW responsibility (e.g., as-built drawings and warranties); and

(11) Must identify and report to the DPW and the contracting officer any recurring or significant inaccuracies or omissions in the task specifications of the Unit Price Book contained in the job order solicitation or JOC and propose needed changes.

Best Practice Job Order Contracting

5117.9007 Contracting officer responsibilities.

(a) The contracting officer is the official ultimately responsible for management of all aspects of JOC, including the actions of any JOC ordering officer, COR, and member of the DPW staff who is carrying out functional oversight responsibilities related to JOC administration.

(b) The contracting officer must issue orders under JOC, and modifications to such orders, which a JOC ordering officer is not authorized to execute. In general, all orders exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold or involving non-pre-priced tasks exceeding $2,500 must be executed by a warranted contracting officer, but see 5117.9006(c)(2) for an exception.

(c) Only the contracting officer may exercise an option to extend, or issue any modification to, a job order contract (as opposed to an order under same).

(d) The JOC contracting officer must ensure that all orders and modifications to orders, together with significant supporting documentation issued outside the contracting office, are duly received, recorded, and reported and that such orders are regularly reviewed for completeness and compliance with AFARS and sound business practices. At least twice a year, the contracting officer must ensure that ordering officer files and procedures are reviewed and that a representative sampling of orders is selected for tracking from initiation of the requirement to final payment and close-out of the order.

Best Practice Job Order Contracting

5117.9008 Internal controls.

(a) The internal control program must include the following:

(1) Separation of duties and responsibilities to establish internal checks and balances.

(i) Project scoping and project quality assurance/acceptance activities will be kept separate. Individuals involved with project scoping and development as well as proposal negotiations with the contractor will not be the same individual responsible for monitoring quality assurance. The responsibility for recommending acceptance of completed work will remain with separate quality assurance personnel. Alternatives are acceptable; however, they must meet the intent of 5117.9008(a)(1).

(2) Clear assignment of responsibilities and authority throughout the JOC process.

(b) An internal control JOC action and documentation checklist, tailored to the needs of the command or installation shall be developed to assist personnel responsible for management of JOC. Activities may use those measures outlined in the Internal Control and Review Plan, Appendix D of the JOC Guide to supplement existing internal control plans.

This page last modified 06/21/2016 16:00:09

Best Practice Job Order Contracting

via www.4bt.us – Independent, Objective, and Best Value Job Order Contracting and Construction Costing Solutions

 

 

 

Subpart 5117.2 – Options 

5117.204 Contracts.

(e) Principal assistant responsible for contracting may approve use of options that extend contracts beyond the five-year regulatory limit.

Best Practice Job Order Contracting

5117.206 Evaluation.

In awarding the basic contract, if a contracting officer determines that the Government is reasonably likely to exercise the option at FAR 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services, the contracting officer shall evaluate the price of the option as part of the source selection. The solicitation shall include the basis for evaluating the option price (see FAR 17.203(b)). If the contracting officer does not evaluate the option at FAR 52.217-8 at the time of award, but later decides to exercise the option, the contracting officer shall prepare a justification and approval (J&A) in accordance with FAR 6.303 prior to exercising the option (see FAR 17.207(f)).

Best Practice Job Order Contracting

5117.207 Exercise of options.

(c) In addition to the requirements at FAR 17.207(c) and DFARS 217.207(c), the contracting officer may exercise options only after determining, when applicable, that –

(i) Government performance monitors have used a written quality assurance surveillance plan to ensure that services and supplies conform to contractual requirements (see FAR 37.603, 37.604, 46.102 and 46.401);

(ii) The contracting officer has appointed a properly trained contracting officer’s representative for the contract or task order, or has documented the file to support retention of surveillance duties by the contracting officer (see DFARS PGI 201.602-2);

(iii) The contracting officer has verified registration in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System of the contract or task order for the current period (see FAR 42.1502, DFARS 242.1502, and 5142.1502), and that the assessing official will complete the final report within 120 days following the end of the current performance period; and

(iv) There are monthly surveillance reports in the Virtual Contracting Enterprise Contracting Officer’s Representative Module, along with necessary corrective actions.

5117.290 Addition of option clause or quantities to contracts after award.

Contracting officers shall obtain prior approval in accordance with FAR 6.304 before modifying a contract to incorporate option clauses or additional option quantities after award. Justifications shall include the reason for the proposed modification and the potential impact of disapproval.

Best Practice Job Order Contracting

Subpart 5117.5 – Interagency Acquisitions

5117.502 Procedures.

5117.502-1 General.

(a) Determination of best procurement approach.

(i) The requiring activity is responsible for making the determination required by FAR 17.502-1(a). A Government official who is of a grade not lower than O-6 or GS-15 and is assigned to the requiring activity approves the determination. The requiring activity obtains prior concurrence of the determination in accordance with paragraph (a)(ii) of this subsection.

(ii) The following officials from the requiring activity’s responsible contracting office shall concur with the determination of best procurement approach prior to public announcement of the requirement:

(A) For acquisitions valued at or above the simplified acquisition threshold, but less than $50 million, the head of the contracting activity (HCA), delegable no lower than two levels below the principal assistant responsible for contracting (PARC).

(B) For acquisitions valued at or above $50 million but less than $250 million, the HCA, delegable no lower than one level below the PARC.

(C) For acquisitions valued at or above $250 million but less than $1 billion, the HCA, delegable no lower than the PARC.

(D) For acquisitions valued at $1 billion and above for services, the Senior Services Manager without delegation.

(E) For acquisitions valued at $1 billion and above for supplies, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Procurement) without delegation.

(iii) If the proposed acquisition meets the requirements for a written acquisition plan, the contracting officer should attach the determination of best procurement approach to the acquisition plan for concurrent approval when routing the acquisition plan for coordination and approval.

(iv) If the approving official approves a determination of best procurement approach at the blanket purchase agreement level, individual calls against the agreement do not require separate determinations.

(b) Written agreement on responsibility for management and administration.

(1) Use the DD Form 448, Military Interdepartmental Purchase Request (MIPR) as Part B of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) model interagency agreement. If a non-DoD agency is unable to accept a MIPR for part B, use the Part B provided in the OFPP model interagency agreement.

(c) Business-case analysis requirements for multi-agency contracts and governmentwide acquisition contracts. For guidance on business-case analysis, see FAR 17.502-1(c). Submit the business case to the Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Procurement) at the email address listed in 5101.290(b)(2)(ii)(A).

(i) Cover letter. The PARC shall sign the cover letter, recommending the business case for approval. The letter must indicate whether there is any Congressional interest in the procurement.

(ii) Business case review document. The business case review document shall include the signatures of the preparer, contracting officer, technical representative, requirements representative, program manager, program executive officer, legal counsel, and PARC.

(iii) Business case. Use the format provided at FAR 17.502-1(c). Include the command control number on the upper right hand corner of every page of the business case, including the review document and approval page, to enable the reassembling of the business case analysis if the documents become separated.

(iv) Approval page. Submit the approval language as the last page of the business case on a plain page, not letterhead.

5117.502-2 The Economy Act.

(a) Assisted acquisitions that are subject to the Economy Act shall comply with:

(i) DoD Financial Management Regulation DoD 7000.14-R, Vol 11A Chapter 3 and

(ii) DFAS-IN Regulation 37-1, Chapter 12.

(c) The requiring activity is responsible for preparing the Economy Act determination and findings (D&F). Approval of the D&F is in accordance with DFAS-IN Regulation 37-1, Chapter 12. The Economy Act D&F is required for both direct and assisted acquisitions, in addition to the determination of best procurement approach.

Subpart 5117.7 – Interagency Acquisitions: Acquisitions by Nondefense Agencies on Behalf of the Department of Defense

5117.770 Procedures.

Follow the procedures at FAR 17.5, DFARS 217.5, DFARS 217.7, and 5117.5 for acquisitions by nondefense agencies on behalf of the Department of Defense.

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
March 27, 2017March 27, 2017Commercial Construction Cost Estimator, Uncategorized

Commercial Construction Cost Estimator – Unit Price Estimating

Being a good commercial construction cost estimator requires years of experience in the field as well as estimating at a line item level.

A detailed line item unit price book also greatly aids in improving productivity, sharing information, and minimizing errors and omissions.

Here are some considerations whether purchasing, buildings, or improving upon a detailed line item Unit Price Book.

UPB Application/Use – Specific Considerations for a Commercial Construction Cost Estimator

  1. Demolition: Separate line item costs should be included for demolition as appropriate. From an organizational perspective it’s a good practice to consistently group demolition line items together.  For example, place all demolition line items for a particular section (CSI Masterformat) as the beginning of each section.   Do not bundle remove and replace into one single line item as there are too many variations involved in removal to account for all instances and/or site conditions.
  2. Line Item versus Assemblies Pricing:  A unit price line item can represent an elemental line item, such as dig a hole for a wooden fence post feet deep, or a task such as install a wooden fence post three feet deep, inclusive of material, labor, and equipment cost.  The task may include separate line items for hand dug and power auger.   An assembly would be install a wooden fence, post and rail, via a specific type and material, etc.  and priced on a linear foot basis.
  3. Minimum labor/equipment or set-up charges:  For projects where the calculated labor/equipment total cost the work task is less than the minimum charge (if one is provided in the UPB), establishing a minimum labor/equipment and/or set-up charge may be beneficial.
  4. Minimum / Maximum Cost line items:   It may be beneficial for appropriate work tasks to provide a range of pricing from “low” to “high”, based upon quantity, location, work complexity, amount of size of work, etc.
  5. Location Factors / Cost Indexes:  The practice of using a “national average” unit price cost book(s) and localization factors and/or cost indexes is NOT RECOMMENDED.  The use of factors can significantly contribute to gross errors in construction cost estimates.  Line item cost books should, whenever possible, be locally researched for labor, material, and equipment.  The increased cost of a locally researched and current unit price book can easily be justified by a single poor estimate for a larger construction project induced by using national average pricing.Commercial Construction Cost Estimator
  6. JOC Unit Price Books:  When used for job order contracting, costs reflected should be “bare costs” and therefore NOT INCLUDE contractor overhead and profit, unless explicitly defined otherwise within the Job Order Contract.   JOC’s in general use bare costs as an accepted industry “best practice”.
  7. Labor Rates: Prevailing wage rates for all relevant construction trades should be used.  If work involved Federally funded worked, the specific requirement is Davis-Bacon Wage Rates.   Many other public entities have also begin to require Davis-Bacon Wage Rates.   That said, it is important to recognize that not all cost data vendors research and provide Davis-Bacon or prevailing wage rates in the same manner.  Ask your cost data vendor SPECIFICALLY how the labor data is researched and applied FOR YOUR SPECIFIC AREA and type of work.    There can be significant errors in labor costs and how associated crews are composed even within the most popular source(s) of commercial construction cost data.   As labor, on average account for 60% of construction costs, labor research techniques must be carefully evaluated.
  8. Granularity:  To be of value to a Commercial Construction Cost Estimator, prices in a UPB should be complete and for in-place construction unless explicitly described otherwise. Incidental fasteners (nails, screws, weldments, adhesives or other connectors), incidental options/accessories, and small tools required for a normal installation are included in the line item cost unless the line item description specifically states otherwise. Line item prices include all work required to result in the end finish specified in the line item unless the line item description specifically states otherwise. Equipment costs include normal operating expendables and servicing including routine parts.  All line item prices are valid to perform the work described to a height up to a specified height above finished floor or grade level unless the line item description specifically states otherwise.  Testing, adjusting, balancing and start-up of installed equipment (normal commissioning) and up to four hours of familiarization training for operation and maintenance of that equipment, is included unless the line item description specifically states otherwise.
  9. Scaffolding/lifts, Staging, etc: Associated costs should be allocated on a Task Order basis (per job), not per subcontractor or discipline.

Are you are Commercial Construction Cost Estimator  looking to build or improve upon your unit price cost database?   Learn more…

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
March 27, 2017Uncategorized

Writing a Job Order Contract Task Order

Writing a Job Order Contract Task Order JWriting a Job Order Contract Task Order

There are basically two methods to consider when writing a Job Order Contract Task Order:

#1 Completely design the project with either Owner in-house assets or a separate A/E indefinite delivery contract prior to giving it to the JOC contractor.

#2 Develop a more generalized scope of work without full A/E requirements, but with sufficient detail (potentially including an internal line item cost estimate) to enable the awarded JOC construction contractor to create an accurate and detailed construction cost estimate.

After identifying requirements for the required project, critical items are stated, paying attention to the all performance requirements.

Once the site visit is made, the scope is further developed by including the detail and specific requirements discussed.

The scope is further developed during and upon completion of the negotiation/scope clarification meetings.

The final scope is a mutually developed scope of work between the owner and the contractor.

The JOC process puts the responsibility of performance on the contractor while reducing the owner manpower requirement, however, the amount of early and ongoing communications and collaboration is significantly increased versus traditional construction delivery methods.

The owner clearly defines to  the contractor what is required and the contractor develops how it will be done.  

Any rationale for changes to the scope are documented until the final negotiations and subsequent job order contract task order is issued.

Writing a Job Order Contract Task Order – Sample:

The following sample is provided to assist in Writing a Job Order Contract Task Order.   It is intended to generally show the development and refinement of the scope of work through the entire task order process.

  1. The original requirement is verified and clarified with the user, resulting in the initial scope of work requirements. Example follows:

 

Install suspended ceilings in rooms A and B as indicated in the drawing below.

 

 

  1. During the site visit the following issues were recognized:
  2. The existing incandescent lighting needs to be demolished and install new fluorescent lighting in the suspended ceiling system.
  3. It’s recommended by the contractor to install fiberglass batt insulation at the roof deck.

 

The revised scope of work would then be as follows:

Remove the existing incandescent lighting, and install fiberglass batt insulation at the roof deck. Install suspended ceiling and troffer lighting in rooms A and B as indicated in the drawing below.

Writing a Job Order Contract Task Order

 

 

  1. During the negotiations the following issues were decided:
  2. All of the new fluorescent fixtures are to be 4 tube troffer type fluorescent fixtures. Two of the new fixtures are to have emergency battery backup.
  3. The insulation is to be Kraft faced R19 fiberglass insulation.
  4. Suspended ceiling will be 8 feet above finished floor.

 

 

The final scope of work would then be as follows:

Remove the existing incandescent lighting and install Kraft faced R19 fiberglass batt insulation at the roof deck. Install suspended ceiling and 4 tube fluorescent troffer fixtures in rooms A and B as indicated in the drawing below. One lighting fixture in each room shall have emergency battery backups. The new ceiling height shall be 8 feet above finished floor.

Writing a Job Order Contract Task Order

 

Note: Ceiling Height to be 8 feet above finished floor.

NOTE: This is only an example showing the nature of the scope development process. The  final scope of work should be detailed enough that both parties can agree to the requirements of the project at a line item level of detail using the approved JOC Unit Price Book.

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
March 22, 2017and Cloud Technology

Building Energy Efficiency, LEAN, and Cloud Technology

Building Energy Efficiency, LEAN, and Cloud Technology Improved Facilities Management Outcomes

According to the International Energy Agency, almost 30% of worldwide energy is attributable to buildings (40% of total in energy in the United States), and will increase 1.5%/year through 2040 to almost 50%.[1]  The United States is largest user of energy for commercial use. Building Energy Efficiency, LEAN, and Cloud Technology are central to improving facilities management outcomes.

The fastest growing energy consumer is the commercial building sector.   Commercial sector energy consumption form profit and nonprofit organizations is used primarily for heating and cooling systems, lights, refrigerators, computers, and other equipment in the buildings where businesses, institutions, and other organizations are located. Examples of commercial sector buildings include retail stores, office buildings, government buildings, restaurants, hotels, schools, hospitals, and leisure and recreational facilities. Non-building energy use is included in the commercial sector, where it contributes to public services such as traffic lights and water and sewer systems.

Building Energy Efficiency, LEAN, and Cloud Technology

 

 

The top five users of energy in the commercial sector are;

  1. Mercantile and service (15% of total energy consumed by commercial buildings)

Malls and stores, Car dealerships, Dry cleaners, Gas stations

  1. Office (14% of consumption)

Professional and government offices, Banks

  1. Education (10% of consumption)

Elementary, middle, and high school, Colleges

  1. Health care (8% of consumption)

Hospitals, Medical offices

  1. Lodging (6% of consumption)

Hotels, Dormitories, Nursing homes

Building Energy Efficiency, LEAN, and Cloud Technology

 

Together increased energy use is a parallel rise and CO2 emissions, leading to the urgent need to improve energy efficiency and make more sustainable the buildings.

 

The use of technology: IoT – Internet of Things; Life-cycle Facilities Management, LEAN Construction Delivery Methodologies, BIM – Building Information Modeling and the Cloud today allow to design, build and manage building smarter.

The ability to have real-time, current, and actionable information related to the need for and execution of sustainability renovation and repair projects, use of the energy consumed or what might be spared help to reduce energy costs in combination with CO2 emissions responsible for the greenhouse is a critical tool.

The energy manager and facilities management team is responsible for the proper use and energy management.   They are tasked with eliminating waste through the data analysis, the identification of critical issues and implementation of LEAN best management practices at reducing energy consumption, and cost associate with associated tasks.

The implementation of ICT – Information and Communication Technology – can contribute significantly to improving the quality of the overall performance of buildings in terms of greater energy efficiency without decreasing the quality of living.

Building in the Cloud provides to the Owners and the Facility managers tools control and Energy’s monitoring costs for buildings or groups of buildings, by providing analytical tools for the management and evaluation of possible interventions to improve the structures or the equipment.

Building Energy Efficiency, LEAN, and Cloud Technology

 

Building in Cloud also has a module for LEAN Construction Delivery implementation, including locally researched construction line item costs.

Building in the Cloud is an innovative service to create, share and manage all the information of a building.

The service is accessible via any standard web browser, regardless of any device type (PC, Tablet or Smartphone) without the need for any installation, by simply logging in.

By registering with the site you can use Building in Cloud without cost for one month; beyond which you can decide if you wish to continue to continue our use for as low as $26.90/Mo. for each concurrent user (unlimited number of named users).  No credit card information is required for the free trial!

Try Building in Cloud now for free.

 

[1] https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/ieo/world.cfm – INTERNATIONAL ENERGY OUTLOOK 2016

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
March 22, 2017JOC Program Guide

JOC Program Guide

The JOC Program Guide provides a framework for organizations considering, or in the process of implementing or executing a Job Order Contract.

JOC Program Guide

If you are interested in the  detailed processes and procedures for the execution and administration of JOC contracts following industry best management practices, please complete the below form.

JOC Program Guide

JOC Program Guide TOC

FOREWARD.. 5

INTRODUCTION.. 6

Purpose. 6

History of Job Order Contracting (JOC) 7

Benefits of Job Order Contacting. 10

JOC Organization, Responsibilities, and Authorities. 12

JOC Implementation Considerations. 14

Strategic Evaluation of Objectives, Goals, and Appropriateness. 15

JOB ORDER CONTRACT ACQUISITION/PROCUREMENT STRATEGY. 16

Facility Management/Engineering Planning. 19

The JOC Unit Price Book. 19

Technical Specifications. 21

Statement of Work for the Job Order Contract 21

Economic Price Adjustments. 21

Environmental Coordination. 22

Technical / Document Library. 22

Source Selection Team.. 22

Selection Evaluation Plan. 23

Pre-award Activities. 23

Contractor Phase-In Plan. 24

Contractor Phase-Out Plan. 24

Pre-RFP Review.. 25

Contract Funding. 25

Preproposal Conference. 25

Proposal Evaluation. 26

Competitive Range. 26

Preaward Survey. 26

Evaluation of Contractor Performance. 27

Negotiations and Source Selection. 27

Debriefing Unsuccessful Offerors. 27

Staffing. 27

Facilities. 28

Preaward Activities. 28

Sample JOB ORDER CONTRACT SOP – Standard Operating Procedure – Operations Manual – Execution Manual 28

Sample  – Job Order Contracting Internal Control Checklist 31

JOC Procurement/Award Process. 32

Identification of Participants. 33

Limitations. 33

WORK EXECUTION AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.. 34

Contract Clauses. 35

Subcontracting Plan Regarding Small, Small Disadvantaged and Women-Owned Small Business  36

Job Order Execution. 36

Initiating and Reviewing Job Orders. 36

In-House or Contract Performance. 36

Methods of Contracting. 37

Job Order Contracting. 37

Job Order / Task Order Routing. 38

Assignment of a Project Manager. 38

Scope Validation Meeting. 39

Request for Contractor’s Proposal 39

Proposal Preparation. 40

Independent Owner Estimate Preparation. 40

Protection of Owner Estimate. 41

Evaluate Contractor’s Proposal 41

Negotiation of Job Order / Task Order. 42

Job Order / Task Order Award Package Preparation. 43

Placing the Order. 44

Preconstruction Meeting. 44

Administrative Responsibilities. 45

Non-Prepriced Items. 45

Contractor Performance. 46

Significant Events. 46

Task Order Close Out 47

Payroll Review.. 47

Timely Accomplishment of Requirements. 47

Contract Status Report 48

Bonding. 48

Payments. 48

Small Business Utilization Reporting. 49

Quality Assurance/Quality Control 49

Task Order Modifications. 50

Changes to T.O. Requirements. 51

FISCAL YEAR-END PLANNING.. 51

Execution of Task Orders Against the Guaranteed Minimum.. 51

Execution of Task Orders Issued After Guaranteed Minimum.. 51

ADDTIONAL ENGINEERING/TECHNICAL/DPW RESPONSIBILITIES. 53

Citation of Funds. 53

Task Order Status Report 53

Exercising Options. 54

FOLLOW-ON CONTRACTING FOR A NEW CONTRACT. 54

APPENDIX. 55

UNDERSTANDING THE CONTRACTOR’S COEFFICIENT. 55

ROLE OF JOC ADMINSTRATOR. 56

INTERNAL CONTROL AND REVIEW PLAN. 57

Job Order Contracting Internal Control Checklist 58

SAMPLE SCOPE OF WORK. 60

SAMPLE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. 62

SAMPLE CONTRACTOR’S PROPOSAL. 63

SAMPLE INDEPENDENT OWNER/GOVERNMENT ESTIMATE. 69

TAKE OFF NOTES: 69

COST ESTIMATE. 70

TASK ORDER FILE CHECKLIST. 74

QUALITY CONTROL PLAN REQUIREMENTS. 76

JOB ORDER CONTRACTING TRAINING. 78

ADDING NON-PREPRICED ITEMS TO YOUR JOC CONTRACTS. 80

ABBREVIATIONS. 82

DEFINITIONS. 85

References / White Papers  86

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
March 21, 2017March 22, 2017Job order contracting guide

Job Order Contracting Guide

Job Order Contracting Guide

A job order contracting guide is a required component of any best practice Job Order Contract.  Also referred to as a JOC Operations Manual, or JOC Execution Guide, the Job Order Contracting Guide is a written document that contains all of the strategic and operational elements and requirements associated with the JOC Program.   An example of the some of the topic areas is shown below.

The Job Order Contract and is integral Job Order Contracting Guide should reflect current, objective, and transparent collaborative best management practices.  LEAN construction methodology with a focus upon win-win long terms relationships, outcomes, and best value should be founding principles.

General areas that to be considered when preparing a Job Order Contracting Guide include:

  • Post completion meetings to determine success of project and lessons learned
  • Standard process for requesting, accepting, and managing new requests for JOC renovation, repair, construction projects.
  • Project Management best practices are implemented and standardized across the organization and awarded JOC contractors.
  • Project requests scheduled based on impact to organization/urgency
  • Ability to do demand planning and forecasting
  • Ability to perform “what-if” scenarios
  • Risk (access, site conditions, capability) information associated with project plans
  • Standardized process for facility user, contractor, and owner/manager input and communication
  • Pre-defined corrective actions for possible exceptions
  • Roles and resources  allocated during the proposal phase
  • Standardized process for selecting projects and optimizing building portfolio
  • Required skills are mapped to project resources
  • Ability to collaborate in real-time with others
  • Cloud system enabling users to comment, question, tag, note, and share specific items and business events in real-time
  • Project estimates export to PDF/Excel
  • Decision-makers real-time access
  • Automated email alerts when tasks are due or assigned
  • Project/task templates
  • Best practices embedded in softwa
  • Certified Project Managers and all system users (internal and external)
  • Formal and ongoing training for all participants (owners, facilities management, contractors, procurement)
  • Internal and external JOC marketing
  • Regular third party independent audits
  • Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
  • Owner leadership and competence
  • Defined system access levels
  • Defined workflows
  • Assurance that JOC consultants are properly distanced from decision-making, especially if their compensation is based upon a percentage of construction work
  • Method to improve skillsets by developing knowledge capture process and transfer of knowledge from experienced practitioners to new staff
  • Ability of all participants to suggest and contribute suggested improvements.
  • Centralized location for project and communication materials and content, with distributed access
  • Locally researched line item Unit Price Book
  • Global oversight and leadership without excessive management and control that is supportive and enables the leverage of local capability and expertise.
  • Version control for materials
  • Ability to comment on and edit materials/information and content in real-time
  • Customer satisfaction and other performance metrics are monitored and measured
  • Standard performance metrics are leveraged to assess JOC Program health
  • Cost impacts and revenue potential (contractor) assessed before accepting or approving programs, projects
  • Past performance of projects is referenced when making decisions
  • Continuously monitor value of in-process projects to approve / continue projects
  • Ability to quantify an individual team member’s contributions to project success

Request SAMPLE Job Order Contracting Guide

Job Order Contracting Guide

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
March 21, 2017March 21, 2017Construction Cost Estimator

Construction Cost Estimator – Line Item

Construction Cost Estimator – Line Item


A  superior line item construction cost estimator generally has an intricate knowledge of field construction techniques, uses a  common data environment, and is skilled at both collaboration and LEAN construction and/or facilities management.

Field construction knowledge –  Without knowing what types of crews are currently used  for drywall installation or asbestos removal, impacts of site conditions or security/access issues, etc., it’s virtually impossible to create an independent construction cost estimate and/or verify the estimates of subs / trades.

Common data environment –  Using CSI MasterFormat and an associated construction cost database with common descriptions, terms, and full detail as to labor, material, and equipment costs is the ONLY efficient way to build, maintain,  re-use, and share detailed line construction cost data.  An experienced construction cost estimator knows this, but is it is surprising how few estimators practice these techniques.    A unit price book and a common data architecture are critical to improving transparency and productivity.

Construction Cost Estimator

LEAN collaborative construction delivery methods – Job Order Contracting, JOC (for renovation, repair, and minor new construction( and Integrated Project Deliver, IPD (for major new construction) are proven LEAN construction delivery methods that are capable of consistently delivering over 90% of projects on-time, on-budget, and to everyone’s satisfaction.  That said, less than 5% of the AECOO market practices these methods, of fewer practice them appropriately.   If one looks at the ability of various market sectors to understand and deploy JOC, for example, hears a ranking of best to worst…

  1. DOD
  2. Higher Education
  3. Transportation (Airports/Mass Transit)
  4. State Government and/or K12 Education

All detailed costs associated with a renovation, repair, maintenance, or new construction project must be addressed and mutually understood. While this appears obvious, it is rarely the case for across Architects, Engineers, Contractors, Owners, and Facility Managers/Operators.

The fact that Real Property Owners, Architects, Engineers, Contractors, Facility Managers, and Users rarely share and understand detailed task descriptions and costs is a major factor contributing to industry-wide low productivity, rampant waste, and overall poor outcomes.

Owners are ultimately responsible for their built structures.. their quality and condition, ability to support the organizational mission,  and life-cycle costs.  The use of detailed line item unit costs significantly helps to communicate information among all project participants, beneficiaries, and oversight groups as well as focus attention upon specific requirements and intended outcomes. The use of unit cost methodology promotes and requires responsibility and accountability for decisions throughout the project life-cycle.

 

Benefits of Unit Cost Line Item Estimating

  • Total Cost Visibility/Awareness
  • More Efficient Allocation of Resources
  • Improved Best Value Decision-making
  • Fewer Errors and/or Omissions

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
March 20, 2017LEAN Construction Institute

LEAN Construction Institute

Every architecture, engineering, and construction management and/or facilities management school would benefit themselves and the AECOO industry by having LEAN Construction Institute.   (AECOO = Architecture, Engineering, Construction ,Operations, Owner)

The only path towards improved renovation, repair, and new construction outcomes, on a consistent basis, is the implementation of LEAN collaborative construction delivery methodology.

 

Until Owners and Facilities Management improves their leadership skills and overall competency with respect to life-cycle management of the built environment, waste and low productivity will remain rampant in the construction sector.

LEAN Construction Institute

Job Order Contracting, Integrated Project Delivery and other collaborative processes should be featured at the LEAN Construction Institute.

Collaborative LEAN construction delivery methods shared the following characteristics:

  • Collaboration
  • Mutual Respect & Trust
  • Financial Transparency
  • Owner Leadership without excessive management & control
  • Shared Risk/Reward
  • Best Value Procurement
  • Common Standard Terms, Definitions, & Data Architectures (UNIFORMAT, MASTERFORMAT, OMNICLASS)
  • Continuous Education, Training, & Improvement
  • Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) / Audits
  • Written Execution and/or Operations Manuals (Roles, Responsibilities, Deliverables, Workflows / Standardized Work Processes, Reporting Requirements…) as a Contractual Component

LEAN construction drives early and ongoing information sharing across multiple knowledge domains.

 

The systemic productivity problems associated to the AECOO sector are traceable to archaic, ad hoc, and antagonistic construction delivery methods….  all of which unfortunately have become part of our culture.

A primary focus upon education and change management is the only viable solution to reducing waste and improving productivity.. the the need for the LEAN Construction Institute.

Focus must shift from the prevalent “first cost mentality” to “life-cycle cost” planning. On average, only 20% of a built structures cost resides in initial construction.  Procurement must shift from “lowest bidder” to “best value”.

Real property owners and facility managers must take on leadership roles in terms of stewardship of the built environment.

Collaboration must be mandated.

 

[1] LEAN CONSTRUCTION DEFINED
LEAN construction is the adaptation and application of processes from LEAN manufacturing.  The latter is believed to have been was first implemented at Toyota Motor Company in Japan.  The implementation, known as the Toyota Production System (TPS) was specific to Toyota and has since evolved in multiple forms of “LEAN philosophy”.   LEAN is a collaborative business process with a focus upon team collaboration, early and ongoing information sharing, and continuous improvement. Minimizing waste, increasing value, and accepting input from all persons within an organization are the hallmarks of LEAN. LEAN, as a business process philosophy, has been successfully implemented via progressive construction delivery methods for over two decades (Integrated Project Delivery – IPD, and Job Order Contracting – JOC).

www.4BT.us – Independent, Objective, and Best-Value Job Order Contracting LEAN Construction Delivery Solutions.

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
March 17, 2017March 17, 2017Cost Estimate in Construction

Cost Estimate in Construction

Creating a cost estimate in construction requires experience not only in estimating but in actual construction tasks.  Field experience on job sites is necessary in order to gain a full understanding of situational requirements.    I would even argue that a site visit should be mandatory in addition.

Preparing multiple reasonable detailed estimates efficiently as requires using a line item construction cost database.

There are “national average” cost database available. These are a reasonable starting point.  Using them exclusively, however, is not a recommended best practice.  They do not represent local labor, equipment, and material costs sufficiently.   The use of a national average cost database AND localization factors is also not a recommend best practice.  The application of localization factors at such a “gross” level introduces significant error.

Cost Estimate in Construction

A locally researched line item construction cost database (complete with labor, material, and equipment detail and organized via CSI MasterFormat) combined with the decades of experience of skilled construction cost estimator is the best past toward an detailed, accurate, and collaborative  cost estimate in construction.

Job Order Contracting,  a collaborative integrated project deliveyr method, required the use of unit price book (UPB) to create a cost Estimate in construction.    Best management practice required the use  locally researched detailed unit price construction cost data.

Four BT, LLC is an innovator in providing construction data, cloud technology, and services for Job Order Contracting and physical asset life-cycle / total cost of ownership management.  Our team of highly experienced and skilled professions is unsurpassed in the creation of construction cost data and life-cycle management from  concept through ongoing operations.       Our team members have provided services and solutions to the largest real property portfolio owners in America, as well as smaller facilities management organizations across all public and private sectors.  If you organization is looking to delivery more renovation, repair, and construction project on-time, on-budget, and to the statisfaction of all stakeholders, contact us today.

info@4BT.US

Cost Estimate in Construction

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
March 15, 2017Job Order Contracting Events, Uncategorized

Job Order Contracting Events – Center for Job Order Contracting Excellence Meeting

 

Job Order Contracting Events… The Mid-Atlantic Chapter of the Center for Job Order Contracting Excellence (CJE) is seeking Facility Managers, Client Procurement personnel, Owner Management personnel, and Contractor participation in the Mid-Atlantic Chapter; and on the Mid-Atlantic Council Board.

CJE Membership and participation is open to public and private entities with a vested interest in JOC and IDIQ procurement and delivery.

 

The CJE is a non-profit organization created as the resource and collaboration center for education, best practices, research, and JOC Certification. We are seeking to build better JOC understanding, more transparency, increase data access and metrics, and maintain contract flexibility  while ensuring contractual compliance. JOC is a great contract to have in your tool box and across the industry, we want to retain the strengths of speed and flexibility, add controls to increase clarity and transparency, and house data matrices that enable Contract Owners to measure and monitor multi-location and multi-agency use under the single procurement tool.

Job Order Contracting Events

CJE Job Order Contracting Events have personnel available to discuss typical JOC issues, FAQ’s on differing types of IDIQ contracts, custom JOC potentials, availability and veracity of differing Unit Price Books, and pricing methods and mechanics. An open forum / panel discussion period is in the making for the Spring meeting; participants desired.

 

The next Mid-Atlantic CJE Chapter meeting is March 23 2017 in Falls Church, VA – no fees, lunch included! HITT Contracting is hosting this year’s event, please contact me go to https://jocexcellence.org/ and learn more about the CJE.

 

 

 

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
March 14, 2017March 14, 2017and satisfaction

Integrated project delivery method

An integrated project delivery method is arguably required in order to achieve desired quality, satisfaction, timing, and cost for over 90% of renovation, repair, or new construction projects executed. Traditional design-bid-build, and even design-build are not capable of meeting this threshold, not providing appropriate levels of collaboration and financial transparency.

Job Order Contracting, JOC,  is an integrated project delivery method design specifically for renovation, repair, and minor new construction.   It provide multiple benefits to all participants and stakeholders.  These benefits are largely derived through the use of a common data environment, CDE, which dramatically improves communication and collaboration throughout the project life-cycle.

Integrated project delivery method

A Common Data Environment (CDE) is a strategic tool for sharing cost information and managing a team.

The JOC LEAN Integrated Project Delivery Method  as well as, Integrated Project Delivery, IPD, and BIM, are dependent upon a CDE to drive collaboration and minimize error, omissions, and miscommunication.

 A detailed, full transparent line item construction cost estimate is critical for  improving collaboration and reducing change orders.  

An Example… CDE and LEAN JOC Construction Delivery

A role of a common data environment within a JOC integrated project delivery method is to provide actionable information in support of renovation, repair, and minor new construction.   Real property owners, contractors, engineers, and architects are familiar with obtaining project task and cost information from a variety of sources, including published cost data (example: R.S. Means Company, LLC), vendor quotes from general and trade contractors, and historical cost records.

Within a Job Order Contract integrated project delivery method, the Common Data Environment is provided by the Unit Price Book, UPB.   The JOC unit price book is used by owners and contractors to define and cost construction tasks required for each renovation, repair, and minor new construction project.    All construction tasks are organized within a standard data architecture, such as CSI MasterFormat.

Unit Price Books – Pros and Cons

Research shows that only 2% of construction projects globally are delivered on-time, on-budget, and to the satisfaction of all participants and users.[1]  To flip this traditionally negative outcome upside down, and consistently drive 98% satisfaction levels requires that timely and accurate information be shared transparently and as quickly as possible, without interruption, throughout all asset life-cycle activities.

Construction cost data must be in clear, common terms, which can be aggregated, distributed, updated and modified for all the varied participants, purposes and goals.    This information is can only be cost effectively created, stored, and maintained within a CDE.  At detailed line item level, an example being the CSI Masterformat data architecture.

The core objective of line item construction cost data is to provide better information, knowledge and wisdom to allow us to make better decisions, and drive higher efficiency.  No one wants to change their work process needlessly, fill out the same information multiple times,  waste time searching for information,  or pay for new technologies where claimed benefits are not clearly defined.

Making the necessary changes within an organization to adopt common data architectures and collaborative work practices is nontrivial. Thus LEAN construction delivery methods such as Job Order Contracting, that can provide major benefits to all participants, are not always well received nor well implemented.   New processes naturally lead to higher initial business costs, and requires both an associated learning curve, and specific supporting cultures.    Thus, there is an acceptance barrier by many owners, contractors, and AEs when it comes to collaborative methods such as Job Order Contracting or Integrated Project Delivery.

Clearly organizations will not shift to requiring a Common Data Environment until overall investment costs in technology and training, and associated benefits can be quantified.   That time, however, is now. Objective, best value, and timely line item construction cost data is available.  Supporting training and technology is also readily obtainable.   There is little reason not to improve productivity for renovation, repair, and construction projects.     The world of construction is changing, and those that don’t take the path of innovation will be left behind.

Integrated project delivery method

CDE Players

Introducing the Common Data Environment impacts multiple players within the construction value chain:

“The Owner”
All real property owners who manage renovation, repair, maintenance or new construction projects need a Common Data Environment to develop, store, and distribute all relevant drawings, BIM models, documents, activities, and processes to all the relevant stakeholders.

Owners are becoming increasingly focused on demanding more value. They are aware of the traditional waste and productivity issues and are beginning to demand change.

Technology that embeds LEAN collaborative best management practices for the design and construction industry is available to manage an enormously wide range of complex data, and at the same time, is relatively simple deploy and to use.

Building Information Modeling software-solutions, including CAFM (computer-aided facility management for space planning), CMMS (computerized maintenance management software for routine maintenance under $10,000), CPMS (capital planning and management software for physical and functional condition assessment and reinvestment planning/decision-support, LEAN Product Delivery software (Job order contracting and integrated project delivery),  and 3D visualization tools can jointly deliver benefits to stakeholders throughout every part of the construction and life-cycle management process.
“The Designer”
A high level of pressure will be put on architects and other specialist advisors as many clients currently see 3D visualization as the answer to ensuring cost effective construction project delivery.  This, of course, must change to BIM.   Developing a CDE to run and record the processes between you and your clients that includes all aspects of life-cycle management, especially that of collaborative LEAN project delivery will become mandatory.  The designer needs to manage ongoing changes in real time as situations require, and be sure that the document available is current, and all prior changes archived.

Sharing the same information, in appropriate formats, with the Owner with the structural and MEP Engineers is critical for validation of work scope and minimizing errors, omissions, and miscommunications. The later are all result costly, yet largely avoidable, changes during the construction stage.

“The Contractor”
Within a BIM execution, the constructor is active part of the proceedings from the earliest planning stages. This enables inclusion of their since their proven field experience and knowledge.   This is critical to meeting objectives for quality, timeliness and cost.  All stakeholders must offer their contribution and their experience as early as possible.

The importance of using a LEAN construction delivery method can’t be overstated.  Regardless of the LEAN construction delivery method selected, all require early and ongoing collaboration among project participants.

The traditional and problematic “transition between the design phase and the construction phase” is eliminated from an informational perspective within a LEAN construction/BIM process.   The builder will already have all the information needed to complete the work per standards and specifications required by the Owner.

Finally, complementing and adding the information is in the life-cycle physical asset model is simplified using a CDE.  This factor is indispensable in the during the operations management and maintenance phases.
“The Facility Manager”
The Facility Manager as well as the Energy Manager, and related colleagues, can depend upon a CDE to assure available access to historical, current, and planned  operations and maintenance management activities, costs, and impacts.

Within the CDE, a wide range of standardized information can be stored and immediately accessed: locations, buildings, horizontal infrastructure, movable assets (equipment, furniture), major building systems, major equipment, and people (internal, and external).   This information is always immediately directly available in the office or in the field.

Real time maintenance management activities can be costed, scheduled, and tracked on demand.

If the information comes from a building information model (see example figure) inside the CDE you may store additional information such as warranty information, building plans, permits, conformity certificates, data sheets, etc…  This information allows the operator to increase the utilization of all available resources, while reducing risk and avoidable delays.  Space use and energy efficiency can also be monitored locally and enterprise-wide.

 

In Summary
The AECOO industry (Architects, Engineers, Contractors, Owners, and Operators) and associated supply chain participants would be well served to leverage the appropriate integrated project delivery method and its associated Common Data Environment to allow for access of current, standardized and easily understood, and detailed information across all stages of the life-cycle of a built structure.

 

[1] McKinsey Study

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
March 14, 2017Lean construction techniques

Lean construction techniques

Lean construction techniques are central to improving quality, timeliness, satisfaction, and lowering costs.

LEAN Construction Techniques

 

  1. Focus upon Outcomes
  2. Best Value procurement
  3. Outcomes and deliverables must be clearly defined, written, and measurable
  4. Owner must provide value by sharing knowledge and collaborating in a timely manner with all service providers from concept through close-out, and not engage in excessive management and control
  5. Owner and service provider(s) share risk and reward based upon aligned interests
  6. Information must be in a standardized format, timely, readily and shared
  7. Reward is performance-based

 

Traditional construction procurement methods and daily operations are unreliable.

Best Value Procurement and LEAN collaborative construction delivery methods are proven to delivery significant improvements.
Construction delivery processes must be structured to assure teamwork and continuous monitoring and improvement.

Participants must not only be competent, but share common goals as well as share risk and reward.

Focus must be upon outcomes, mission, and clients/customers.

LEAN CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY METHODS

Examples of proven LEAN collaborative construction delivery include Integrated Project Delivery, IPD, for major new construction, and Job Order Contracting, JOC, for renovation, repair, maintenance, sustainability, and minor new construction.

OWNER LEADERSHIP

Owner must demonstrate LEADERSHIP and require COLLABORATION and engage in innovation, agility, and performance improvement.

Owners must EMPOWER teams without excessive management and control.

Owners must assure essential capabilities and competencies are present throughout the TEAM.

White Papers

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
March 14, 2017JOC Construction Labor Costs

JOC Construction Labor Costs

JOC Construction Labor Costs

JOC construction labor costs provide the foundation for any successful Job Order Contracting Program.    On average, labor accounts for sixty percent (60%) of a project total construction cost and is therefore a primary consideration.

Most “best practice” Job Order Contracts use prevailing wage rates, and more specifically Davis-Bacon wage rages if available.    The wage rates are combined with material and equipment costs, and the time/crew required to perform a specified task in order to create a detailed JOC construction cost task or line item.    The total for the line item is general the applied without contractor overhead and profit.  The latter are accounted for by the job order contractor’s coefficient(s)  as approved for the related Job Order Contract.

JOC Construction Labor CostsJOC Construction Labor Costs

The listing of tasks for a Job Order Contract are contained within the JOC Unit Price Book (UPB).  The UPB is generally updated annually to account for market fluctuations and the adding of any new unit price line items as required.

Historically, cost data from The R.S. Means Company, LLC has been used for the majority of Job Order Contracts.   There are now independent, objective, and in some cases more suitable alternatives such as the 4BT JOC Unit Price Book.

Key considerations for a JOC Unit Price Book:

  • Appropriate use of prevailing wage rates / Davis-Bacon Wage Rates (Note:  4BT painstakingly researches labor rates and provides unsurpassed granularity and accuracy in this regard.)
  • Bare costs (no contractor overhead and profit)
  • Locally researched cost information (The use of localization factors and/or “national average” costs is not recommended due to the likelihood of associated gross inaccuracies).
  • Provided by an objective and independent resource
  • Organized via CSI Masterformat
  • Use of line item modifiers (Line item modifiers add or deduct cost from an associated parent line item due to a variety of factors: quantity, site/location, etc.).  Modifiers, on average, impact a cost estimate by +/- 30% and are therefore a very important component of a UPB)
  • Appropriate number of line items (Most Job Order Contracts require fewer than 30,000 line items for common renovation, repair, and minor new construction tasks.  Some vendors market the use of hundreds of thousands of line items.  Excessive numbers of line items can actually increase JOC Program cost due to their maintenance and upkeep as well as confusion and errors.
  • Rapidly and securely accessible via a standard browser interface.

Learn more…

 

www.4BT.US – Independent, Objective, and Best Value Job Order Contracting Solutions

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
March 13, 2017March 13, 2017Construction Cost Estimate

Construction Cost Estimate – Independent, Objective, Job Order Contract Unit Price Book

Construction Cost Estimate – Key Factors

Construction Cost Estimate – A detailed Construction Cost Estimate must be represented in common terms using a standard data architecture (CSI Master Format), provide labor, material, and equipment breakdowns, and be researched locally (no using of localization factors or industry average values).

The 4BT OpenJOC Unit Price Book meets all these criteria, delivering an independent, objective, and best value industry resource for real property owners, contractors, architects, engineers, and county, state, and local governments.

4BT OpenJOC Unit Price Book, UPB and Cloud 4BT-CE JOC Software

 

HIGHLIGHTS

             Locally research line item construction costs – No Use of Localization Factors

             Descriptions in plain English

             Full material, equipment, and labor details

             Prevailing, current, accurate, and localized Davis-Bacon wage rates

             Independent, objective, and best value data source

             Guaranteed cost throughout the Job Order Contract term

Construction Cost Estimate
CLOUD Cost Estimating

The 4BT OpenJOC Unit Price Book is locally researched and provides a higher level of granularity/detail than so-called “North American standard” construction cost books.

Furthermore, the pricing of our cost data is guaranteed in future years as well as created and maintained by industry leading professionals formerly with the R.S. Means Company, LLC, and U.S. Cost, LLC.

Gain the confidence and get the support you deserve for you Job Order Contracting and other detailed unit price line item cost data requirements.

Our cost data is also available via a true cloud environment that runs on ANY major web browser…   and your access is fast, dependable, and secure.

You can also embed our cost data within your own construction cost estimating environment.

www.4BT.us – Independent, Objective, and Best Value LEAN Construction Solutions.

 

4BT JOC Unit Price Books are individually created to account for at least ninety percent (90%) of the renovation, repair, maintenance, and/or construction costs associated the associated Job Order Contract. While some unit price books contain hundreds of thousands of line items,  the most commonly associated with facilities and infrastructure involve far fewer line items in actual practice.   Excessive numbers of line items can create confusion and inefficiencies.

A 4BT Job Order Contract UPB  can vary in size, however, generally does not exceed approximately 60,000-unit price line  items/construction tasks.   Material, equipment, and labor detail are provided for commonly encountered renovation, repair, maintenance, construction tasks.

 

Pedigree

The pedigree of the 4BT Unit Price Book dates back, in part, to  some of the first early Army/DOD  Job Order Contracts deployed in the United States and subsequently have been refined by decades of research and field application.  Over one hundred (100) variations of custom unit price books have also been developed.

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
March 9, 2017March 9, 2017LEANconstruction

LEANconstruction

TOP 10 LEANCONSTRUCTION BASICS

The application of LEANconstruction is a focus upon best value for all project participants.

While some will argue that “Every situation is unique” and there is no standard application of LEAN construction, core characteristics are and requirements do exist.   In short, consistency in process deployment is critical and can easily live within an environment of continuous improvement.  LEAN construction processes are built to adapt based upon the competency and communication of participants.

The core aspects of LEANconstruction have been deployed for decades through collaborative construction delivery methods such as Integrated Project Delivery – IPD (for major new construction) and Job Order Contracting – JOC (for renovation, repair, maintenance, sustainability, and minor new construction).

leanconstruction
Core Aspects of LEANconstruction
1. Collaboration
2. Best value procurement and execution
3. Shared risk/reward
4. Continuous improvement
5. Key performance indicators – KPIs
6. Mutual respect
7. Ongoing education and training
8. Common terms, definitions, and data architectures
9. Technology that supports rather than dictates process
10. Focus upon outcomes

Owners must lead the LEAN construction process and do so without excessive management and control.  In order to lead, however, owners must first grasp and become “LEAN competent”.

Sign up for White Papers/Research…

Facilities Management Considerations
  • Develop competencies across all knowledge domains that support the organization, suppliers, and service providers
  • Create competitive advantage and best value through developing long-term partnerships
  • Engage in best value procurement
  • Segment “Fixed” and “Variable Costs”
  • Create a Capital Renewal Plan
    • Capital Renewal – Major repairs and cyclical replacement of building systems/components versus established building life-time (50 years, 100 years)
    • Sustainment Model (planned, preventive, and emergency maintenance, plus capital renewal) and Restoration/Modernization Models
  • Evaluate Current and Plan Status of Maintenance and Operations Program
  • Document cost savings via estimated return on investment (ROI) what-if analysis versus various timeframes
  • Review procurement policies
  • Review construction delivery methods
  • Ongoing education and training
  • Continuous monitoring inclusive of key leading and lagging performance indicators
  • Maintenance (General, Routine, Preventive)
    • Review operations affecting maintenance
    • Procedures
  • Utilities
    • Review operational procedures affecting utilities
    • Usage patterns/peak usage
    • Monitoring (meters, motors, etc.)
    • Life-cycle repair versus replace analysis
    • Review major systems (heat/light resistant glazing, insulation, automatic shut-offs for all fixtures, high efficiency heating/cooling, daylight lighting controls, intelligent building controls.
  • Capital Renewal
    • Regular condition audits
    • Prioritize versus organization mission
    • Multi-year scenario analysis
    • Repair versus replace analysis

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
March 9, 2017March 9, 2017Construction Repair Cost Estimator

Construction Repair Cost Estimator for Public Agencies

A Construction Repair Cost Estimator for Public Agencies is now available that is independent, objective, and cost-effective.    Forget out databases that claim to be the North American standard, or that supposed locally research construction labor, material, and equipment costs, including fringes, on a local basis.

  1. Select a cost database and supporting software that is TRULY researched locally for labor, material, and equipment!    Cost factors or “localization factors” are NOT used.
  2. Select a cost database developed by professionals with decades of experience in line item cost estimating, construction, and job order contracting
  3. Select a construction repair cost estimator that reflect the needs of YOUR organization and isn’t forced upon you.Construction Repair Cost Estimator

4BT Construction Repair Cost Estimator

  • Locally research line item construction costs
  • Descriptions in plain English
  • Full material, equipment, and labor details
  • Prevailing, current, accurate, and localized Davis-Bacon wage rates
  • Independent, objective, and best value data source
  • Guaranteed year-to-year licensing fees – NO SURPRISE PRICE INCREASES

Introduction

The 4BT Construction Repair Cost Estimator and 4BT Unit Price Cost Books are specifically researched and published for each uniquely defined geographic area/market.  A unit price book may include incorporate Regional, State, County, or City levels per client/contract requirement.

The 4BT JOC UPB Cost Data has been developed to enable users to create reasonable construction cost estimates for a wide variety of renovation, repair, and maintenance construction tasks commonly performed on buildings and other physical infrastructure.

While cost data from The R.S. Means Compay, LLC has been used for a large number of JOC Programs; lower cost, high value alternatives are now available as demonstrated by the 4BT Unit Price Book.

4BT JOC Unit Price Books are individually created to account for at least ninety percent (90%) of the renovation, repair, maintenance, and/or construction costs associated with Job Order Contracting. While some unit price books contain hundreds of thousands of line items,  the most commonly associated with facilities and infrastructure, involve far fewer line items in actual practice.   Excessive numbers of line items can create confusion and inefficiencies.

A 4BT Job Order Contract UPB  can vary in size, however, generally does not exceed approximately 60,000-unit price line  items/construction tasks.   Material, equipment, and labor details are provided for commonly encountered renovation, repair, maintenance, and construction tasks.

History – The pedigree of the 4BT Unit Price Book dates back, in part, to  some of the first early Army/DOD  Job Order Contracts deployed in the United States and subsequently have been refined by decades of research and field application.  Over one hundred (100) variations of custom unit price books have also been developed.

Update Frequency – The cost data is continuous, maintained and regularly updated by experienced cost engineers/researchers dedicated exclusively to cost research and cost engineering.  In addition to being the most cost-effective and most accurate representation of labor costs, it likely represents the only true industry alternative to solutions provided by The RSMeans Company, LLC (acquired by The Gordian Group)  and/or The Gordian Group.  It is recommend that UPB’s be updated annually when used in association with Job Order Contracts.

 

Data Architecture – The use of standardized data formats and descriptions, which can easily be understood by all Job Order Contract participants, is central to any successful JOC program.  CSI Masterformat (registered trademark of The Construction Specifications Institute) is the North American standard data format for organizing line item construction cost data and the  format provided within the 4BT JOC UPB Cost Data.  4BT is a licensed partner of CSI, The Construction Specifications Institute.

 

Detailed Task Descriptions – The 4BT JOC UPB provides consistent, clear, and detailed descriptions for each line item in common terms, using “plain English”.  All users can easily understand tasks as abbreviations and non-standard terms are avoided whenever possible.  When used, abbreviations consistently follow established conventions.

 

Material, Equipment, and Labor Detail – Each line item task, in addition to a Description, includes labor,  material, equipment information, and costs as appropriate.

 

4BT JOC UPB & Task Orders – A “detailed estimate of construction cost” for a JOC task or “task order” is a forecast of the predicted cost based upon unit prices with associated breakdowns/descriptions materials, labor, and equipment.  Thus a detailed line item estimate created with an appropriate UPB should better reflect costs than a conceptual, or square-foot level estimate.  The 4BT JOC UPB is designed to provide reasonably current and “accurate” costs of materials, and equipment.  (Note:  In many cases multiple “estimates” are totaled to create a sum for a task order or project, in order to better define work by type (i.e. electrical, mechanical, architectural, etc.).  This level of organization can easily be created in the Job Order Contract System.

While contractors may know what it costs and how long it takes for them or their subs to complete a given task, representing this information in a way for Owners, Subs, AE’s, and Oversight Groups is critical to assure a common understanding of the Owner’s required scope of work and full financial transparency.

A well prepared UPB minimizes estimating efforts and lowers the costs associated with building, updating/maintaining, and associated training costs.  Similarly, the use of standardized construction specifications and/or those specifications currently in use by the Owner also are preferable to custom “JOC” specifications for similar reasons.

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
March 8, 2017Lean Construction Common Data Environment

Lean Construction Common Data Environment

Lean Construction Common Data Environment

A Lean Construction Common Data Environment is important to improving collaboration, quality, delivery times, and overall project satisfaction.

Job Order Contracting, JOC, and Integrated Project Delivery, IPD, the two most common LEAN construction delivery methods, both require a common data environment (CDE).  A unit price book is an example of a common environment for JOC.

Here are a few considerations with respect to designing, using, and maintaining a CDE…

  • Program/project information management roles and responsibilities.
  • Overall information requirements – cost, technical specifications, maintenance requirements, granularity,
  • Information delivery milestones and timelines – version control, update frequency
  • Data architecture standard(s) / classification system (CSI Uniformat/Masterformat)
  • Information production formats and standards – digital, PDF, print
  • Procedures for adding new content
  • Ownership/licensing issues

 

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
March 7, 2017March 7, 2017Define Construction Procurement

Define Construction Procurement

Define Construction ProcurementDefine Construction Procurement

 

Define Construction Procurement… It’s easy to define construction procurement right?   Perhaps not.   Improper construction procurement methods and a relative lack of competency on the part of procurement staff have greatly contributed to poor construction outcomes.

The appropriate procurement and management of construction services resulting in timely, cost effective, and quality outcomes has remained problematic for many/most public organizations.

 

While Federal, State, County, and Local Governments as well as other public entities may have volumes of regulations regarding construction procurement practices, in many cases they are outdated and do not include current LEAN construction procurement/delivery best management practices.

Define Construction ProcurementDefine Construction Procurement

–  A process whereby contractual agreements are designed, bid, and executed between real property owners and construction contractors for renovation, repair, or new construction services for buildings or any form of physical infrastructure.

Services and/or work may include… 

architectural or engineering/design, the construction, alteration, repair, refurbishment or fitting out of buildings and other structures; 

the installation, alteration or repair of plant and equipment designed to be used in, or in relation to, the provision of services for buildings and other structures;

the undertaking, construction, alteration or repair of landscaping and earthworks (whether or not in relation to buildings and other structures);

the demolition, destruction, dismantling or removal of:  buildings and other structures; plant and equipment, earthworks, the clearing of land and the development of land for use as urban land or otherwise; and any other matter declared by the regulations/statutes to be a work.

Valuation of Construction Services

The estimated value and type of a construction services required (including any options such as contract extensions) should  determines the appropriate procurement and construction delivery method.   In order to achieve optimal outcomes both the construction services valuation method and the construction delivery method should be well defined and mandatory.

  • When estimating the value of a construction services procurement in order to determine if it is a covered procurement, the procurement must not be divided into separate parts for the purpose of avoiding a procurement threshold.
  • While an initial procurement of construction services may include a contractual provision for maintenance services for a period after completion of a project, the procurement of maintenance services after that period should subject established regulations.
  • A locally researched, independent, and objective detailed unit price book, UPB, should be used to create internal government budgetary and project estimates, as well as be the foundation of associated methods of construction services procurement.  Using bids from local construction contractors should NOT be used, except to supplement the UPB as required and allowed by  regulations.  The UPB should provide a detailed description of line item construction tasks with appropriate detail for associated labor, material, and equipment.  Common, industry standard terms and data architectures (CSI MasterFormat) should be used.

Regardless of the Construction Procurement and Delivery Methods selected, minimum and maximum dollars values should be established….and, of course, Define Construction Procurement.

 

Define Construction Procurement – Related White Papers and Resources

ASSET LIFE-CYCLE MODEL – Total Cost of Ownership Management – A framework for facilities life-cycle  management.

BIM, LEAN Construction, and a Common Data Environment (CDE) – A  strategic tool for sharing information and managing a team within a BIM / LEAN Construction Delivery environment.

BIM, PROJECT DELIVERY METHODS, WASTE, & LACK OF LEADERSHIP – Traditional design-bid- build (DBB) contracting techniques, and even more recent attempts to improve DBB such as design-build (DB), CM@R, etc. should not be considered LEAN efficient construction delivery methods.

How to Select a JOC Unit Price Book – White Paper – Download – Select a JOC UPB – A JOC  Unit Price Book, UPB is very important to the  quality, integrity, productivity,  and transparency of any Job Order  Contract.

JOB ORDER CONTRACTING – Overview & Best Management Practices – Job Order Contracting White Paper 2016801 – Job Order Contracting (JOC) is a competitively bid, firm-fixed price, Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) LEAN construction delivery method.

COLLABORATION IN CONSTRUCTION – IPD, JOC – Collaboration In Construction-White Paper – Owners determine the  approach  for funding, using, sustaining and disposing of buildings and infrastructure. They also select the construction delivery method.

INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY – for Public and Private Owners – Integrated_Project_Delivery_for_Owners_ – A Joint Effort of the National Association of State Facilities Administrators (NASFA);Construction Owners Association of America (COAA);APPA: The Association of Higher Education Facilities Officers;Associated General Contractors of America (AGC); and American Institute of Architects (AIA)

THE HISTORY OF JOB ORDER CONTRACTING – The LEAN Construction Delivery Method – The United States Department of the Army is attributedwith initially developing and deploying Job Order Contracting during the early 1980s.

Job Order Contracting – A Procurement Success Story, 1998 – Moore, W., Stout, C.

LEAN Construction Detailed Overview – LEAN Construction Institute, LCI – An overview of LEAN Construction

Unit Price Books for Job Order Contracting – A quick tutorial about Unit Price Books, UPB (s), for Job Order Contracting, and what you need to know.

Why BIM Will Not Succeed – Higher Level of Owner Competency Required – BIM requires a higher  level of  interdependence and information sharing in order to fully understand needs, requirements, limitations, desired outcomes, and overall best value.

The What, Why and How of Job Order Contracting (JOC) – CEFPI Educational Brief – JOC a unique cost competitive delivery process for minor construction, renovations, repairs, and alterations that is faster and better than the traditional “design-bid-build” method.

2015-IDIQ-Contract-White-Paper-National-Academy-of-Sciences – Systematic, well-designed research provides the most effective approach to the solution of many problems facing highway  administrators and engineers.

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
March 2, 2017March 2, 2017what is joc

What is JOC

What is JOC

What is JOC might be answered differently by a real property owner, facilities management professional, or construction contractor.

what is joc

The History of What is JOC Today

The United States Department of the Army is attributed with initially developing and deploying Job Order Contracting during the early 1980s.  It did so in response to a growing need for increasing and unsupportable demands for construction throughout Europe.

Traditional design-bid-build (DBB) construction delivery was too inefficient for the large numbers of renovation, repair, and sustainment/maintenance projects. Associated delays were negatively impacting the Army’s mission.
An initial process framework was put in place that would later be improved to become what we now know as Job Order Contracting, JOC. The new method was designed to shorten procurement and overall project delivery times while also maintaining quality.
Since the initial European implementations, JOC was further developed and validated by the U.S. Department of Defense: West Point Academy in 1985, and multiple United States Air Force bases in 1986. The United States Air Force (USAF) has since gone on to become one of the largest, and perhaps most refined, user of Job Order Contracting to this day. Job Order Contracting goes under the name of SABER at USAF bases throughout the world.

Retired USAF and other DOD personnel who now work in other public sectors brought their knowledge with them.

JOC use significantly expanded during the 1990’s, and companies like 4Clicks Solutions, LLC filled the need for dedicated JOC software solutions and JOC training programs to support lower cost and more consistent deployment of Job Order Contracts.  Cost data from the RSMeans Company, LLC was used primarily in support of Federal Government JOC / SABER programs.

Now JOC programs can be supported by multiple suppliers of unit prices books, software types, and associated services.  State, County, and Local Governments, Transportation, Education, and Healthcare entities have begun to use establish Job Order Contracts.  While these entities are relatively new to JOC and are learning to improve their implementations and deployments of this LEAN construction delivery method, the demand for greater efficiency is driving their capabilities forward.

That said, Owners must provide leadership and be competent in supporting JOC without the excessive reliance upon JOC consultants.  Multiple independent and internal JOC program audits have demonstrated that excessive reliance upon JOC consultants and/or lack of sufficient owner training can result in conflicts of interest and/or poor JOC program performance.

JOC must not be used as a method to approve construction project that otherwise would not pass conventional procurement standard.  JOC also should not be used to simply speed procurement.   JOC should be used to improve collaboration, efficiency, quality, and to provide additional benefits for all participants and stakeholders.

What is JOC – A Definition

Job Order Contracting (JOC), a competitively bid, firm-fixed price, Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) delivery system, is a LEAN construction method and a form of Integrated Project Delivery (IPD).

A real property owner (building or other forms of physical infrastructure) establishes a contractor to multi-year contract and relationship with a contractor partnership. (Note: In recent history JOC has also been provided as a service by a third party administrator. In this relationship, the service party should NOT be involved in approving JOC construction projects if they are receiving a fee based upon total JOC construction volume. This practice has been viewed as a conflict of interest and one which can lead to fraud.)
The specific Job Order Contract determines a unit price book (UPB) that has a number of unit price line items complete with descriptions and labor, material and equipment costs. The number of unit price line item varies, however, generally includes approximately 40,000 line items. Most JOCs actually use significantly fewer line items in actual practice. The important factor is that the UPB contain at least 90% of the items common used for the associated JOC.
The cost of a JOC project, also referred to as a Job Order (JO) or Task Order (TO) be determined by creating a detailed line item unit price estimate for the associated Statement of Work (SOW) provided by the Owner. The total of the estimate is then multiplied by a coefficient. The coefficient is a factor that generally ranges from 0.80 to 1.20 is intended to include contractor overhead, profit and any items that reflect the contractor and/or site and/or requirements.

A unit price book, UPB, is typically updated annually/

Cloud-based software is best used for JOC programs as it supports real-time collaboration using current, actionable information.
An example of a work flow involved in a Job Order or Task Order is shown below.

And don’t forget continuous improvement and training!

What is JOC

Learn more…

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
March 1, 2017March 1, 2017JOB ORDER CONTRACTING Cooperatives

JOB ORDER CONTRACTING Cooperatives

JOB ORDER CONTRACTING Cooperatives play an important role for real property owners, facilities manager, and contractors.   As is the case for any business endeavor, it’s a benefit for all parties to do their homework.

Here are some tips for contractors considering working with JOB ORDER CONTRACTING Cooperatives or considering changes in within specific programs.

This particular document was circulated by the National Cooperative Purchasing Alliance, NCPA.

As a construction contractor considering a Job Order Contract (JOC), it is critical to be aware that all JOCs are not the same.

job order contracting cooperatives JOB ORDER CONTRACTING-NCPA

 

Job order contracting cooperatives – Contractor Info

Carefully review all of the Job Order Contract and all associated documents.  Make certain that the roles, responsibilities, tools, requirements and liabilities associated with the JOC are specified.

Determine the answers to the following questions BEFORE you price or accept a Job Order Contract:

  1. Will you be able to perform?
  2. Will you work directly with the real property owner or a consultant?
  3. Will you be able to develop a positive, long term relationship with the owner?
  4. Will you earn a reasonable profit?

The following is a listing of Job Order Contract Do’s and Don’ts. This format is used to review the primary elements of a Job Order Contract from a “best practice” perspective with a focus upon the construction contractor.   It is important to review all Job Order Contract provisions to assure avoidance of any unnecessary financial risk or potential legal issues.[1]

Job Order Contracting (JOC) is a competitively bid, firm-fixed price, Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) LEAN construction delivery method.  It is also implemented by the United States Air Force under the term SABER.  Although some basic attributes of a JOC were originally developed in the early 1980’s in Europe, JOC was greatly refined in the United States by the U.S. Army and U.S. Air Force in the late 1980’s and continues to be improved and expanded.

JOC FUNDAMENTALS and Job Order Contract Cooperatives – Job order contracting, like any LEAN best management process, has basic requirements that focus upon collaboration, transparency, quality, and continuous improvement.

  • Early and ongoing involvement of ALL participants.
  • Value and qualification based selection and procurement.
  • Cost and accounting transparency via standardized cost data architectures, terms, and definitions.
  • Shared risk/reward.
  • Appropriate use of supporting technology.
  • Centralized reporting and oversight with local empowerment, application, management – monitoring, metrics, and continuous improvement.
  • Mutual respect.

IMPORTANT:  If the Job Order Contract you are considering is not in alignment with these core best practices, it is recommended that you discuss the document in more detail with appropriate parties, including, but not limited to, the real property owner / facilities manager, an experience JOC consultant or peer organization, and legal resources familiar with Job Order Contracts.

[1] This document is not providing, nor attempts to provide any form of legal advice. Please seek appropriate legal counsel.

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
February 28, 2017Sample Job Order Contract

Sample Job Order Contract

If your interested in a sample job order contract, just send us your government sector/industry and we will be happy to assist you.

Sample Job Order Contract
Job Order Contract Best Management Practices Matter

A JOC Operations Manual or JOC Execution Guide should always be a component of your job order contract.  We can help you there also.

Example of a tables of contents …

FOREWARD.. 5

INTRODUCTION.. 6

Purpose. 6

History of Job Order Contracting (JOC) 7

Benefits of Job Order Contacting. 9

JOC Organization, Responsibilities, and Authorities. 11

JOC Implementation Considerations. 13

Strategic Evaluation of Objectives, Goals, and Appropriateness. 14

JOB ORDER CONTRACT ACQUISITION/PROCUREMENT STRATEGY. 15

Facility Management/Engineering Planning. 18

The JOC Unit Price Book. 18

Technical Specifications. 20

Statement of Work for the Job Order Contract 20

Economic Price Adjustments. 20

Environmental Coordination. 21

Technical / Document Library. 21

Source Selection Team.. 21

Selection Evaluation Plan. 22

Pre-award Activities. 22

Contractor Phase-In Plan. 23

Contractor Phase-Out Plan. 23

Pre-RFP Review.. 24

Contract Funding. 24

Preproposal Conference. 24

Proposal Evaluation. 25

Competitive Range. 25

Preaward Survey. 25

Evaluation of Contractor Performance. 25

Negotiations and Source Selection. 26

Debriefing Unsuccessful Offerors. 26

Staffing. 26

Facilities. 27

Preaward Activities. 27

Sample JOB ORDER CONTRACT SOP – Standard Operating Procedure – Operations Manual – Execution Manual 27

Sample  – Job Order Contracting Internal Control Checklist 30

JOC Procurement/Award Process. 31

Identification of Participants. 31

Limitations. 32

WORK EXECUTION AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION.. 33

Contract Clauses. 34

Subcontracting Plan Regarding Small, Small Disadvantaged and Women-Owned Small Business  34

Job Order Execution. 34

Initiating and Reviewing Job Orders. 34

In-House or Contract Performance. 35

Methods of Contracting. 35

Job Order Contracting. 35

Job Order / Task Order Routing. 36

Assignment of a Project Manager. 36

Scope Validation Meeting. 37

Request for Contractor’s Proposal 38

Proposal Preparation. 39

Independent Owner Estimate Preparation. 39

Protection of Owner Estimate. 40

Evaluate Contractor’s Proposal 40

Negotiation of Job Order / Task Order. 41

Job Order / Task Order Award Package Preparation. 42

Placing the Order. 42

Preconstruction Meeting. 43

Administrative Responsibilities. 43

Non-Prepriced Items. 44

Contractor Performance. 44

Significant Events. 45

Task Order Close Out 45

Payroll Review.. 46

Timely Accomplishment of Requirements. 46

Contract Status Report 46

Bonding. 47

Payments. 47

Small Business Utilization Reporting. 47

Quality Assurance/Quality Control 48

Task Order Modifications. 48

Changes to T.O. Requirements. 49

FISCAL YEAR-END PLANNING.. 50

Execution of Task Orders Against the Guaranteed Minimum.. 50

Execution of Task Orders Issued After Guaranteed Minimum.. 50

ADDTIONAL ENGINEERING/TECHNICAL/DPW RESPONSIBILITIES. 51

Citation of Funds. 51

Task Order Status Report 52

Exercising Options. 52

FOLLOW-ON CONTRACTING FOR A NEW CONTRACT. 52

APPENDIX. 53

UNDERSTANDING THE CONTRACTOR’S COEFFICIENT. 54

ROLE OF JOC ADMINSTRATOR. 55

INTERNAL CONTROL AND REVIEW PLAN. 55

Job Order Contracting Internal Control Checklist 56

SAMPLE SCOPE OF WORK. 58

SAMPLE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. 60

SAMPLE CONTRACTOR’S PROPOSAL. 61

SAMPLE INDEPENDENT OWNER/GOVERNMENT ESTIMATE. 67

TAKE OFF NOTES: 67

COST ESTIMATE. 68

TASK ORDER FILE CHECKLIST. 71

QUALITY CONTROL PLAN REQUIREMENTS. 73

JOB ORDER CONTRACTING TRAINING. 75

ADDING NON-PREPRICED ITEMS TO YOUR JOC CONTRACTS. 77

ABBREVIATIONS. 79

DEFINITIONS. 82

References / White Papers. 83

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Posts pagination

< 1 … 10 11 12 >
  • Granular local market cost data
  • Project cost estimation levels – Construction
  • Preconstruction Process Improvement
  • Capital Project Management Solution – Built Environment
  • Origins of Percent Plan Complete in Construction

Sustainable FM

RSS feed

RSS feed

© {2024} FOUR BT, LLC
Four BT, LLC
Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Sydney.
%d